Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:15:16.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

E-scaping the ageing body? Computer technologies and embodiment in later life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2010

CHRISTINA E. BUSE*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
*
Address for correspondence:Christina Buse, Centre for International Research on Care, Labour and Equalities (CIRCLE), School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, UK E-mail: c.buse@leeds.ac.uk.

Abstract

This paper explores the embodied dimensions of computer and internet use in later life, and examines how technology use relates to constructions and experiences of the ageing body. It is argued that previous research on technology use and embodiment has neglected older bodies, in contrast to research on gender and disability. Furthermore, while earlier theorisations presented internet use as disembodied, it is argued that the experience of using such technologies is grounded in our embodiment. In the light of these limitations and arguments for more complete theories of the body, this paper explores how technology use relates to various aspects of embodiment. These issues are examined in the light of data from qualitative interviews and time-use diaries completed by retirees in 17 households in the United Kingdom. By examining the ‘technobiographies’ of these older computer users, it is shown that changes in body techniques are prompted and in some cases required by broader cultural and technological change. The findings evince the process of acquiring computing skills as an embodied competency, and as a form of ‘practical knowledge’ that can only be ‘learned by doing’. These experiences of technology use were embedded within constructions and experiences of ageing bodies. Although the participants drew on discourses of ageing in complex ways, their coding of computer technologies in terms of the competences of youth often reproduced hierarchies between young and old bodies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, B. 1995. Timewatch. Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alm, N., Gregor, P. and Newell, A. F. 2002. Older People and Information Technology are Ideal Partners. Paper presented at the International Conference for Universal Design, 30 November to 4 December 2002, Yokohama, Japan. Available online at http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/nalm/AlmetalUDITpaper.pdf [Accessed 12 February 2010].Google Scholar
Balsamo, A. 1996. Technologies of the Gendered Body. Duke University Press, Raleigh, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Bolin, G. and Westlund, O. 2009. Mobile generations: the role of mobile technologies in shaping Swedish media generations. International Journal of Communication, 3, 108–24.Google Scholar
Bryant, L. 2003. Gendered bodies, gendered knowledges: information technology in everyday farming. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 4, 464–74.Google Scholar
Bytheway, B. and Johnson, J. 2002. Doing diary-based research. In Jamieson, A. and Victor, C. R. (eds), Researching Ageing and Later Life. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 155–74.Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Chambers, D. 1998. The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 1, 7–19.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. 2006. Reflexive Embodiment in Contemporary Society. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK.Google Scholar
Crossley, N. 2007. Researching embodiment by way of body techniques. Sociological Review, 55, 1, 8094.Google Scholar
Czaja, S. J and Lee, C. C. 2008. Information technology and older adults. In Sears, A. and Jacko, J. A. (eds), The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook. Taylor and Francis, New York, 777–92.Google Scholar
Dickinson, A. and Hill, R. L. 2007. Keeping in touch: talking to older people about computers and communication. Educational Gerontology, 33, 8, 613–30.Google Scholar
Dourish, P. 2001. Where the Action Is. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dutton, W. H. and Helsper, E. J. 2007. The Internet in Britain: 2007. Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford. Available online at: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/microsites/oxis/publications.cfm [Accessed 28 March 2008].Google Scholar
Featherstone, M. 1995. Post-bodies, aging, and virtual reality. In Featherstone, M. and Wernick, A. (eds), Images of Ageing: Cultural Representations of Later Life. Sage, London, 227–44.Google Scholar
Featherstone, M. and Hepworth, M. 1991. The mask of ageing and the postmodern lifecourse. In Featherstone, M., Hepworth, M. and Turner, B. S. (eds), The Body. Sage, London, 371–89.Google Scholar
Garde-Hansen, J. 2008. Look at my digital body? The older woman in Sagazone. Paper presented at the conference Relaunch: Ageing, Body and Society Study Group, 25 July, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Haddon, L. and Silverstone, R. 1996. Information and communication technologies and the young elderly. SPRU-CICT Report 13, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. Available online at http://www.mot.chalmers.se/dept/tso/haddon/leshaddon.htm [Accessed 20 May 2007].Google Scholar
Hawthorne, S. 1999. Cyborgs, virtual bodies and organic bodies: theoretical feminist responses. In Hawthorne, S. and Klein, R. (eds), Cyberfeminism: Connectivity, Critique, and Creativity. Spinifex, North Melbourne, Australia, 213–49.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. 2005. My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Henwood, F., Kennedy, H. and Miller, N. (eds)2001. Cyborg Lives? Women's Technobiographies. Raw Nerve Books, York, UK.Google Scholar
