Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:54:39.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Crisis in Area Programs: A Time for Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Donald Wilhelm
Donald Wilhelm*
Affiliation:
Center for International and Comparative Programs, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper had its genesis in the soul-searching of the now-famous Montreal ASA annual meeting of 1969 and in constructive discussions at the Boston annual meeting of 1970. At the latter meeting, I chaired a panel discussion (under the rubric of “New Directions in Area Programs”) in which a troublesome topic was ably probed by Olu Fadahunsi of Nigeria, John Povey, and Rodger Yeager. Their insights, together with those of others, are here brought to bear on the very real crisis which confronts so-called area studies programs in general and so-called African studies programs in particular.

As Gray Cowan (1970, pp. 346-347) has noted, “We are entering upon a decade, or perhaps longer, in which it has become clear that the resources and opportunities for area study in the United States will be undergoing substantial reduction from those of the previous decade.” He joins others in warning that both the Federal government and the foundations are curtailing their support levels and that other impediments are rising including the growing reluctance of African host governments to allow freewheeling research by expatriates. Far from being unsubstantiated cries of alarm, such warnings are prompted by trends which are all too real. Moreover, the trends may best be regarded as symptomatic of a much deeper crisis--a crisis of concepts much more than merely of such limitations as funding or access to the field.

Type
Research Article
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , September 1971 , pp. 171 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Commission on International Development (Pearson Commission). Partners in Development. New York: Praeger, 1969.Google Scholar
Cowan, L. Gray. “President's Report.” African Studies Review, Vol. XIII, No. 3 (December, 1970).Google Scholar
Easton, David. “The New Revolution in Political Science.” American Political Science Review, Vol. LXIII, No. 4 (December, 1969).Google Scholar
Fadahunsi, Olu. “Area Programs and National Advancement.” Paper prepared for presentation at the thirteenth annual meeting of the African Studies Association, Boston, October 1970.Google Scholar
Fagan, Brian M. Review of Carter, Gwendolen M. and Paden, Ann, eds., Expanding Horizons in African Studies (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1969), in Africa Report, Vol. 15, No. 5 (May, 1970).Google Scholar
Gowon, Yakabu. Address on occasion of the twenty-first anniversary of the University of Tbadan, Nigeria, November 17, 1969.Google Scholar
Povey, John. “The Development of African Studies Programs.” Paper prepared for presentation at the thirteenth annual meeting of the African Studies Association, Boston, October 1970.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Donald Jr., “Political Science, the Othes Sciences, and Relevance.” Paper prepared for presentation at the sixty-sixth annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, September 1970.Google Scholar
Yeager, Rodger. “The Legitimacy of Area Studies.” Paper prepared for presentation at the thirteenth annual meeting of the African Studies Association, Boston, October 1970.Google Scholar