Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:11:50.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-term care system in Taiwan: the 2017 major reform and its challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2019

Ming-Jui Yeh Open the ORCID record for Ming-Jui Yeh [Opens in a new window]
Ming-Jui Yeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: ymjyeh@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reviews the past development of the publicly funded long-term care (LTC) system and aims to advance further discussion of LTC in Taiwan. The Ten-year Long-Term Care Plan 2.0 introduced in 2017 calls for a major reform of a publicly funded LTC system in Taiwan. The reform expands on the previous universal tax-based LTC system, allowing for more comprehensive and accessible subsidies on LTC services. This paper provides a brief overview of the political context of the reform and an introduction to the legal basis, financing and delivery mechanisms of the reform plan. To this end, as a preliminary evaluation, this paper identifies major institutional and socio-cultural tensions that could challenge the implementation of the plan. Institutional tensions include the dominant foreign worker caring model, which relies on approximately 220,000 foreign workers to provide LTC services, and the discontinuity between health and social care governance, which leads to a discontinuity between curative and LTC care. Socio-cultural tensions focus on conflicting values in the allocation of responsibility of care and in the understanding of disability between universal social citizenship in the modern state and traditional Confucian ethics. Policy implications of these tensions for the LTC system are then discussed.

Keywords

long-term care reformhealth and social governanceforeign workersocial citizenshipConfucian ethicsLong-term Care Insurance
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 40 , Issue 6 , June 2020 , pp. 1334 - 1351
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, C-F (2015) Insiders and outsiders: policy and care workers in Taiwan's long-term care system. Ageing & Society 36, 2090–2116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y-H and Tsai, M-H (2018) Tax funding source estimated 29.6 billion only 5.8 were collected (January 15) [長照稅源估296億 實收僅58億]. Apple Daily.Google Scholar
Cheng, T-M (2015) Reflections on the 20th anniversary of Taiwan's single-payer national health insurance system. Health Affairs 34, 502–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chien, Y-C (2018) The struggle for recognition: the politics of migrant care worker policies in Taiwan. Critical Sociology 44, 1147–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, HC (2001) Organization and delivery of long-term care in Taiwan. Journal of Aging & Social Policy 13, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, YJ (2012) End of the era of productivist welfare capitalism? Diverging welfare regimes in East Asia. Asian Journal of Social Science 40, 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, F, Llena-Nozal, A, Mercier, J and Tjadens, F (2011) Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-term Care. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council for Economic Planning and Development, Department of Health, Ministry of the Interior, Council of Labor Affairs, Council of Indigenous Peoples and Veterans Affairs Council (2009) Executive Report on the Planning of Long Term Care Insurance [長期照護保險規劃報告]. Taipei: Council for Economic Planning and Development, Department of Health, Ministry of the Interior, Council of Labor Affairs, Council of Indigenous Peoples, and Veterans Affairs Council.Google Scholar
Cox, R (2004) The path-dependency of an idea: why Scandinavian welfare states remain distinct. Social Policy & Administration 38, 204–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Roit, B and Le Bihan, B (2010) Similar and yet so different: cash-for-care in six European countries’ long-term care policies. Milbank Quarterly 88, 286–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da Roit, B, Le Bihan, B and Österle, A (2007) Long-term care policies in Italy, Austria and France: variations in cash-for-care schemes. Social Policy & Administration 41, 653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, C-Y and Wu, C-L (2010) An innovative participatory method for newly democratic societies: the ‘civic groups forum’ on national health insurance reform in Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine 70, 896–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, ES and Logue, J (2010) Can welfare states be sustained in a global economy? Lessons from Scandinavia. Political Science Quarterly 125, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Executive Yuan (2017) Executive Yuan Passes 10-Year Long-term Care 2.0 Plan (Press release). Taipei: Executive Yuan.Google Scholar