Hill, R., Beyon-Davis, P. and Williams, M. D. 2008. Older people and Internet engagement: acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use. Information Technology and People, 21, 3, 244–66.Google Scholar
Hockey, J. and James, A. 2003. Social Identities Across the Lifecourse. Palgrave, London.Google Scholar
Holloway, S. L. and Valentine, G. 2003. Cyberkids: Children in the Information Age. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Jaeger, B. 2005. Introduction. In Jaeger, B. (ed.), Young Technologies in Old Hands: An International View on Senior Citizens Utilization of ICT. DJOF Publishing, Copenhagen, 9–23.Google Scholar
Katz, S. 2000. Busy bodies: activity, ageing and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 2, 135–52.Google Scholar
Katz, S. 2001. Growing older without ageing? Positive ageing, anti-ageism, and anti-ageing. Generations, 25, 4, 2832.Google Scholar
Katz, S. and Marshall, B. 2003. New sex for old: lifestyle, consumerism and the ethics of ageing well. Journal of Aging Studies, 17, 1, 3–16.Google Scholar
Laliberte-Rudman, D. 2006. Shaping the active, autonomous and responsible modern retiree: an analysis of discursive technologies and their links with neo-liberal political rationality. Ageing & Society, 26, 2, 181201.Google Scholar
Laz, C. 2003. Age embodied. Journal of Aging Studies, 17, 4, 503–19.Google Scholar
Lin, M. C., Hummert, M. L. and Harwood, J. 2004. Representation of age identities in on-line discourse. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 3, 261–74.Google Scholar
Lupton, D. 1995. The embodied computer/user. In Featherstone, M. and Burrows, R. (eds), Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk. Sage, London, 97–112.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 1979. Sociology and Psychology: Essays. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Moser, I. 2006. Disability and the promises of technology: technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal. Information, Communication and Society, 9, 3, 373–95.Google Scholar
Narvaez, R. F. 2006. Embodiment, time and collective memory. Body and Society, 12, 3, 5173.Google Scholar
Östlund, B. 2002. The deconstruction of a target group for IT-innovations: elderly users' technological needs and attitudes towards new IT. Nätverket – Kulturforskning i Uppsala, 11, 7793.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Anchor, New York.Google Scholar
Rama, M. D., Riddler, H. and Bourma, H. B. 2001. Technology generation and age in using layered user interfaces. Gerontechnology, 1, 1, 2540.Google Scholar
Reed, D. 2008. The performativity of volunteer-based telecare service. In Loader, B. D., Hardey, M. and Keeble, L. (eds), Digital Welfare for the Third Age. Routledge, London, 112–31.Google Scholar
Richardson, M., Weaver, K. and Zorn, T. E. 2005. ‘Getting on’: older New Zealanders' perceptions of computing. New Media and Society, 7, 2, 5470.Google Scholar
Saunders, E. J. 2004. Maximising computer use among the elderly in rural senior centers. Educational Gerontology, 30, 7, 573–85.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., Furlong, J. and Maddon, L. 2003. Older adults' use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing & Society, 23, 5, 561–82.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N. 2004. The information age: a qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 4, 369–84.Google Scholar
Shilling, C. 2003. The Body and Social Theory. Second edition, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Shilling, C. 2005. The Body in Culture, Technology and Society. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E. and Morley, D. 1991. Listening to a long conversation: an ethnographic approach to the study of information and communication technologies in the home. Cultural Studies, 5, 2, 207–27.Google Scholar
Slegers, K., van Boxtel, M. and Jolles, J. 2009. The efficiency of using everyday technological devices by older adults: the role of cognitive functions. Ageing & Society, 29, 2, 309–25.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. 1995. Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In Smith, J. A., Harre, R. and van Lagenhove, L. (eds), Rethinking Methods in Psychology. Sage, London, 9–26.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. 2004. The body, gender, and age: feminist insights in social gerontology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 1, 5973.Google Scholar
Valentine, G. 1999. Doing household research: interviewing couples together and apart. Area, 31, 1, 6774.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. 2004. Body and Soul. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Westerhof, G. J., Harink, K., Van Selm, M., Strick, M. and Van Baaren, R. 2010. Filling a missing link: the influence of portrayals of older characters in television commercials on the memory performance of older adults. Ageing & Society, 30, 6, forthcoming.Google Scholar
White, M. 2006. Where do you want to sit today? Computer programmers' static bodies and disability. Information, Communication and Society, 9, 3, 396416.Google Scholar
Williams, S. J. and Bendelow, G. 1998. The Lived Body: Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Woodward, K. 1991. Ageing and its Discontents. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar