Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:55:57.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Materiality and Social Agency of the Malaḥfa (Mauritanian Veil)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2019

Abstract:

This article examines the malaḥfa, a veil that has long been popular in Mauritania, using the scholarship of materiality to analyze how it and the wearer co-constitute each other. This approach demonstrates how the malaḥfa’s particular form and fabric provide women with certain constraints and possibilities; women activate these qualities to exercise agency, be it in redefining their positions in the social hierarchy, exercising control in their relationships, or asserting authority over others. Focusing on the malaḥfa’s materiality illustrates how such garments can be central to women’s agency and power, and demonstrates how women shape the broader social hierarchy.

Résumé:

Cet article examine le malaḥfa, un voile longtemps populaire en Mauritanie. À l’aide de la recherche sur la matérialité, j’analyse comment le voile et son porteur se façonnent l’un à l’autre. Cette approche montre comment la fabrique et la forme particulière du malaḥfa donne aux femmes contraintes et possibilités ; les femmes utilisent ces qualités pour exercer leur liberté d’action, que ce soit en redéfinissant leurs positions dans la hiérarchie sociale, exercer contrôle dans leurs relations, ou affirmer leurs autorités sur les autres. Mettant l’accent sur l’importance que le malaḥfa représente en tant qu’objet, cette analyse illustre comment ce vêtement peut être centrale à servir à l’action et le pouvoir des femmes et montre de ce fait comment les femmes peuvent façonner la hiérarchie sociale.

Resumo:

Este artigo analisa o malaḥfa, um véu que há muito se tornou popular na Mauritânia; recorrendo ao conceito académico de materialidade, procura-se compreender de que modo o véu e a sua portadora se constituem um ao outro. Este estudo demonstra que o formato e o tecido específicos do malaḥfa subordinam as mulheres a determinados constrangimentos, ao mesmo tempo que lhes abrem determinadas possibilidades; as mulheres ativam estes atributos para exercerem a sua agencialidade, seja redefinindo o seu posicionamento na hierarquia social, seja exercendo controlo sobre os seus relacionamentos ou impondo autoridade sobre os outros. Ao centrar-se sobre a materialidade do malaḥfa, a autora revela que este tipo de indumentária pode desempenhar um papel central para a agencialidade e o poder das mulheres e explica o modo como estas determinam a hierarquia social em geral.

