Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-01T08:02:19.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collective Memory and Selective Amnesia in a Transmutational Paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

Peyi Soyinka-Airewele
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Akin to myth, only tangentially related to the empirical truth, collective memory plays a key role in the symbolic discourse of politics, in the legitimation of political structures and action and in the justification of collective behavior.

This article is a tentative incursion into the making and workings of collective memory in the recent Nigerian elections. The crisis of memory—construction, distortion, exploitation, and suppression—is evident in the Nigerian “transmutation” process—the perpetuation in power, through civilianization, of a military regime. The term “transmutation” is used here to convey the sense of a political mutation, a process of uncertain nature or progeny, certainly a transition, but one emanating from an unlikely parentage, a brutal and militarized past.

Type
Part 1
Information
African Issues , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 44 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Markovits, Andrei S. and Reich, Simon, The German Predicament: Memory & Power in the New Europe (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997), 14–15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Durotoye, Yomi and Griffiths, Robert J., “Civilianizing Military Rule: Conditions and Processes of Political Transmutation in Ghana and Nigeria,” African Studies Review 40 (December 1997): 133–160 Google Scholar

3. O’Donnell, Guillermo and Schmitter, Philippe C., Transitions From Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986), 31–32 Google Scholar.

4. Makin Soyinka (MEFA), “Nigerian Democracy in the Making” (1999).

5. Tsedu, Mathatha, “Nigerian Grouping of Ethnic Enclaves,” Vanguard (Lagos), March 1999 Google Scholar.

6. Quoted in Hovinnisian, Richard G., “Introduction: History, Politics, Ethics,” in The Armenian Genocide, ed., Hovinnisian, Richard G. (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992), xxi CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. “We Were All Framed: Interview With Alhaji Mato,” The News, 11, no. 24 (December 28, 1998): 34–35 Google Scholar.

8. Ibid., 35.

9. The Source 4, no. 12 (December 21, 1998): 21-24 (emphasis mine).

10. Adam, Herbert and Moodley, Kogela, “The Purchased Revolution in South Africa: Lessons for Democratic Transformation,” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 3, no. 4 (winter 1997): 113–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Tell, no. 51 (December 21, 1998).

12. The Source 4, no. 10, December 14, 1998.

13. Smith, Kathleen E., Remembering Stalin’s Victims: Popular Memory and the End of the USSR (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996), 6 Google Scholar.

14. “Why I Must Challenge Polls Result, by Falae,” Vanguard (Lagos), March 10, 1999 Google Scholar.

15. Werbner, Richard, “Beyond Oblivion: Confronting Memory Crisis,” in Memory and the Postcolony, ed., Werbner, Richard (London: Zed Books, 1998), 13 Google Scholar.

16. Benita Parry, 1995, p. 9.