Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:47:24.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, capital endowment and digital exclusion of older people in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2020

Juhua Yang Open the ORCID record for Juhua Yang [Opens in a new window]  and
Peng Du
Juhua Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China
Peng Du
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: Juhua_Yang@ruc.edu.cn, Juhua.Yang00@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Amid rapid population ageing and the high-speed progress of information and communications technology, use of smart electronics can improve older people's quality of life by helping them to stay connected, active and independent, which may, in turn, increase their overall happiness and sense of social belonging. Taking a gender perspective, this paper aims to understand variations in digital exclusion among older people. Using data from the 2016 China Longitudinal Ageing Social Survey, it finds that digital exclusion seems to vary by gender, with rural female older people being most excluded, possibly because they have the lowest capital endowment. The gender difference in the digital divide is even more salient with all other things being equal. Digital exclusion in the information era may further exacerbate gender inequality, particularly for those who are already most vulnerable. Since digital inclusion is somewhat inherent in the concept of intelligent old-age support, it should be considered an urgent necessity to help older people, especially rural women, become familiar with smart electronic products.

Keywords

gender gapcapital endowmentdigital exclusiondigital povertyolder peopleChina
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 41 , Issue 11 , November 2021 , pp. 2502 - 2526
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M and Perrin, A (2017) Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/.Google Scholar
Baker, S, Waycott, J, Pedell, S, Hoang, T and Ozanne, E (2016) Older people and social participation: from touch-screens to virtual realities. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Interactive Technology and Ageing Populations, Association for Computing Machinery, NY, USA, pp. 34–43 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G (2007) Health as human capital: synthesis and extensions. Oxford Economic Papers 3, 379–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boz, H and Karatas, S (2015) A review on internet use and quality of life of the elderly. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 3, 182–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) (2018) China's Internet Users Reach 731 Million Equivalent to Europe's Population. Available at http://www.isc.org.cn/zxzx/gzwm/listinfo-34893.html.Google Scholar
China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) (2019) Statistical Report on the Development of Internet in China. Available at http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019zt/cnnic43/.Google Scholar
Cimpoieru, C (2011) Digital inclusion of the elderly: an ethnographic pilot-research in Romania. In International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications, DICTAP 2011, Dijon, France, pp. 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P and Hargittai, E (2001) From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: studying Internet use as penetration increases. Working Paper 15. Available at https://culturalpolicy.princeton.edu/sites/culturalpolicy/files/wp15_dimaggio_hargittai.pdf.Google Scholar
Fischer, S, Davida, H, Crotty, B, Dierks, M and Safran, C (2014) Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. International Journal of Medical Informatics 83, 624–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golant, M (2017) A theoretical model to explain the smart technology adoption behaviors of elder consumers (Elderadopt). Journal of Ageing Studies 42, 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, A, Zhou, Z, Fang, Y and Leiyu, S (2017) The digital divide and health disparities in China: evidence from a national survey and policy implications. Journal of Medical Internet Research 9, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iancu, I and Iancu, B (2017) Elderly in the digital era. Theoretical perspectives on assistive technologies. Technologies 5, 60–72.Google Scholar
iiMedia Research (2018) Monitoring Report on ‘Internet Addiction’ Hot Spots of Chinese Elderly. Available at http://www.iimedia.cn/62211.html.Google Scholar
Jia, W, Wang, S and Liu, L (2014) Operational challenges and solutions in intelligent elderly support. Information China 11, 56–60.Google Scholar
Kakulla, B (2019) Tech Trends and the 50+. Washington, DC: AARP Research. Available at https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00269.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalaila, R and Vitman-Schorr, A (2018) Internet use, social networks, loneliness, and quality of life among adults aged 50 and older: mediating and moderating effects. Quality of Life Research 2, 479–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelkes, O (2012) Happier and less isolated: internet use in old age. MPRA Paper 42546. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42546.Google Scholar
Pan, S (2010) Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese older adults: from the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 5, 1111–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pénard, T and Mayol, A (2015) Facebook Use and Individual Well-being: Like Me to Make Me Happier! Available at http://crem.univ-rennes1.fr/wp/2015/201506.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
People's Network (2018) A Survey of Internet Access and Risk in the Elderly. Available at http://yuqing.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0629/c405625-30096878.html.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2016) Social Media Update 2016. Available at http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2016/11/10132827/PI_2016.11.11_Social-Media-Update_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
Phillips, JE, Ajrouch, KJ and Hillcoat-Nallétamby, S (2010) Key Concepts in Social Gerontology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Schultz, TW (1961) Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
Shapira, N, Barak, A and Gal, I (2007) Promoting older adults’ well-being through Internet training and use. Ageing and Mental Health 5, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sum, S, Mathews, M, Hughes, I and Campbell, A (2008) Internet use and loneliness in older adults. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 2, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H, McConnell, E, Clipp, E, Branch, LG, Sloane, R, Pieper, C and Box, TL (2002) A randomized controlled trial of the psychosocial impact of providing internet training and access to older adults. Ageing and Mental Health 3, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C, Yeung, D, Ho, H, Tse, K and Lam, C (2014) Chinese older adults’ internet use for health information. Journal of Applied Gerontology 3, 316–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J (2017) Fertility policy and family change in China. Open Times 3, 12–26.Google Scholar
Yang, J (2019) Smart elderly support: concepts, challenges, and policy implications. Social Science Journal 5, 102–111.Google Scholar
Yang, J and He, Z (2014) Continuity or change? A Chinese family in the transitional era. Demographic Research 2, 36–51.Google Scholar
Zuo, M (2014) Contents, patterns, and challenges of intelligent elderly support. China Public Security 10, 48–50.Google Scholar