Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T14:08:57.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A view of the future—constraints and opportunities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Gerald G. Kayten*
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Extract

The primary effects of aviation on society are cited fairly regularly by both the aviation community and its critics. Papers already presented at this conference and others have reviewed the direct benefits to commerce, economic development, and world trade, and the unfavourable aspects of energy usage and environmental disruption.

There are also some secondary effects which in the long term may prove even more significant. The characteristic influences of improved transportation systems in general are magnified in the case of air transportation because of its greater scope and pace. The growth of a major transportation system eventually transforms almost every facet of society—the distribution of population within and among countries, the evolution of cities, the development of remote areas, the birth of new industries, the advent of multi-national corporations, the location and structure of governments, the interchange of social philosophies, and even the spread of disease. Increased mobility has accelerated the civil rights movements and the pressures for independence throughout the world. The full schedules of sporting events made possible by air transportation create an outlet for national rivalries on a relatively peaceful basis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1977 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ogburn, W. F. The Social Effects of Aviation. Houghton Mifflin Company, Cambridge, 1946.Google Scholar
2. Report of President's Aircraft Board (Morrow, Dwight W., Chairman, ). Government Printing Office, Washington, 30th November 1925.Google Scholar
3. Proceedings of the workshop: Air transportation demand and systems analysis. MIT Report FTL R-75-8. Cam bridge, September 1975.Google Scholar
4. Domestic and world trends affecting the future of aviation (1980-2000). NASA outlook for aeronautics, Appendix C, prepared by Hudson Institute. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, March 1976.Google Scholar
5. Technology assessment of future intercity passenger transportation systems. Prepared by Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co, University of California, Stanford University, Gellman Research Associates, Inc, and Science Applications, Inc for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the US Department of Transportation. March 1976.Google Scholar
6. Aviation futures to the year 2000. Prepared by The Futures Group for the US Department of Transportation, FAA, Washington, DC. July 1976.Google Scholar
7. Transportation alternatives for the United States in the next fifty years. Prepared by Stanford Research Institute for the US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. March 1977.Google Scholar
8. Toward 2000: Opportunities in transportation evolution. US Department of Transportation Report No DOT-TST- 77-19. Washington, DC. March 1977.Google Scholar
9. Klineberg, J. M. Technology for aircraft energy efficiency. American Society of Civil Engineers, International Air Transportation Conference, Washington, DC. 5th April 1977.Google Scholar
10. Whitehead, A. H. Jr., The promise of air cargo—system aspects and vehicle design. NASA Langley Research Center, NASA TM X-71981. July 1976.Google Scholar
11. Jackson, R. M. Important aspects of international air cargo. Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol 13, No 4, p 50, April 1975.Google Scholar
12. Waters, M. H. and Williams, L. J. Advanced subsonic aircraft concepts for passenger transportation. AIAA Paper No 75-960, 14th Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference, Los Angeles. August 1975.Google Scholar