Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:36:22.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Characteristics of Colonialism and Its Product, African Nationalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Marion Mushkat*
Affiliation:
International Law and International Relations, University of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel

Extract

No doubt, social problems cannot be fully understood by a mere comparison between any present situation and that prevailing in the past, say even sixty or seventy years ago. Nevertheless, there seems to be no little justification for the tendency, frequently seen in important research works on Africa, to make a parallel between the status and fight of the working classes in Europe at the end of the last century and those of the emancipating nations in general and in the African continent in particular.

It is pointed out in these works that in both cases the revendicatiohs made by the working classes in the first instance, and by whole nations in the second, were prompted by the desire for a fuller democratization of the society, an amelioration of their economic situation and legal status. Such changes were and are being achieved, amongst others, by the abolition or through reform of discriminatory legal, political, and socioeconomic systems which had previously been imposed by privileged ruling classes to the detriment of the other classes, on a national scale, where poor classes of the population were concerned in countries that now rank among the most developed ones, and on an international scale, where it is a question of peoples who have only recently passed from a state of slavehood to national independence.

Thanks to a political and social legislation containing elements of social compromise, most Western countries have become modern, democratic, affluent welfare states, with at least a minimum of social justice and no expropriation of the means of production. But in those countries where the ruling classes were uncompromising, refused to make concessions, and caused revolutions, they were completely chased from the political scene, as was the case in Eastern Europe, which gave birth to an altogether new regime (Roling 1960, p. 56).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Akzin, B. State and Nation. London, 1964.Google Scholar
Al Hamishmar. June 10, 1966.Google Scholar
Arora, R. S.The Sino Indian Conflict: A Study of Diplomatic Maneuvers.” International Spectator, Vol. XX (1965).Google Scholar
Avineri, S. K. Marx on Colonialism and Modernization. London, 1968.Google Scholar
Avineri, S.Marx and Modernization.” Review of Politics, Vol. XXXI, No. 2 (1969).Google Scholar
Awolowo, Obafemi. The Autobiography. Cambridge, 1960.Google Scholar
Balandier, G. Sociologie actuelle de 'Afrique Noire. 2nd ed. Paris, 1963.Google Scholar
Blagojevic, B.Law and Modernization in New States.” Review of International Affairs, No. 398 (1966a).Google Scholar
Blagojevic, B.The Rule of State in the Economic Development of Africa.” Review of International Affairs, No. 387 (May 30, 1966).Google Scholar
Blyden, W. E.The Negro in Ancient History.” In The People of Africa. New York, 1871.Google Scholar
Cesaire, A. Discourse sur le colonialism. 3rd ed. Paris, 1958.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. Nigeria: Background to Nationalism. Berkley: University of California Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corzien, B.The Struggle for the Third World.” International Affairs (July 1964).Google Scholar
Cross, W. McGregor. Kenya from Within: A Short Political History. London, 1927.Google Scholar
Curtin, H. D.Nationalism in Africa, 1945, 1965.” Review of Politics, Vol. XXVIII, No. 2 (1966).Google Scholar
Decraene, Ph. Le panafricanisme. Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. Fran Empire to Nation: The Rise of Self-Assertion of Asian and African Peoples. Cambridge, Mass., 1959.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. Political Unification. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. Les damńes de la terre. Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. and Pritehard, E. Evans. African Political Systems. London, 1940.Google Scholar
