Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:38:41.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relying on informal care in the new century? Informal care for elderly people in England to 2031

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2001

LINDA PICKARD
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics.
RAPHAEL WITTENBERG
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics.
ADELINA COMAS-HERRERA
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics.
BLEDDYN DAVIES
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics.
ROBIN DARTON
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent.

Abstract

The research reported here is concerned with the future of informal care over the next thirty years and the effect of changes in informal care on demand for formal services. The research draws on a PSSRU computer simulation model which has produced projections to 2031 for long-term care for England. The latest Government Actuary's Department (GAD) 1996-based marital status projections are used here. These projections yield unexpected results in that they indicate that more elderly people are likely to receive informal care than previously projected. The underlying reason is that the GAD figures project a fall in the number of widows and rise in the number of elderly women with partners. What this implies is that ‘spouse carers’ are likely to become increasingly important. This raises issues about the need for support by carers since spouse carers tend to be themselves elderly and are often in poor health. The article explores a number of ‘scenarios’ around informal care, including scenarios in which the supply of informal care is severely restricted and a scenario in which more support is given to carers by developing ‘carer-blind’ services. This last scenario has had particular relevance for the Royal Commission on Long Term Care.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)