Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:13:00.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Citizenship and structured dependency: the implications of policy design for senior political power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2009

GEMMA M. CARNEY
GEMMA M. CARNEY*
Affiliation:
Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, National University of Ireland Galway, County Galway, Republic of Ireland.
*
Address for correspondence: Gemma Carney, Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, J.E. Cairnes Building, National University of Ireland Galway, County Galway, Republic of Ireland. E-mail: gemma.carney@nuigalway.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that the structured dependency thesis must be extended to incorporate political power. It outlines a political framework of analysis with which to identify who gains and who loses from social policy. I argue that public policy for older people is a product not only of social structures but also of political decision-making. The Schneider and Ingram (1993) ‘target populations’ model is used to investigate how the social construction of groups as dependent equates with lower levels of influence on policy making. In United Kingdom and European research, older people are identified as politically quiescent, but conversely in the United States seniors are viewed as one of the most influential and cohesive interest groups in the political culture. Why are American seniors perceived as politically powerful, while older people in Europe are viewed as dependent and politically weak? This paper applies the ‘target populations’ model to senior policy in the Republic of Ireland to investigate how theoretical work in the United States may be used to identify the significance of senior power in policy development. I conclude that research must recognise the connections between power, politics and social constructions to investigate how state policies can influence the likelihood that seniors will resist structured dependency using political means.

Keywords

political economypolicystructured dependencypolitical powersocial construction
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , February 2010 , pp. 229 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, K. 2003. Neither Boston nor Berlin: class polarisation and neo-liberalism in the Irish Republic. In Coulter, C. and Coleman, S. (eds), The End of History? Critical Reflections on the Celtic Tiger. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, 56–73.Google Scholar
Baars, J., Dannefer, D., Phillipson, C. and Walker, A. 2006. Aging, Globalization and Inequality: The New Critical Gerontology. Baywood, Amityville, New York.Google Scholar
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. 1962. Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56, 4, 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, V. L., Putney, N. and Johnson, M. 2000. The problem of theory in gerontology today. In Johnson, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3–20.Google Scholar
Binstock, R. H. 2000. Older people and voting participation: past and future. The Gerontologist, 40, 1, 18–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Binstock, R. H. 2005. The contemporary politics of old age policies. In Hudson, R. B. (ed.), The New Politics of Old Age Policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 265–93.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. L. 2002. Self-interest, social security, and the distinctive participation patterns of senior citizens. American Political Science Review, 96, 3, 565–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. L. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, G. 2007. Home Care in the Republic of Ireland: A Research Paper. Irish Senior Citizens Parliament, Dublin (November).Google Scholar
Central Statistics, Office 2007. Ageing in Ireland. Central Statistics Office, Dublin. Available online at http://www.cso.ie/releasespublications/documents/other_releases/2007/ageinginireland.pdf [Accessed 18 October 2008].Google Scholar
Coakley, J. 2005 a. The foundations of statehood. In Coakley, J. and Gallagher, M. (eds), Politics in the Republic of Ireland. Fourth edition, Routledge in association with PSAI Press, Abingdon, UK, 3–35.Google Scholar
Coakley, J. 2005 b. Society and political culture. In Coakley, J. and Gallagher, M. (eds), Politics in the Republic of Ireland. Fourth edition, Routledge in association with PSAI Press, Abingdon, UK, 36–71.Google Scholar
Dannefer, D. 2003. Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: cross fertilizing age and social science theory. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, 6, S327–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickason, A. 1977. The feminine as a universal. In Vetterling-Braggin, M., Elliston, F. A. and English, J. (eds), Feminism and Philosophy. Littlefield, Adams and Company, Totowa, New Jersey, 79–100.Google Scholar
Donnellan, E. 2007. Groups urge delay of elderly care scheme. Irish Times, 28 November. Available online at http://www.irishtimes.com [Accessed 23 April 2009].Google Scholar
Duncan, C. 2008. The dangers and limitations of equality agendas as means for tackling old-age prejudice. Ageing & Society, 28, 8, 1133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, C. 1979. The Aging Enterprise: A Critical Examination of Social Policies and Services for the Aged. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Estes, C. 2001. Social Policy and Ageing: A Critical Perspective. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Estes, C., Biggs, S. and Phillipson, C. (eds) 2003. Social Theory, Social Policy and Ageing: A Critical Introduction. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.Google Scholar
Evers, A. and Wolf, J. 1999. Political organization and participation of older people traditions and changes in five European countries. In Walker, A. and Naegele, G. (eds), The Politics of Old Age in Europe. Open University: Buckingham, UK, 42–61.Google Scholar
Ferge, Z. 1997. A central European perspective on the social quality of Europe. In Beck, W., van der Maesen, L. and Walker, A. (eds), The Social Quality of Europe. Kluwer International, The Hague, 165–81.Google Scholar
Galligan, Y. 1998. Women and Politics in Contemporary Ireland: From the Margins to the Mainstream. Pinter, London.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. 1982. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gray, A. 2009. The social capital of older people. Ageing & Society, 29, 1, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herd, P. and Kingson, E. R. 2005. Reframing social security: cures worse than the disease. In Hudson, R. B. (ed.), The New Politics of Old Age Policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 183–203.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. B. (ed.) 2005. The New Politics of Old Age Policy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Ingram, H. and Schneider, A. 1995. Social construction (continued): response. American Political Science Review, 89, 2, 441–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, H. and Schneider, A. 2005. Introduction: public policy and the social construction of deservedness. In Scneider, A. and Ingram, H. (eds), Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy. SUNY Press, Albany, New York, 1–28.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. 1998. Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilisation, Collectivism and Long Waves. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
King, N. and Calasanti, T. 2006. Empowering the old: critical gerontology and anti-aging in a global context. In Baars, J., Dannefer, D., Phillipson, C. and Walker, A. (eds), Aging, Globalization and Inequality: The New Critical Gerontology. Baywood, Amityville, New York, 139–58.Google Scholar
Kirby, P., Gibbons, L. and Cronin, M. (eds)2002. Reinventing Ireland: Culture, Society and the Global Economy. Pluto, London.Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. and Wilton, R. 2003. Disability activism and the politics of scale. Canadian Geographer, 47, 2, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, R. 1995. Social construction (continued). American Political Science Review, 89, 2, 437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangan, I. 2006. Care of Older People. Services Industrial Professional and Technical Union, Dublin. Available online at http://www.siptu.ie/Resources/SIPTUPublications/FileDownload,3992,en.pdf [Accessed 23 April 2009].Google Scholar
McHugh, K. 2003. Three faces of ageism: society, image and place. Ageing & Society, 23, 2, 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Council on Ageing and Older People 2005. An Age-friendly Society: A Position Statement. Report 88, National Council on Ageing and Older People, Dublin. Available online at http://www.ncaop.ie/newsevents/88_AFS_Statement.pdf [Accessed 9 April 2009].Google Scholar
Nursing Homes Ireland 2007. Key Facts. Nursing Homes Ireland, Dublin. Available online at http://www.nhi.ie/iopen24/defaultarticle.php?cArticlePath=3 [Accessed 23 April 2009].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dell, E. (ed.)2006. Older People in Modern Ireland: Essays on Law and Policy. First Law, Dublin.Google Scholar
O'Shea, E. 2006 a. Developing a healthy ageing policy for Ireland: the view from below. Health Policy, 76, 1, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Shea, E. 2006 b. Older and Bolder: Towards a National Strategy for Older People in Ireland. Older and Bolder Campaign, Dublin. Available online at http://www.olderandbolder.ie [Accessed 22 October 2008].Google Scholar
O'Shea, E. 2006 c. Public policy for dependent older people in Ireland: review and reform. In O'Dell, E. (ed.), Older People in Modern Ireland: Essays on Law and Policy. First Law, Dublin, 8–30.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. 1993. When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45, 4, 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, A. 2009. Spatial perspectives on voluntarism in learning disability services in Ireland. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 2, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. 1995. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. 1993. The social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 2, 334–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (eds) 2005. Deserving and Entitled: Social Constructions and Public Policy. SUNY Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. 1989. The welfare state and generation conflict: winners and losers. In Johnson, P., Conrad, C. and Thomson, D. (eds), Workers versus Pensioners: Intergenerational Justice in an Ageing World. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, 33–56.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. 1991. Selfish Generations? The Ageing of the Welfare State. Bridget Williams, Wellington.Google Scholar
Timonen, V., Convery, J. and Cahill, S. 2006. Care revolutions in the making? A comparison of cash-for-care programmes in four European countries. Ageing & Society, 26, 3, 455–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. 1981. The structured dependency of the elderly: a creation of social policy in the twentieth century. Ageing & Society, 1, 1, 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P. 2006. Policies for the aged in the 21st century: more ‘structured dependency’ or the realization of human rights? Ageing & Society, 26, 2, 161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. J., Shields, T. G. and Sharp, D. 2001. Changes and continuities in the determinants of older adults' voter turnout 1952–1996. The Gerontologist, 41, 6, 805–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. and Brady, H. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H. and Nie, N. H. 1993. Who participates? What do they say? American Political Science Review, 87, 2, 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J. A. 1999. Politics, Power and Old Age. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. A., Patterson, G. and Wale, K. 2001. Politics and Old Age: Older Citizens and Political Processes in Britain. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 1981. Towards a political economy of old age. Ageing & Society, 1, 1, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. 1999. Political participation and representation of older people in Europe. In Walker, A. and Naegele, G. (eds), The Politics of Old Age in Europe. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 7–24.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 2005. Towards an international political economy of ageing. Ageing & Society, 25, 6, 815–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. 2006 a. Ageing and politics: an international perspective. In Binstock, R. H. and George, L. L. (eds), Handbook of Ageing and the Social Sciences. Sixth edition, Academic, San Diego, California, 339–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, A. 2006 b. Re-examining the political economy of aging: understanding the structure/agency tension. In Baars, J., Dannefer, D., Phillipson, C. and Walker, A. (eds), Aging, Globalization and Inequality: The New Critical Gerontology. Baywood, Amityville, New York, 59–80.Google Scholar
Walker, A. and Naegele, G. (eds) 1999. The Politics of Old Age in Europe. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.Google Scholar
Walsh, K. and O'Shea, E. 2008. Responding to rural social care needs: older people empowering themselves, others and their community. Health and Place, 14, 4, 795–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, J. and Watts-Roy, D. 2008. Aging boomers, generational equity, and framing the debate over social security. In Hudson, R. (ed.), Boomer Bust: Economic and Political Issues of the Graying Society. Volume 1, Greenwood, Westport, Connecticut. Pre-publication copy available online at http://www2.bc.edu/~jbw/documents/GEJWDW.pdf [Accessed 31 March 2009].Google Scholar
Wilson, G. 2000. Understanding Old Age: Critical and Global Perspectives. Sage, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. 2002. Globalisation and older people: effects of markets and migration. Ageing & Society, 22, 5, 647–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, N. 1991. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women. Morrow, New York.Google Scholar