Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:30:48.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lifestyle and Ageing

Three Traditions in Lifestyle Research†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Rex Taylor  and
Graeme Ford
Graeme Ford
Affiliation:
MRC Medical Sociology Unit, Institute of Medical Sociology, Westbum Road, Aberdeen AB9 2ZE, Scotland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the nature, usage and potential of the concept of lifestyle. It concentrates on usage in social gerontology and specifically on the way in which it has been used by three teams of American researchers. Its overall aim is to discover guidelines for establishing the lifestyle concept on a sounder methodological footing.

The paper begins with a discussion of diversity within the elderly population and it identifies the need for a systematic conceptual scheme for describing the social life of the individual. It examines the relationship between lifestyle and social class and concludes that they represent complementary rather than competing approaches. The paper goes on to explore three definitions of life-style - as structure, content and meaning - and compares and contrasts these three alternative approaches. The difference between ‘nominal’ and ‘real’ definitions is discussed and the paper ends with a summary account of the way in which the concept has been operationalized in a continuing British study.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , November 1981 , pp. 329 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 For a good example see Barber, B., Social Stratification, Harcourt Brace, New York, 1958Google Scholar. He writes, p. 138, ‘A “style of life” is a closely interwoven set of activities and possessions that are correlated with and become symbolic of membership in a social class’.

2 Gerth, H. and Mills, C. W., Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Oxford University Press, 1946, p. 193.Google Scholar

3 Veblen, T., The Theory of the Leisure Class, The Modern Library, New York, 1934.Google Scholar

4 Warner, W. L. and Meeker, M., Social Class in America, Harper, Chicago, 1960.Google Scholar

5 Valentine, C. A., Culture and Poverty, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1968.Google Scholar

6 We are particularly thinking of studies in the sociology of deviance and occupations by Everett Hughes, Paul Cressey, William Whyte, Howard Becker, Ray Gold, Donald Roy, et al.

7 Havighurst, R., ‘The Leisure Activities of the Middle Aged’, American Journal of Sociology, 63, 1957–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Leisure and Lifestyle’, American Journal of Sociology, 64, 1958–1959.

8 Segnit, S. and Broadbent, S., ‘Life style Research’, European Research, 1, 1 and 2, 1973Google Scholar

9 Fontana, A., The Last Frontier: The Social Meaning of Growing Old, London, Sage, 1977.Google Scholar

10 Jacobs, R. H., ‘A Typology of Older American Women’, Social Policy, 7, 3, 1976.Google Scholar

11 In addition to Fontana, op cit., see also Keith-Ross, J., Old People, New Lives, Chicago University Press, 1977Google Scholar; Hochschild, A. R., The Unexpected Community, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice-Hall, 1973Google Scholar; Hazan, H., The Limbo People, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar

12 Abrams, M., The Elderly: An overview of Current British Social Research, Centre for Policy on Ageing, London, 1978.Google Scholar

13 For one of the most brilliant and extended analyses of cohort differences, see Uhlenberg, P., ‘Demographic Change and Problems of the Aged’, in Riley, W. W., Aging from Birth to Death, Colorado, Westview Press, 1979.Google Scholar

14 Mathews, S. H., The Social World of Old Women, London, Sage, 1979.Google Scholar

15 For the most recent statement along these lines, see Walker, A., ‘Towards a Political Economy of Old Age’, Ageing and Society, 1, Pt 1, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Abrams, M., Three Score Years and Ten, Mitcham, Age Concern, 1978.Google Scholar

17 see Johnson, M. L., ‘That was your life: a biographical approach to later life’, in Munnichs, J. M. A. and van den Heuval, W. J. A. (eds) Dependency or Independency in Old Age, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.Google ScholarPubMed

18 Williams, R. H. and Wirths, C. G., Lives Through the Years, Chicago, Aldine-Atherton, 1965.Google Scholar

19 Lowenthal, M., Thurner, M. and Chiriboga, D., Four Stages of Life, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1976.Google Scholar

20 Maas, H. S. and Kuyper, J. A., From Thirty to Seventy, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1977.Google Scholar

21 Bott, E., Family and Social Network, London, Tavistock, 1957.Google Scholar

22 Miller, S. M., ‘The American Lower Classes: a typological approach’, Sociology and Social Research, 48, 3, 1964.Google Scholar

23 Rapoport, R. and Rapoport, R. N., Leisure and the Family Life Cycle, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.Google Scholar

24 Thomae, H., ‘Bonn Longitudinal Study of Ageing’, Contributions to Human Development, 3, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Lazarus, R., ‘The Stress and Coping Paradigm’, mimeo, privately circulated, 1979.Google Scholar

26 Antonovsky, A., Health, Stress and Coping, London, Jossey-Bass, 1979.Google Scholar