Type
Forum: Bodily Practices and Aesthetic Rituals in Twentieth- and Twenty-First-Century Africa
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others.” American Anthropologist 104 (3): 783–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aïdara, Cheikh. 2013. “Célibat des femmes: Le probable titre d’une prochaine révolution en Mauritanie.” L’Authentique, July 7, 2013. http://cridem.org.Google Scholar
Ali, Kecia. 2010. Marriage and Slavery in Early Islam. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Amato, Sarah. 2011. “Fit to a T: Spray-On Clothing, Craft, Commodity Fetishism, and the Agency of Objects.” Utopian Studies 22 (2): 285302.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Mukulika, and Miller, Daniel. 2003. The Sari. New Delhi: Roli Books in arrangement with Roli & Jansen BV.Google Scholar
Bastian, Misty L. 2013. “Dressing for Success: The Politically Performative Quality of an Igbo Woman’s Attire.” In African Dress: Fashion, Agency, Performance, edited by Hansen, Karen Tranberg and Soyini Madison, D., 1529. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bernal, Victoria. 1994. “Gender, Culture, and Capitalism: Women and the Remaking of Islamic ‘Tradition’ in a Sudanese Village.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 36 (1): 3667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonte, Pierre. 1990. “L’‘ordre’ de la tradition. Evolution des hiérarchies statutaires dans la société maure contemporaine.” In Mauritanie: entre arabité et africanité, edited by Robert Baduel, Pierre, 118–29. Aix-en Provence: Éditions ÉDISUD.Google Scholar
Brhane, Meskerem. 1997. Narratives of the Past, Politics of the Present: Identity, Subordination and the Haratines of Mauritania. Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Buggenhagen, Beth Anne. 2012. Muslim Families in Global Senegal: Money Takes Care of Shame. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Cleaveland, Timothy. 2000. “Reproducing Culture and Society: Women and the Politics of Gender, Age, and Social Rank in Walāta.” Canadian Journal of African Studies 34 (2): 189217.Google Scholar
Cleaveland, Timothy. 2002. Becoming Walāta: A History of Saharan Social Formation and Transformation. Portsmouth, NH.: Heinemann.Google Scholar
El Guindi, Fadwa. 1999. Veil: Modesty, Privacy, and Resistance. New York: Berg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, Laura. 2001. Pastimes & Politics: Culture, Community, and Identity in Post-Abolition Urban Zanzibar, 1890–1945. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Fall, Mohamed Chouaib. 2008. “Rapport: Etude de base pour l’ADP de Kankossa.” World Vision Mauritanie ADP Kankossa.Google Scholar
Fortier, Corinne. 1998. “Le corps comme mémoire: du giron maternel à la férule du maître coranique.” Journal des africanistes 68 (1–2): 197224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortier, Corinne. 2011. “Women and Men Put Islamic Law to Their Own Use: Monogamy versus Secret Marriage in Mauritania.” In Gender and Islam in Africa: Rights, Sexuality, and Law, edited by Badran, Margot, 213–31. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: an Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Karen Tranberg. 2000. Salaula: The World of Secondhand Clothing and Zambia. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, Deniz. 1988. “Bargaining with Patriarchy.” Gender and Society 2 (3): 274–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2005a. “The Hazards of New Clothes: What Signs Make Possible.” In The Art of Clothing: A Pacific Experience, edited by Kūchler, Susanne and Were, Graeme, 116. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2005b. “Signs Are Not the Garb of Meaning: On the Social Analysis of Material Things.” In Materiality, edited by Miller, Daniel, 182205. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesourd, Céline. 2007. “‘Capital beauté.’ De quelques riches femmes maures.” Politique Africaine 107 (3): 6280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesourd, Céline. 2010. Mille et un litres de thé: Enquête auprès des businesswomen de Mauritanie. Paris: Ginko éditeur.Google Scholar
Lydon, Ghislaine. 2009. On Trans-Saharan Trails: Islamic Law, Trade Networks, and Cross-Cultural Exchange in Western Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: the Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Masquelier, Adeline. 2009. Women and Islamic Revival in a West African Town. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
McDougall, E. Ann. 1988. “A Topsy-Turvy World: Slaves and Freed Slaves in the Mauritanian Adrar, 1910–1950.” In The End of Slavery in Africa, edited by Miers, Suzanne and Roberts, Richard L., 362–90. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
McDougall, E. Ann. 2005. “Living the Legacy of Slavery: Between Discourse and Reality.” Cahiers d’études africaines 45 (179/180): 957–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, E. Ann. 2010. “The Politics of Slavery in Mauritania: Rhetoric, Reality and Democratic Discourse.” The Maghreb Review 35 (3): 260–86. Meneley, Anne. 2007. “Fashions and Fundamentalisms in Fin-de-siècle Yemen: Chador Barbie and Islamic Socks.” Cultural Anthropology 22 (2): 214–43.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 2005a. “Introduction” In Clothing as Material Culture, edited by Küchler, Susanne and Miller, Daniel, 119. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 2005b. “Materiality: An Introduction.” In Materiality, edited by Miller, Daniel, 150. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mir, Shabana. 2014. Muslim American Women on Campus: Undergraduate Social Life and Identity. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moors, Annelies. 2012. “Popularizing Islam: Muslims and Materiality—Introduction.” Material Religion 8 (3): 272–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moors, Annelies, and Tarlo, Emma. 2007. “Introduction.” Fashion Theory 11 (2–3): 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morphy, Howard. 2009. “Art as a Mode of Action: Some Problems with Gell’s Art and Agency.” Journal of Material Culture 14 (1): 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office National de la Statistique (ONS). 2011. “Annuaire statistique 2010.” Nouakchott: ONS.Google Scholar
Office National de la Statistique (ONS). 2008. “Assaba en chiffres, 1995–2007.” ONS.Google Scholar
Ould Jiddou, Baba. 2004. “La communauté haratine.” L’ouest Saharien 4: 159–82.Google Scholar
Ould-Mey, Mohameden. 1996. Global Restructuring and Peripheral States: The Carrot and the Stick in Mauritania. Lanham, Maryland: Littlefield Adams Books.Google Scholar
Rabine, Leslie W. 2013. “Religious Modesty, Fashionable Glamour, and Cultural Text: Veiling in Senegal.”In Veiling in Africa, edited by Renne, Elisha P., 112. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Susan J. 2009. “Critically Re-Thinking ‘Islamic Dress’.” The American Journal of Semiotics 25 (1/2): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Susan J. 2013. “Re-casting the Veil: Situated Meanings of Covering.” Culture & Psychology 19 (2): 237–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renne, Elisha P. 2013. “Introduction: Veiling/Counter-Veiling in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Veiling in Africa, edited by Renne, Elisha P., 112. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ruf, Urs Peter. 1999. Ending Slavery. Hierarchy, Dependency and Gender. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandikci, Özlem, and Ger, Güliz. 2005. “Aesthetics, Ethics and Politics of the Turkish Headscarf.” In Clothing as Material Culture, edited by Küchler, Susanne and Miller, Daniel, 6182. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Simard, Gisèle. 1996. Petites commerçantes de Mauritanie: Voiles, perles et henné. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Sylvanus, Nina. 2016. Patterns in Circulation: Cloth, Gender, and Materiality in West Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tarlo, Emma. 2010. Visibly Muslim: Fashion, Politics, Faith. New York: Berg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauzin, Aline. 2001. Figures du féminin dans la société maure (Mauritanie). Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Tauzin, Aline. 2007. “Women of Mauritania: Cathodic Images and Presentation of the Self.” Visual Anthropology 20 (1): 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ünal, R. Arzu, and Moors, Annelies. 2012. “Formats, Fabrics, and Fashions: Muslim Headscarves Revisited.” Material Religion 8 (3): 308–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villasante-de Beauvais, Mariella. 2000. “La Question des hiérarchies sociales et des groupes serviles chez les bidân de mauritanie.” In Groupes serviles au Sahara: Approche comparative à partir du cas des arabophones de Mauritanie, edited by Villasante-de Beauvais, Mariella, 277322. Paris: Éditions CNRS.Google Scholar
Wehr, Hans. 1994. A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic. 4th ed. Urbana, Ill.: Spoken Language Services, Inc.Google Scholar
Wiley, Katherine Ann. 2013. “Fashioning People, Crafting Networks: Multiple Meanings in the Mauritanian Veil (Malaḥfa).” In Dress, Performance, and Social Action in Africa, edited by Tranberg Hansen, Karen and Soyini Madison, D., 7791. New York: Blooomsbury.Google Scholar
Wiley, Katherine Ann. 2014. “Joking Market Women: Critiquing and Negotiating Gender and Social Hierarchy in Kankossa, Mauritania.” Africa 84 (1): 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, Katherine Ann. 2016. “Making People Bigger: Wedding Exchange and the Creation of Social Value in Rural Mauritania.” Africa Today 62 (3): 4970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, Katherine Ann. 2018. Work, Social Status, and Gender in Post-slavery Mauritania. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar