Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:39:27.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subsonic aerofoil design 2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

D. M. Somers
D. M. Somers*
Affiliation:
Airfoils Inc, Pennsylvania, USA
*
dan@airfoils.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The state of the art as practiced by a handful of aerofoil designers is discussed. The methods used, both theoretical and experimental, are described. Aerofoil/application design integration and expansion of the design envelope to lower and higher Reynolds numbers are illustrated by examples, including the slotted, natural-laminar-flow aerofoil.

Type
Survey Paper
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 115 , Issue 1165 , March 2011 , pp. 137 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pankhurst, R.C. and Holder, D.W. Wind-Tunnel Technique, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, London, UK, 1965.Google Scholar
2. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. First Annual Report of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1915.Google Scholar
3. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Aerodynamic characteristics of aerofoils, NACA Rep 93, 1920.Google Scholar
4. Hansen, J.R. Engineer in charge, NASA SP-4305, 1987.Google Scholar
5. Munk, M.M. and Miller, E.W. Model tests with a systematic series of 27 wing sections at full Reynolds number, NACA Rep 221, 1925.Google Scholar
6. Jacobs, E.N., Ward, K.E. and Pinkerton, R.M. The characteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from tests in the variable-density wind tunnel, NACA Rep 460, 1933.Google Scholar
7. Jacobs, E.N., Pinkerton, R.M. and Greenberg, H. Tests of related airfoils having the maximum camber unusually far forward, NACA Rep 537, 1935.Google Scholar
8. Jacobs, E.N., Pinkerton, R.M. and Greenberg, H. Tests of related forward-camber airfoils in the variable-density wind tunnel, NACA Rep 610, 1937.Google Scholar
9. Theodorsen, T. Theory of wing sections of arbitrary shape, NACA Rep 411, 1932.Google Scholar
10. Jacobs, E.N. Preliminary report on laminar-flow airfoils and new methods adopted for airfoil and boundary-layer investigations, NACA WR L-345, 1939 (formerly, NACA ACR).Google Scholar
11. Abbott, I.H., Von Doenhoff, A.E. and Stivers, L.S. Jr, Summary of Airfoil Data, NACA Rep 824, 1945. (Supersedes NACA WR L-560.)Google Scholar
12. Abbott, I.H. and Von Doenhoff, A.E. Theory of Wing Sections, Dover Publications, New York, USA, 1959.Google Scholar
13. Truckenbrodt, E. Die Berechnung der Profilform bei vorgegebener Geschwindigkeitsverteilung (The Calculation of the Profile Shape from Specified Velocity Distribution), Ingenieur-Archiv, 1951, 19, (6), pp 365–377.Google Scholar
14. Truckenbrodt, E. A method of quadrature for calculation of the laminar and turbulent boundary layer in case of plane and rotationally symmetrical flow, NACA TM 1379, 1956. (Translated from Ingenieur-Archiv, 1952, 20, (4), pp 211–228.)Google Scholar
15. Wortmann, F.X. Progress in the design of low-drag aerofoils, in: Boundary Layer and Flow Control, 2, Lachmann, G.V. (Ed), Pergamon Press, London, UK, 1961, pp 748–770.Google Scholar
16. Althaus, D. and Wortmann, F.X. Stuttgarter Profilkatalog I (Stuttgart Profile Catalog I), Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, Germany, 1981.Google Scholar
17. Eppler, R. Direct calculation of airfoils from pressure distribution, NASA TT F-15,417, 1974. (Translated from Ingenieur-Archiv, 1957, 25, (1), pp 32–57.)10.1007/BF00536644Google Scholar
18. Eppler, R. Practical calculation of laminar and turbulent bled-off boundary layers, NASA TM-75328, 1978. (Translated from Ingenieur-Archiv, 1963, 32, (4), pp 221–245.)Google Scholar
19. Whitcomb, R.T. and Clark, L.R. An airfoil shape for efficient flight at supercritical Mach numbers, NASA TM X-1109, 1965.Google Scholar
