Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:34:09.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interaction of age and gender in illness narratives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2008

CLIVE SEALE  and
JONATHAN CHARTERIS-BLACK
CLIVE SEALE
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.
JONATHAN CHARTERIS-BLACK
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recognition of the greater capacity of older women to draw on supportive social networks has now supplemented an earlier focus of research into gender and ageing which portrayed older men as a ‘privileged gerontocracy’ because of their greater access to financial resources and spousal care. This study of the experiences of cancer among people of three different age groups conducted a comparative keyword analysis of their narratives to consider the gender differentiation of a third resource: access to medical information and personnel. The analysed narratives were sampled from a large archive of research interviews. It was found that older men with cancer demonstrated a greater involvement with medicine as an expert system than younger men or women or older women. This stemmed from their social confidence when interacting with doctors and their interest in treating their illness as a ‘problem’ to be fixed with medico-scientific solutions. Compared with younger men and women of all ages, older men were less likely to draw on informal social and family networks for support, or to discuss in a direct style the emotional dimension of illness experience. Our findings contrast with other studies that have reported linguistic disadvantage in older people in elderly care settings, which underlines the importance of context for linguistic studies.

Keywords

genderageresourcescancerlinguisticscomparative keyword analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 28 , Issue 7 , October 2008 , pp. 1025 - 1045
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, G. 2005. Family Life. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Applegate, J. S. 1997. Theorizing older men. In Kosberg, J. I. and Kaye, L. W. (eds) Elderly Men: Social Problems and Professional Challenges. Springer Publishing Company, New York, 1–15.Google Scholar
Arber, S. 2004. Gender, marital status and ageing: linking material, health and social resources. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 1, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, S. and Ginn, J. 1991. Gender and Later Life: A Sociological Analysis of Resources and Constraints. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Arber, S. and Ginn, J. 2005. Gender dimensions of the age shift. In Johnson, M. L. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 527–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, S., Andersson, L. and Hoff, A. 2007. Changing approaches to gender and ageing. Current Sociology, 55, 2, 147–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. and Parry, J. 2004. Renegotiating identity and relationships: men and women's adjustments to retirement. Ageing & Society, 24, 2, 213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. 1988. Methodology and scholarship in understanding ideological explanation. In Antaki, C. (ed.) Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Case Book of Methods. London, Sage, 199–215.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. 2003. Gender and language ideologies. In Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds) The Handbook of Language and Gender. Blackwell, Oxford, 447–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cancer, Research 2006. Cancerstats: Incidence UK. Cancer Research UK, London. Available online at info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/incidence/ [Accessed 18 February 2008].Google Scholar
Chappell, N. 1989. Health and helping among the elderly: gender differences. Journal of Aging and Health, 1, 1, 102–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, K. and Seale, C. 2008. Men and the expression of emotion: evidence from illness experience. Gender and Language, 2, 2, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 2002. Men Talk: Stories in the Making of Masculinities. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 2004. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. Pearson Education, London.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. 2005. Masculinities. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. 1991. Preface: sociolinguistic issues in ageing. Ageing & Society, 11, 1, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. 1997. Language, ageing and ageism: a project for applied linguistics? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7, 1, 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. and Coupland, J. 1994. Age-identity and health-identity in geriatric medical discourse. In Lauritzen, S. O. and Sacks, L. (eds) Health Care Encounters and Culture: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Swedish Immigration Institute and Museum, Stockholm, Sweden, 89–128.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. 1997. Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Coulmas, F. (ed.) The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Blackwell, Oxford, 151–67.Google Scholar
Estes, C. 2005. Women, ageing and inequality: a feminist perspective. In Johnson, M. L. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 552–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galasiński, D. 2004. Men and the Language of Emotions. Palgrave, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, R., Fitch, M., Davis, C. and Phillips, C. 1996. Breast cancer and prostate cancer self help groups: reflections on differences. Psycho-oncology, 5, 2, 137–42.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerrome, D. 1993. Intimate relationships. In Bond, J., Coleman, P. and Peace, S. (eds) Ageing in Society: An Introduction to Social Gerontology. London, Sage, 226–54.Google Scholar
Klemm, P., Hurst, M., Dearholt, S. L. and Trone, S. R. 1999. Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. Computers in Nursing, 17, 2, 65–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Kulik, L. and Bareli, H. Z. 1997. Continuity and discontinuity in attitudes toward marital power relations: pre-retired vs retired husbands. Ageing & Society, 17, 5, 571–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner-Rubino, K., Winter, D. G. and Stewart, A. J. 2004. Gender, social class and the subjective experience of ageing: self-perceived personality change from early adulthood to late midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 12, 1599–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perren, K., Arber, S. and Davidson, K. 2003. Men's organisational affiliations in later life: the influence of social class and marital status on informal group membership. Ageing & Society, 23, 1, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P. 2005. Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment. Computing Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire. Available online at http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix// [Accessed 18 February 2008].Google Scholar
Russell, C. 2007. What do older women and men want? Gender differences in the ‘lived experience’ of ageing. Current Sociology, 55, 2, 173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. 2005. Wordsmith Tools 4.0. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Available online at www.lexically.net/wordsmith/version4 [Accessed 18 February 2008].Google Scholar
Seale, C. 2006. Gender accommodation in online cancer support groups. Health, 10, 3, 345–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J. and Ziebland, S. 2006. Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 10, 2577–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seale, C. and Charteris-Black, J. 2008. The interaction of class and gender in illness narratives. Sociology, 42, 3, 455–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speer, S. 2005. Gender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Victor, C., Scambler, S., Shah, S., Cook, D., Harris, T., Rink, E. and de Wilde, S. 2002. Has loneliness amongst older people increased? An investigation into variations between cohorts. Ageing & Society, 22, 5, 585–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, G. C., Davies, R., Shahtahmasebi, S. and Scott, A. 1996. Social isolation and loneliness in old age: review and model refinement. Ageing & Society, 16, 3, 333–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar