Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:41:29.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Classical Indian Philosophical Perspective on Ageing and the Meaning of Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad
Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore0511.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Indian thought conceives of life in four normative stages: of student, householder, forest-dweller and renouncer. A metaphysical theory related to the conception of life-stages is that of the ends or purposes of life: appropriate conduct, material well-being, physical satisfaction and liberation. The theory of the ends of life is reconstructed here in the light of contemporary philosophical discussions about the meaning of life. The first three ends are part of a world-oriented attitude; the last end, of world-transcending contemplation. Among age-neutral and age-specific ways of relating life stages and life ends, that of taking old age as the time for the renunciatory stage is important and is examined in the context of the two main theories of meaning: world-oriented and world-transcending. Old age is secondary to earlier stages in a world-oriented theory, more significant in the world-transcendent one. However, both theories, seen independently, are paradoxical. In a synthesis, the world-transcendence of renunciation in old age is paramount in Indian thought, but worldly action is significant because renunciation depends on the richness of the life renounced. This reconstruction of an ancient ideal is offered as a philosophical paradigm for transculturally relevant attitudes to life in old age.

Keywords

Old ageageingIndianlife-stagesmeaning of lifephilosophy
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 1 - 36
Copyright
Copyright Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Āpastambha, . 1906. Dutt, M. N. (ed.) Āpastambha samhitā. H. C. Dass, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Benerji, S. C. 1962. Dharmasutras. Punthi Pustak, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D. 1968. Jaina Ethics. Motilal Benarsidass, Delhi.Google Scholar
Baudhyāyana, . 1882. Buhler, T. (trans.). Baudhyāyana dharmasūtra. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1960. World renunciation in Indian religions. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 4, 33–62.Google Scholar
Dutt, S. 1924. Early Buddhist Monasticism. Trubner and Co., London.Google Scholar
Gautama, . 1906. Dutt, M. N. (ed.). Gautama Samhitā. H. C. Dass, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Gutmann, D. 1977. The cross-cultural perspective: Notes towards a comparative psychology in aging. In Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W. (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Hārita, . 1906. Dutt, M. N. (ed.). Hārita Samhitā. H. C. Dass, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Jacobi, H. 1895. Jaina Sutras. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kane, P. V. 1941. A History of the Dharmaśāstra. Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Poone.Google Scholar
Lingat, R. 1973. The classical law of India. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
McDonnell, A. A. 1913. A History of Sanskrit Literature. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1981. After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Mahābhāratha. n.d. Gita Press, Gorakhpur.Google Scholar
Manu, . 1886. Buhler, G. (trans.), Manusmṛti. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Matilal, B. K. 1985. Logic, Language and Reality. Motilal Benarsidass, Delhi.Google Scholar
Moody, H. R. 1991. The Meaning of Life in Old Age. In Jecker, N. S. (ed.), Aging and Ethics: Philosophical Problems in Gerontology. Humana Press, Clifton NJ, 51–92.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1991. The Absurd. In Jecker, N. S. (ed.), Aging and Ethics: Philosophical Problems in Gerontology. Humana Press, Clifton NJ, 375–388.Google Scholar
Śańkha, . 1906. Dutt, M. N. (ed.) Śańkha Samhitā. H. C. Dass, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Śatapata Brāhmana. 1879. Eggeling, J. (trans.). Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thambiah, J. 1982, 1988. The renouncer: his individuality and his community. In Madan, T. N. (ed.), Way of Life: King, Householder, Renouncer: Essays in honour of Louis Dumont. Motilal Bernarsidass, Delhi.Google Scholar
Thapar, R. 1979. Dissent and protest in the early Indian tradition. Studies in History, 1.2, 177–196.Google Scholar
Thapar, R. 1982, 1988. The householder and the renouncer in the Buddhist and Brahmanical traditions. In Madan, T. N. (ed.), Way of Life: King, Householder, Renouncer: Essays in honour of Louis Dumont. Motilal Benarsidass, Delhi.Google Scholar
Yājñavalkya, . 1906. Dutt, M. N. (ed.). Yājñavalkya Samhitā. H. C. Dass, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Vasiṣṭha, . 1906. Vasiṣṭha Samhitā. Dutt, M. N. (ed.). H. C. Dass, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Vātsyāyana, . 1919. Kāmasūtra. Sastri, G. D. (ed.). Kashi Sanskrit Series, Benares.Google Scholar
Vyāsa, . 1906. Dutt, M. N. (ed.). Vyāsa Samhitā. H. C. Dass, Calcutta.Google Scholar