20. Mcghee, R.J., Beasley, W.D. and Whitcomb, R.T. NASA low- and medium-speed airfoil development, NASA TM-78709, 1979.Google Scholar
21. Somers, D.M. Subsonic Natural-Laminar-Flow Airfoils, in: natural laminar flow and laminar flow control, Barnwell, R.W. and Hussaini, M.Y. (Eds), Springer-Verlag New York, USA, 1992, pp 143–176.Google Scholar
22. Naegele, H. and Eppler, R. Plastic sailplane FS-24 Phoenix, Soaring, July-August 1958, 22, (4), pp 2–5. (Translated from Aero Revue, March 1958, 33, pp 140–143.)Google Scholar
23. Eppler, R. Some new airfoils, in: Science and Technology of Low Speed and Motorless Flight, NASA CP-2085, Part I, 1979, pp 131–153.Google Scholar
24. Eppler, R. Airfoil Design and Data, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany, 1990.10.1007/978-3-662-02646-5Google Scholar
25. Maughmer, M.D. and Somers, D.M. Design and experimental results for a high-altitude, long-endurance airfoil, J Aircr, February 1989, 26, (2), pp 148–153.Google Scholar
26. Somers, D.M. The S904 and S905 airfoils, NREL/SR-500-36338, 2005.Google Scholar
27. Horstmann, K.H., Quast, A. and Boermans, L.M.M. Pneumatic turbulators – a device for drag reduction at Reynolds numbers below 5 * 106, AGARD-CP-365, 1984, pp 20-1–20-19.Google Scholar
28. Boermans, L.M.M. and Van GARREL, A. Design and windtunnel test results of a flapped laminar flow airfoil for high-performance sailplane applications, ICAS-94-5.4.3, Anaheim, USA, September 1994.Google Scholar
29. Tangler, J.L. and Somers, D.M. NREL airfoil families for HAWTs, NREL/TP-442-7109, 1995.Google Scholar
30. Timmer, W.A. and Van Rooij, R.P.J.O.M. Summary of the Delft University wind turbine dedicated airfoils, AIAA Paper 2003-0352, January 2003.Google Scholar
31. Somers, D.M. Some new airfoils for rotorcraft, US Army RDECOM TR 10-D-71, 2010. (Available from DTIC.)Google Scholar
32. Selig, M.S., Maughmer, M.D. and Somers, D.M. Natural-laminar-flow airfoil for general-aviation applications, J Aircr, July-August 1995, 32, (4), pp 710–715.Google Scholar
33. Fujino, M., Yoshizaki, Y. and Kawamura, Y. Natural-laminar-flow airfoil development for a lightweight business jet, J Aircr, July-August 2003, 40, (4), pp 609–615.Google Scholar
34. Somers, D.M. and Horstmann, K.-H. Design of a medium-speed, natural-laminar-flow airfoil for commuter aircraft application, DFVLR IB 129-85/26, 1985.Google Scholar
35. Körner, H., Horstmann, K.H., Köster, H., Quast, A. and Redeker, G. Laminarization of transport aircraft wings – a German view, AIAA Paper 87-005, January 1987.Google Scholar
36. Eppler, R. Airfoil Program System ‘PROFIL07’ User’s Guide, Richard Eppler, Stuttgart, Germany, 2007.Google Scholar
37. Drela, M. XFOIL: An analysis and design system for low Reynolds number airfoils, in: Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, Mueller, T.J. (Ed), Lecture Notes in Engineering, 54, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1989, pp 1–12.Google Scholar
38. Drela, M. Design and optimization method for multi-element airfoils, AIAA Paper 93-0969, February 1993.Google Scholar
39. Van Ingen, J.L. A suggested semi-empirical method for the calculation of the boundary-layer transition region, Rep VTH-74, Dep. Aeronaut. Eng, Technol. Univ. Delft, Netherlands, 1956.Google Scholar
40. Smith, A.M.O. and Gamberoni, N. Transition, Pressure Gradient and Stability Theory, Rep. No. ES 26388, Douglas Aircraft Co, 1956.Google Scholar
41. Van Ingen, J.L., Boermans, L.M.M. and Blom, J.J.H. Low-speed airfoil section research at Delft University of Technology, ICAS-80-10.1, Munich, Germany, October 1980.Google Scholar
42. Brophy, C.M. Turbulence Management and Flow Qualification of The Pennsylvania State University Low Turbulence, Low Speed, Closed Circuit Wind Tunnel, MS Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA, 1993.Google Scholar