Grohs, G. Stuten Afrikanischer Emanzipation. Stuttgart, 1967.Google Scholar
Grundy, K. W.African Explanations of Underdevelopment: The Theoretical Basis for Political Action.” Review of Politics, Vol. XXVIII (1966).Google Scholar
Houphouet-Boigny, F.Black Africa and the French Union.” Foreign Affairs, No. 598 (July 1957).Google Scholar
Irele, A.Negritude or Black Cultural Nationalism.” Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. III, No. 31.Google Scholar
Jaly, R. W. In The Journal of African History, VII, 1 (1964), 74.Google Scholar
Kimble, D. A Political History of Ghana: The Rise of Gold Coast Nationalism, 1850-1920. Oxford, 1963.Google Scholar
Kohn, H. In Strausz-Hupe, R. and Hazard, H. W., eds. The Idea of Colonialism. London, 1958. Pp. 216 Google Scholar
Lanternai, V. The Religions of the Oppressed. London, 1963.Google Scholar
Legum, C. Pan Africanism. New York, 1965.Google Scholar
Lenin, N. Works. Vol. XXII. Polish, ed. n.d.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. The Dynamics of Change. New Haven, 1961.Google Scholar
Memmi, A. La liberation du Juif. Paris, 1966.Google Scholar
Mosely, Ph. E.Communist Policy and the Third World.” Review of Politics, Vol. XXVIII (1966).Google Scholar
Mushkat, M. Theory and Practices in International Relations. Hebrew, ed. Tel Aviv, 1959.Google Scholar
Mushkat, M. International Cooperation. Hebrew, ed. Tel Aviv, 1961.Google Scholar
Nasser, A. The Philosophy of a Revolution. Cairo, 1954.Google Scholar
Nkrumah, K. Conscientism: Philosophy and Ideology for Decolonization and Development with Particular Reference to the African Revolution. 2nd ed. London, 1964.Google Scholar
Owolovo, Obafemi. Forward to a New Nigeria. London, 1957.Google Scholar
Perham, M. The Colonial Reckoning. London, 1963.Google Scholar
Perham, U.A Restatement of Indirect Rule.” Africa (July 1934).Google Scholar
Planze, O.Nationalism in Europe, 1848-1870.” Review of Politics, Vol. XXVIII, No. 2 (1966).Google Scholar
Pye, L. W. and Verba, S., eds. Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roling, B. V. O. International Law in an Expanded World. Amsterdam, 1960.Google Scholar
Rotberg, R. I. The Rise of Nationalism in Central Africa: The Making of Malawi and Zambia, 1873-1964. Cambridge, Mass., 1965.Google Scholar
Rotberg, R. I.African Nationalism: Concept or Confusion?Journal of Modern African Studies, No. 1 (1966).Google Scholar
Schaffer, B. R.The Concept of Preparation.” World Politics, Vol. XVIII, No. 1 (1960).Google Scholar
Senghor, L. Sedar. “A Community of Free and Equal Peoples with the Mother Country.” Western World, No. 18 (October 1958).Google Scholar
Senghor, L. Sedar. Nation et voie africaine du socialisme. Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
Senghor, L. Sedar. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin et la politique africaine. Dakar, 1962a.Google Scholar
Senghor, L. SedarSome Thoughts on Africa, a Continent in Development.” International Affairs, Vol. XXXVIII (April 1962b).Google Scholar
Senghor, L. Sedar. Theorie et practique du socialisme senegalais. Dakar, 1964.Google Scholar
Siegmund, P. E. The Ideologies of Developing Countries. New York, 1963.Google Scholar
Touré, Sekou. L'Experience quinénne et 1'unité africaine. Paris, 1959.Google Scholar
Touval, S.The Organization of African Unity and African Borders.” International Organization, Vol. XXI, No. 1 (1967).Google Scholar
Twitchett, K. Colonialism: An Attempt at Understanding Imperial, Colonial, and Neo-Colonial Relationships.” Political Studies, Vol. XIII (1965).Google Scholar
United Nations. Survey of Asia and the Far East (1964). Bangkok: U.N., 1965a.Google Scholar
United Nations. World Economic Survey. New York: U.N., 1965b.Google Scholar
Wildenmann, R. and Parkalla, H.. Nationalismus in Entwickengopolitik. Berlin-Mainz: Handbuck and Lexicon, 1966.Google Scholar
Wright, Q. The Study of International Relations. New York, 1955.Google Scholar