Executive Yuan (2018) Proposed Immigration Bill Promotes Continuous Development (Press release). Taipei: Executive Yuan.Google Scholar
Fu, Y-C, Chang, Y-H, Liao, P-S and Hsieh, S-H (2017) 2016 Taiwan Social Change Survey (Round 7, Year 2) Executive Report [台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫第七期第二次調查計畫執行報告]. Taipei: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, R, Hvinden, B and Schoyen, MA (2015) The Nordic welfare model in the twenty-first century: the bumble-bee still flies! Social Policy & Society 15, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, I (2000) Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia. Political Studies 48, 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, I (2005) East Asian social policy in the wake of the financial crisis: farewell to productivism? Policy & Politics 33, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, B (2002) Interprofessionality in health and social care: the Achilles’ heel of partnership? Journal of Interprofessional Care 16, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, RA and Kane, RL (1987) Long-term Care: Principles, Programs, and Policies. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Kim, JW and Choi, YJ (2012) Farewell to old legacies? The introduction of long-term care insurance in South Korea. Ageing & Society 33, 871–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, MMS (2016) Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Productivist Models of Social Policy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kim, Y-M (2008) Beyond East Asian welfare productivism in South Korea. Policy & Politics 36, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C-H (2017) Ready for hospital discharge? The first step away from the predicament of long term care (April 12) [出院，準備好了嗎？走出照顧困境的第一步]. Common Health Magazine (Taipei).Google Scholar
Lee, Y-J and Ku, Y-W (2007) East Asian welfare regimes: testing the hypothesis of the developmental welfare state. Social Policy & Administration 41, 197–212.Google Scholar
Lee, JS and Wang, S-W (1996) Recruiting and managing of foreign workers in Taiwan. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 5, 281–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S-Y, Chun, C-B, Lee, Y-G and Seo, NK (2008) The National Health Insurance system as one type of new typology: the case of South Korea and Taiwan. Health Policy 85, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Y-C, Lin, L-C, Wu, S-C, Cheng, W-H, Fu, L-y and the Long-Term Care Insurance Planning Team of the Department of Health (2013) Planning and prospect of the Long Term Care Insurance in Taiwan [臺灣長期照護保險之規劃與展望]. Community Development Journal (Quarterly) 141, 26–44.Google Scholar
Leutz, WN (1999) Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. Milbank Quarterly 77, 77–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, K-M (2001) Democratization and public participation: the formation of national health insurance policy [民主化與社會成家的公共參與：全民健保的政策形成]. In Hsiao, H-HM and Lin, K-M (eds), Social Welfare Movement in Taiwan [台灣的社會福利運動]. Taipei: Chuliu, 135–175.Google Scholar
Lin, W-I (2014) Problems and solutions after the integration of health and welfare affairs [我國衛生與福利整併後的困境與解決之道]. Community Development Journal (Quarterly) 145, 37–55.Google Scholar
Lin, YY and Huang, CS (2016) Aging in Taiwan: building a society for active aging and aging in place. The Gerontologist 56, 176–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y-H (2011) Taiwan's transformation of Scandinavian universal care and full employment policies and decision-making mechanism [北歐普及照顧與充分就業政策及其決策機制的臺灣轉化]. Journal of Women's and Gender Studies 29, 1–77.Google Scholar
Liu, Y-H (2012) Scandinavian universal care policy and recent development: a critical review from feminist perspective [北歐普及照顧制度的實踐與變革－從女性主義觀點回顧及批判]. Journal of Women's and Gender Studies 31, 75–121.Google Scholar
Lymbery, M (2006) United we stand? Partnership working in health and social care and the role of social work in services for older people. British Journal of Social Work 36, 1119–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Finance (2014) Statistical Analysis of Tobacco and Alcohol Tax and Health and Welfare Surcharge of Tobacco Products [近年菸酒稅與健康福利捐之統計分析]. Taipei: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) (2016) The Ten-year Long Term Care Plan 2.0 Prospectus [長期照顧十年計畫 2.0（106~115年）(核定本)]. Taipei: MOHW. Available at https://www.ey.gov.tw/Upload.aspx?Upload=/RelFile/3499/745134/1051219%E9%95%B7%E7%85%A72.0%E6%A0%B8%E5%AE%9A%E6%9C%AC.pdf.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) (2017) 2016 Taiwan Health and Welfare Report. Taipei: MOHW.Google Scholar