43. Von Doenhoff, A.E. and Abbott, F.T. Jr The Langley two-dimensional low-turbulence pressure tunnel, NACA TN 1283, 1947.Google Scholar
44. Mcghee, R.J., Beasley, W.D. and Foster, J.M. Recent modifications and calibration of the Langley Low-Turbulence Pressure Tunnel, NASA TP-2328, 1984.Google Scholar
45. Thies, W. Eppler-Profile (Eppler Airfoils), Tenth ed., Modell-TechnikBerater 1/2, Verlag für Technik u. Handwerk, GmbH, Baden-Baden, Germany, 1986.Google Scholar
46. Somers, D.M. and Maughmer, M.D. Experimental results for the E 387 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers in The Pennsylvania State University Low-Speed, Low-Turbulence Wind Tunnel, US Army RDECOM TR 07-D-32, 2007. (Available from DTIC.)Google Scholar
47. Mcghee, R.J., Walker, B.S. and Millard, B.F. Experimental results for the Eppler 387 airfoil at low Reynolds numbers in the Langley Low-Turbulence Pressure Tunnel, NASA TM-4062, 1988.Google Scholar
48. Somers, D.M. Design and experimental results for the S805 airfoil, NREL/SR-440-6917, January 1997.Google Scholar
49. Medina, R. Validation of The Pennsylvania State University Low-Speed, Low-Turbulence Wind Tunnel Using Measurements of the S805 Airfoil, MS Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
50. Somers, D.M. Design and experimental results for the S809 airfoil, NREL/SR-440-6918, January 1997.Google Scholar
51. Somers, D.M. Design and experimental results for the S825 airfoil, NREL/SR-500-36346, January 2005.Google Scholar
52. Wortmann, F.X. Experimental investigations on new laminar profiles for gliders and helicopters, TIL/T.4906, British Ministry Aviation, March 1960. (Translated from Z Flugwissenschaften, August 1957, 5, (8), pp 228–243.)Google Scholar
53. Eppler, R. and Somers, D.M. Airfoil design for Reynolds numbers between 50,000 and 500,000, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Aerodynamics, UNDAS-CP-77B123, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA, June 1985, pp 1–14.Google Scholar
54. Hama, F.R. An efficient tripping device, J Aeronaut Sci, March 1957, 24, (3), pp 236–237.Google Scholar
55. Van Ingen, J.L. and Boermans, L.M.M. Research on laminar separation bubbles at Delft University of Technology in relation to low Reynolds number airfoil aerodynamics, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Low Reynolds Number Airfoil Aerodynamics, UNDASCP-77B123, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA, June 1985, pp 89–124.Google Scholar
56. Eppler, R. Laminar airfoils for Reynolds numbers greater than 4 × 106 , B-819-35, April 1969. (Available from NTIS as N69-28178; translated from Ingenieur-Archiv, 1969, 38, (4/5), pp 232–240).Google Scholar
57. Somers, D.M. Effects of airfoil thickness and maximum lift coefficient on roughness sensitivity, NREL/SR-500-36336, January 2005.Google Scholar
58. Maughmer, M.D. and Somers, D.M. Figures of merit for airfoil/aircraft design integration, AIAA Paper 88-4416, September 1988.Google Scholar
59. Smith, A.M.O. High-lift aerodynamics, AIAA Paper 74-939, August 1974.Google Scholar
60. Pfenninger, W. Investigations on reductions of friction on wings, in particular by means of boundary layer suction, NACA TM 1181, 1947. (Translated from Mitteilungen aus dem Institut für Aerodynamik an der Eidgenössischen Technischen Hochschule Zürich, Nr. 13, 1946.)Google Scholar
61. Somers, D.M. Laminar-flow airfoil, US Patent 6,905,092 B2, June 2005.Google Scholar
62. Somers, D.M. and Maughmer, M.D. Design and experimental results for the S414 airfoil, U.S. Army RDECOM TR 10-D-112, 2010. (Available from DTIC.)Google Scholar
63. Görtler, H. On the three-dimensional instability of laminar boundary layers on concave walls, NACA TM 1375, 1954.Google Scholar
64. Maughmer, M.D. and Coder, J.G. Comparisons of theoretical methods for predicting airfoil aerodynamic characteristics, US Army RDECOM TR 10-D-106, 2010. (Available from DTIC.)Google Scholar