Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T15:00:07.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Canadian power mobility device users' experiences of ageing with mobility impairments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2015

ALEXANDRA KOROTCHENKO  and
LAURA HURD CLARKE
ALEXANDRA KOROTCHENKO*
Affiliation:
School of Kinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
LAURA HURD CLARKE
Affiliation:
School of Kinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
*
Address for correspondence: Alexandra Korotchenko, School of Kinesiology, The University of British Columbia, 156–1924 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z2 E-mail: alex.korotchenko@ubc.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we draw upon interviews with 14 men and 15 women aged 51–92 to examine the embodied experiences of Canadian power mobility device users. In particular, we investigate how individuals ageing with mobility impairments perceived and experienced the practical impacts and symbolic cultural connotations of utilising a power mobility device. Our findings reveal that those participants who had begun to use their power mobility devices later in life were dismayed by and apprehensive about the significance of their diminishing physical abilities in the context of the societal privileging of youthful and able bodies. At the same time, the participants who had used a power mobility device from a young age were fearful of prospective bodily declines, and discussed the significance and consequences of being unable to continue to operate their power mobility devices autonomously in the future. We consider the ways in which the participants attempted to manage, mitigate and reframe their experiences of utilising power mobility devices in discriminatory environments. We discuss our findings in relation to on-going theoretical debates pertaining to the concepts of ‘biographical disruption’ and the third and fourth ages.

Keywords

ageingpower mobilitymobility impairmentmeaning as significancemeaning as consequencethird agefourth age
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , July 2016 , pp. 1238 - 1253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bury, M. 1982. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4, 2, 167–82.Google Scholar
Bury, M. 1988. Meanings at risk: the experience of arthritis. In Anderson, R. and Bury, M. (eds), Living with Chronic Illness: The Experience of Patients and Their Families. Unwin Hyman, London, 89–116.Google Scholar
Campbell, F. A. K. 2001. Inciting legal fictions: disability’s date with ontology and the ableist body of the law. Griffith Law Review, 10, 1, 42–62.Google Scholar
Faircloth, C. A., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., Young, M. E. and Gubrium, J. 2004. Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociology of Health & Illness, 26, 2, 242–61.Google Scholar
Gabel, S. and Peters, S. 2004. Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Disability & Society, 19, 6, 585–600.Google Scholar
Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. 2013. The fourth age and the concept of a ‘social imaginary’: a theoretical excursus. Journal of Aging Studies, 27, 4, 368–76.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. 2002. Disability and the body. In Barnes, C., Oliver, M. and Barton, L. (eds), Disability Studies Today. Polity Press, Cambridge, 59–76.Google Scholar
Hurd Clarke, L. and Bennett, E. 2013. ‘You learn to live with all the things that are wrong with you’: gender and the experience of multiple chronic conditions in later life. Ageing & Society, 33, 2, 342–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korotchenko, A. and Hurd Clarke, L. 2014. Power mobility and the built environment: the experiences of older Canadians. Disability & Society, 29, 3, 431–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loja, E., Costa, E. M., Hughes, B. and Menezes, I. 2013. Disability, embodiment, and ableism: stories of resistance. Disability & Society, 28, 2, 190–203.Google Scholar
Lorenz, R. A. 2009. Indicators of preclinical disability: women's experiences of an aging body. Journal of Women and Aging, 21, 2, 138–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Pound, P., Gompertz, P. and Ebrahim, S. 1998. Illness in the context of old age: the case of stroke. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20, 4, 489–506.Google Scholar
Priestley, M. 2006. Disability and old age: or why it isn't all in the mind. In Goodley, D. and Lawthom, R. (eds), Disability and Psychology: Critical Introductions and Reflections. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 84–93.Google Scholar
Sanders, C., Donovan, J. and Dieppe, P. 2002. The significance and consequences of having painful and disabled joints in older age: co-existing accounts of normal and disrupted biographies. Sociology of Health & Illness, 24, 2, 227–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada 2006. The 2006 Participation and Activity Limitation Survey: Analytical Report. Available online at http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-628-x/2007002/4183079-eng.htm [Accessed 8 September 2010].Google Scholar
Swain, J. and French, S. 2000. Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15, 4, 569–82.Google Scholar
Tagizadeh Larsson, A. and Jeppsson Grassman, E. 2012. Bodily changes among people living with physical impairments and chronic illnesses: biographical disruption or normal illness? Sociology of Health & Illness, 34, 8, 1156–69.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 2002. Disability theory: key ideas, issues, and thinkers. In Barnes, C., Oliver, M. and , Barton , L. (eds), Disability Studies Today. Polity Press, Cambridge, 38–57.Google Scholar
Torres, S. and Hammarstrom, G. 2006. Speaking of ‘limitations’ while trying to disregard them: a qualitative study of how diminished everyday competence and aging can be regarded. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 4, 291–302.Google Scholar
Wilkins, S. 2001. Aging, chronic illness, and self-concept: a study of women with osteoporosis. Journal of Women & Aging, 13, 1, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, S. J. 2000. Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept. Sociology of Health & Illness, 22, 1, 40–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. H. 2001. Theorizing disability. In Albrecht, G. L., Seelman, K. D. and Bury, M. (eds), Handbook of Disability Studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 123–33.Google Scholar