Ministry of Labor (2017) Foreign Care Worker Statistics [外籍看護統計]. Taipei: Ministry of Labor.Google Scholar
Ministry of the Interior Affairs (MOI) (2007) The Ten-year Long Term Care Plan Prospectus [我國長期照顧十年計畫－大溫暖社會福利套案之旗艦計畫（核定本）]. Taipei: MOI.Google Scholar
Morone, JA (2000) Citizens or shoppers? Solidarity under siege. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 25, 959–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadash, P and Shih, Y-C (2013) Introducing social insurance for long-term care in Taiwan: key issues. International Journal of Social Welfare 22, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) (2016) National Health Insurance in Taiwan 2016–2017 Annual Report. Taipei: NHIA, Ministry of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) (2017) Online Database of the Fee Schedule and Reference List for Medical Services. Taipei: NHIA, Ministry of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
National Immigration Agency (2017) Statistics of Foreign Residents with Valid Visa in Taiwan [臺灣地區現持有效居留證(在臺)外僑居留人數統計]. Taipei: National Immigration Agency.Google Scholar
Peng Wan-Ru Foundation (2017) Introduction to Home Care Service [居家陪伴照顧]. Taipei: Peng Wan-Ru Foundation. Available at https://www.pwr.org.tw/service/accompany.Google Scholar
Ranci, C and Pavolini, E (2015) Not all that glitters is gold: long-term care reforms in the last two decades in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 25, 270–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltman, RB (2004) Social health insurance in perspective: the challenge of sustaining stability. In Saltman, RB, Busse, R and Figueras, J (eds), Social Health Insurance Systems in Western Europe. New York, NY: Open University Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Saltman, RB and Bergman, SE (2005) Renovating the commons: Swedish health care reforms in perspective. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 30, 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltman, RB and Ferroussier-Davis, O (2000) The concept of stewardship in health policy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78, 732–739.Google ScholarPubMed
Saltman, RB, Hagen, TP and Vrangbaek, K (2015) New strategies for the care of older people in Denmark and Norway. Eurohealth: Quarterly of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies 21, 23–26.Google Scholar
Saraceno, C and Keck, W (2010) Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies 12, 675–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, AE, Winkelmann, J, Rodrigues, R and Leichsenring, KAI (2015) Lessons for regulating informal markets and implications for quality assurance – the case of migrant care workers in Austria. Ageing & Society 36, 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, J (2015) Labour markets, care regimes and foreign care worker policies in East Asia. Social Policy & Administration 49, 376–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szebehely, M and Meagher, G (2018) Nordic eldercare – weak universalism becoming weaker? Journal of European Social Policy 28, 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szebehely, M and Trydegård, G-B (2012) Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition. Health & Social Care in the Community 20, 300–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, I-w (2015) 2016 General Election President Candidate Tsai Ing-wen Long Term Care Policy Platform [2016總統大選蔡英文長期照顧政策主張]. Available at http://iing.tw/posts/80.Google Scholar
Tsay, S-F (2016) The Long-term Care 2.0 Version of the Community-based Model in Taiwan. Taipei: Ministry of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
Vabø, M and Szebehely, M (2012) A caring state for all older people. In Anttonen, A, Haikio, L and Kolbeinn, S (eds), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 121–143.Google Scholar
Wang, HH and Tsay, SF (2012) Elderly and long-term care trends and policy in Taiwan: challenges and opportunities for health care professionals. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Science 28, 465–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, J (2004) Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yeh, J-C (2010) A new approach to the question of Confucianism and democracy: an appeal in response to the spread of global capitalism [「儒家與民主」議題的轉向－全球資本主義衝擊下的呼籲]. Taiwanese Journal of Political Science 44, 1–34.Google Scholar
Yu, H-H (2018) Division of long-term care to be established by the Ministry of Health and Welfare Minister Chen: the provisional office is now in place (February 21) [衛福部設長照司 陳時中：籌備處已成立]. Taipei Central News Agency.Google Scholar
Zhang, E (2010) Community, the common good, and public healthcare – Confucianism and its relevance to contemporary China. Public Health Ethics 3, 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar