Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:21:58.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Change and stability in loneliness and friendship after an intervention for older women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2016

CAMILLE M. S. MARTINA ,
NAN L. STEVENS  and
GERBEN J. WESTERHOF
CAMILLE M. S. MARTINA*
Affiliation:
Department of Developmental Psychology & Psychogerontology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
NAN L. STEVENS
Affiliation:
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
GERBEN J. WESTERHOF
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
*
Address for correspondence: Camille Martina, Department of Developmental Psychology & Psychogerontology, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail: c.martina@psych.ru.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study we examine patterns of change and stability in loneliness among 108 women who had participated in a friendship enrichment programme during the year after the programme. We distinguished seven groups of participants in which different levels of loneliness significantly declined, remained stable or increased. These were reduced to the following groups: those recovered, significantly improved and not improved. We then examined whether resources such as age, education, partner status, health, initially available friendships and developments in friendships were related to these loneliness patterns. The data were collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews, a loneliness scale and the personal convoy model. The results indicate that none of the demographic characteristics, nor health, were associated with the patterns of loneliness. Friendship availability and development did differ among the groups. Recovery from loneliness after a year was associated with the presence of a friend in the outer circle of the convoy and having more variation in one's friendships initially and one year later. It was also associated with the presence of a friend in the inner circle and reporting improvement in friendship later. The absence of these qualities initially or subsequently was more characteristic of those whose loneliness was stable or increased. Thus, the maintenance of companionate friendship and the development of intimacy in one's friendships seem advantageous for recovery from loneliness. While this study illustrates that recovery from, and significant reduction of loneliness are possible, we are not yet able to predict who will benefit and who will not benefit from a friendship enrichment programme.

Keywords

lonelinessfriendshipinterventionolder women
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , March 2018 , pp. 435 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumeister, R. F. and Leary, M. R. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 3, 497–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bode, C., De Ridder, D. T. D., Kuijer, R. G. and Bensing, J. M. 2007. Effects of an intervention promoting proactive coping consequences in middle and later life. The Gerontologist, 47, 1, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T. and Patrick, W. 2008. Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M. and Charles, S. T. 1999. Taking time seriously: theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 3, 165–81.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. and Feeley, T. H. 2014. Social support, social strain, loneliness and well-being among older adults: an analysis of the Health and Retirement Study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 2, 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Manfield, J. and Parpura-Gill, A. 2007. Loneliness in older persons: a theoretical model and empirical findings. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 2, 279–94.Google Scholar
De Jong Gierveld, J. 1998. A review of loneliness: concept and definitions, determinants and consequences. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 8, 1, 73–80.Google Scholar
De Jong Gierveld, J. and Kamphuis, F. 1985. The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 3, 289–99.Google Scholar
De Jong Gierveld, J. and Van Tilburg, T. 1999. Manual of the Loneliness Scale. Department of Social Research Methodology, Free University, Amsterdam. Available online at http://home.fsw.vu.nl/tg.van.tilburg/manual_loneliness_scale_1999.html [Accessed 21 November 2014].Google Scholar
De Jong Gierveld, J., Van Tilburg, T. and Dykstra, P. A. 2006. Loneliness and social isolation. In Perlman, D. and Vangelistis, A. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 485–500.Google Scholar
Ferraro, K. F. and Farmer, M. M. 1995. Social compensation in adulthood and later life. In Dixon, R. A. and Backman, L. (eds), Compensating for Psychological Deficits and Declines: Managing Losses and Promoting Gain. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 127–45.Google Scholar
Fiori, K. L., Antonucci, T. C. and Cortina, K. S. 2006. Social network typologies and mental health among older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61B, 1, 25–32.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. J and Katz, J. E. 2000. Social desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 2, 105–20.Google Scholar
Hansson, R. O., Daleiden, E. L. and Haylisp, B. 2004. Relational competence across the life span. In Lang, F. R. and Fingerman, K. L. (eds), Growing Together: Personal Relationships Across the Life Span. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 317–40.Google Scholar
Hartup, W. W. and Stevens, N. 1997. Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3, 355–70.Google Scholar
Hawkley, L. C. and Cacioppo, J. T. 2007. Aging and loneliness: downhill quickly? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 4, 187–91.Google Scholar
Hawkley, L. C. and Cacioppo, J. T. 2010. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 2, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxhold, O., Miche, M. and Schüz, B. 2013. Benefits of having friends in older ages: differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69B, 3, S366–75.Google Scholar
Kahn, R. L. and Antonucci, T. C. 1980. Convoys over the life course: attachment roles and social support. In Baltes, P. B. and Brim, O. (eds), Life Span Development and Behaviour. Volume 3, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 253–86.Google Scholar
Kremers, I. P., Steverink, N., Albersnagel, F. A. and Slaets, J. P. J. 2006. Improved self-management ability and well-being in older women after a short group intervention. Aging & Mental Health, 10, 5, 476–84.Google Scholar
Laursen, B. and Hoff, E. 2006. Person-centerd and variable-centered approaches to longitudinal data. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 52, 3, 377–89.Google Scholar
Litwin, H. and Shiovitz-Ezra, S. 2010. Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. The Gerontologist, 51, 3, 379–88.Google Scholar
Luo, Y., Hawkley, L. C., Waite, L. J. and Cacioppo, J. T. 2012. Loneliness, health, and mortality in old age: a national longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 6, 907–14.Google Scholar
Martina, C. M. S. and Stevens, N. L. 2006. Breaking the cycle of loneliness? Psychological effects of a friendship enrichment program for older women. Aging & Mental Health, 10, 5, 467–75.Google Scholar
Martina, C. M. S., Stevens, N. L. and Westerhof, G. J. 2012. Promotion of self-management in friendship. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 2, 245–53.Google Scholar
Oshri, A., Tubman, G., Wagner, E. F., Leon-Morris, S. and Snyders, J. 2008. Psychiatric symptom patterns, proximal risk factors, and sexual risk behaviours among youth in outpatient substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78, 4, 430–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouwehand, C. 2005. Proactive coping and successful aging. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Peplau, L. A. and Perlman, D. 1982. Perspectives on loneliness. In Peplau, L. A. and Perlman, D. (eds), Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy. Wiley, New York, 1–18.Google Scholar
Pinquart, M. and Sörensen, S. 2001 a. Gender differences in selfconcept and psychological well-being in old age: a meta-analysis. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56B, 4, P195–213.Google Scholar
Pinquart, M. and Sörensen, S. 2001 b. Influences on loneliness in older adults: a meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 4, 245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, B. A., Krause, N., Liang, J. and Bennett, J. 2007. Tracking changes in social relations throughout late life. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62B, 2, S90–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenberg, C. M., Beekman, A. T. F., Deeg, D. J. H. and Van Tilburg, W. 2000. Sex differences in late-life depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101, 4, 286–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Stevens, N. 2001. Combating loneliness: a friendship enrichment programme for older women. Ageing & Society, 21, 2, 183–202.Google Scholar
Stevens, N. L., Martina, C. M. S. and Westerhof, G. J. 2006. Meeting the need to belong: predicting effects of a friendship enrichment program for older women. The Gerontologist, 46, 4, 495–502.Google Scholar
Stevens, N. L. and Van Tilburg, T. G. 2011. Cohort differences in having and in retaining friends personal networks in later life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 1, 24–43.Google Scholar
Stevens, N. L. and Westerhof, G. J. 2006. Partners and others: social provisions and loneliness among married Dutch men and women in the second half of life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 6, 921–41.Google Scholar
Steverink, N., Lindenberg, S. and Slaets, J. P. J. 2005. How to understand and improve older people's self management of wellbeing. European Journal of Aging, 2, 4, 235–44.Google Scholar
Suanet, B., Van Tilburg, T. G. and Broese van Groenou, M. I. 2013. Nonkin in older adults’ personal networks: more important among later cohorts? Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68B, 4, 633–43.Google Scholar
Van Tilburg, T. G. 1998. Losing and gaining in old age: changes in personal network size and social support in a four-year longitudinal study. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 53B, 6, S313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wruz, C., Hänel, M., Wagner, J. and Neyer, F. J. 2013. Social network changes and life events across the life span: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1, 53–80.Google Scholar