Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:49:45.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can individual budgets have an impact on carers and the caring role?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2012

K. JONES ,
A. NETTEN ,
P. RABIEE ,
C. GLENDINNING ,
H. ARKSEY  and
N. MORAN
K. JONES*
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
A. NETTEN
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
P. RABIEE
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.
C. GLENDINNING
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.
H. ARKSEY
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.
N. MORAN
Affiliation:
Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Karen Jones, Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Cornwallis Building, Canterbury CT2 7NF, UK. E-mail: k.c.jones@kent.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The introduction of cash-for-care schemes such as individual or personal budgets in England has been seen as central to the personalisation agenda for reforming the delivery of adult social care. However, despite there being 5.2 million carers in England and Wales, the initiative concentrates predominantly on the needs of the service user. The implementation of individual budgets (IBs) was piloted within 13 local authorities during 2005–2007 and the Department of Health commissioned an independent evaluation of this pilot (IBSEN). The focus was only on the service user in the evaluation and therefore a separate but linked study was set up to evaluate the impact and outcomes of IBs on carers. Carers of service users who had consented to take part in the main IBSEN study were identified and invited to participate in a follow-up study aimed at exploring how IBs impacted on carers and the caring role. The study found that the receipt of the budget was significantly associated with positive impacts on carers' reported quality of life and, when other factors were taken into account, with social care outcomes. These outcome gains were achieved despite no higher costs being incurred to the public purse, thus suggesting that IBs for service users are cost-effective for carers.

Keywords

individual budgetspersonalisationcarers
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 157 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balducci, C., Mnich, E., McKee, K. J., Lamura, G., Beckmann, A., Krevers, K. J., Wojszel, Z. B., Nolan, M. R., Provskas, C., Bien, B. and Öberg, B. 2008. Negative impact and positive value in caregiving: validation of the COPE index in a six-country sample of carers. The Gerontologist, 48, 3, 276–86.Google Scholar
Bowling, A. 1995. Measuring Disease. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
Bowling, A., Banister, D., Sutton, S., Evans, O. and Windsor, J. 2002. A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age. Ageing and Mental Health, 6, 4, 355–71.Google Scholar
Burge, P., Gallo, F. and Netten, A. 2006. Valuing PSS outputs and quality changes. PSSRU Discussion Paper 2356, Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office 2005. Improving the Life Chances of Disabled People. Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health 2001. Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disabilities for the 21st Century. Department of Health, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health 2006. Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services. Department of Health, London.Google Scholar
Duffy, S. 2005. Individual budgets: transforming the allocation of resources for care. Journal of Integrated Care, 13, 1, 8–16.Google Scholar
Glendinning, C., Arksey, H., Jones, K., Moran, N., Netten, A. and Rabiee, P. 2009. The Individual Budgets Pilot Projects: Impact and Outcomes for Carers. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.Google Scholar
Glendinning, C., Challis, D., Fernandez, J.-L., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Manthorpe, J., Moran, N., Netten, A., Stevens, M. and Wilberforce, M. 2008. Evaluation of the individual budgets pilot programme: final report. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. 1992. General Health Questionnaire. NFER Nelson, Windsor, UK.Google Scholar
HM Government 2008. Carers at the Heart of 21st-century Families and Communities: ‘A Caring System on Your Side. A Life of Your Own’. HM Government, London.Google Scholar
HM Government 2010 a. Building the National Care Services. HM Government, London.Google Scholar
HM Government 2010 b. Recognised, Valued and Supported: Next Steps for the Carers Strategy. HM Government, London.Google Scholar
Leadbetter, C. 2004. Personalisation Through Participation: A New Script for Public Services. Demos, London.Google Scholar
McKee, K., Philp, I., Lamura, G., Prouskas, C., Öberg, B., Krevers, B., Spazzafumo, L., Bień, B., Parker, C., Nolan, M. R. and Szczerbinska, K. 2003. The COPE index – a first stage assessment of negative impact, positive value and quality of support of caregiving in informal carers of older people. Aging and Mental Health, 7, 1, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Needham, C. 2011. Personalising Public Services: Understanding the Personalisation Narrative. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
Needham, C. and Carr, S. 2009. Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. SCIE Research Briefing 31, Social Care Institute for Excellence, London.Google Scholar
Netten, A., Forder, J. and Shapiro, J. 2006. Measuring personal social services outputs for national accounts: services for older people. Discussion Paper 2267/3, Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics 2001. National Statistics: Census 2001. Office for National Statistics, London.Google Scholar
Parasuraman, A., Zeithami, V. and Berry, L. 1985. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 4, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, R., Oakerson, E., Ostrom, V., Ostrom, V., Percey, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P. and Wilson, R. 1981. Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9, 7, 1001–11.Google Scholar