Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:55:16.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobilising alternative futures: generational accounting and the fiscal politics of ageing in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2018

BEN SPIES-BUTCHER  and
ADAM STEBBING
BEN SPIES-BUTCHER*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
ADAM STEBBING
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Ben Spies-Butcher, Department of Sociology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia E-mail: ben.spies-butcher@mq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Economists typically argue population ageing generates fiscal pressures by restricting the tax base while increasing demands for social spending. Alongside other economic pressures associated with neoliberalism, this dynamic contributes to a politics of ‘enduring austerity’ that limits governments’ fiscal discretion. The politics of population ageing reflects modelling techniques, such as generational accounting (GA), which, anticipating future deficits, create demands for policy action today to address projected intergenerational inequalities. Taking Australia as a case study, this paper explores the politics of GA in public budgetary processes. While existing critiques reject GA by arguing it relies on ‘apocalyptic’ or unreliable demography, we focus on a different kind of contestation, which applies the techniques and even the categories of GA to frame different problems and promote different solutions. We identify three sites of partisan contest that refocus fiscal modelling: including the tax side of the budget equation; comparing the cost of public provision to public subsidies for private programmes; and including the costs of environmental damage. At each site, the future-orientated logic of GA is mobilised to contest the policy implications of austerity. This complicates analysis that financialisation and neoliberalism necessarily ‘de-politicise’ policy by removing state discretion. Instead, we identify an increasingly important, if technocratic, form of political contestation that offers the possibility to promote more egalitarian responses to population ageing.

Keywords

social policypopulation ageinggenerational accountingfinancialisationintergenerational inequalitypension reform
Type
Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 39 , Issue 7 , July 2019 , pp. 1409 - 1435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ablett, J. 1996 a. Generational accounting: an Australian perspective. Review of Income and Wealth, 42, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Ablett, J. 1996 b. Generational accounting and intergenerational balance. Agenda, 3, 4, 407–18.Google Scholar
Auditor General 2008. Preparation of the Tax Expenditures Statement. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J., Gokhale, J. and Kotlikoff, L. J. 1994. Generational accounting: a meaningful way to evaluate fiscal policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 1, 73–94.Google Scholar
Australian Government 2013. Budget Overview 2013–14. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Government 2016. Budget Overview 2016–17. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Labor Party 2015. Fairer Super Plan. Australian Labor Party, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Taxation Office 2016. Medicare Levy Surcharge and Private Health Insurance Rebate Thresholds Frozen. Australian Government, Canberra. Available online at https://www.ato.gov.au/General/New-legislation/In-detail/Direct-taxes/Income-tax-for-individuals/Medicare-levy-surcharge-and-private-health-insurance-rebate-thresholds-frozen/ [Accessed 1 June 2017].Google Scholar
Barton, A. 2001. Public choice theory and economic rationalism: the basis of new public management. In Jones, L., Guthrie, J. and Steane, P. (eds), Learning from International Public Management Reform. Emerald Group, Amsterdam, 571–88.Google Scholar
Bessant, J., Emslie, C. and Watts, R. 2011. Accounting for future generations: inter-generational equity in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70, 2, 143–55.Google Scholar
Bolch, B. W. and Lyons, H. 1993. Apocalypse Not: Science, Economics, and Environmentalism. Cato Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. 2004. The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coorey, P. 2015. Tax options put back on table. Australian Financial Review, 22 September.Google Scholar
Coorey, P. 2017. Scott Morrison resisting pressure on CGT, negative gearing. Australian Financial Review, 5 April.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N. L., Dickson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D. E., Glenn, L. M., Hudspeth, T., Mahoney, D., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, S. A. T., Rizzo, D. M., Simpatico, T. and Snapp, R. 2007. Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61, 2, 267–76.Google Scholar
Costello, P. 2006. A Plan to Simplify and Streamline Superannuation. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Daley, J. and Woods, D. 2014. The wealth of generations. Grattan Institute Report 2014–1, Grattan Institute, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Daley, J. and Woods, D. 2016. Hot property: negative gearing and capital gains tax reform. Grattan Institute Report 2016-8, Grattan Institute, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Davidson, S. 2007. Comment 20/07/2007. Available online at http://andrewnorton.info/blog/2007/07/20/don't-tax-and-spend/ [Accessed 1 February 2008].Google Scholar
Doughney, J. and King, J. 2006. Rhetoric and reality: neo-liberal ideology and ageing in Australia, 2003–2050. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 58, 25–43.Google Scholar
Economic Planning Advisory Council (EPAC) 1994. Australia's ageing society. Background Paper 37, EPAC, Canberra.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. 2006. ‘The best friend Medicare ever had’? Policy narratives and changes in Coalition health policy. Health Sociology Review, 15, 2, 132–43.Google Scholar
Encel, S. and Ozanne, E. 2007. The politics of ageing. In Borowski, A., Encel, S. and Ozanne, E. (eds), Longevity and Social Change in Australia. UNSW Press, Sydney, 296–315.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (eds) 2015. Social Policy in Times of Austerity: Global Economic Crisis and the New Politics of Welfare. Polity Press, London, 87–112.Google Scholar
Fine, M. 2014. Intergenerational perspectives on ageing, economics and globalisation. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 33, 4, 220–5.Google Scholar
Fleming, C. and Peroni, R. J. 2008. Reinvigorating tax expenditure analysis and its international dimension. Virginia Tax Review, 27, 3, 437–562.Google Scholar
Foster, C. 1988. Towards a national retirement incomes policy. Social Security Review Issues Paper 6, Department of Social Security, Canberra.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. and Stutzer, A. 2010. Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Well-being. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Gallagher, P. and Rothman, G. 2006. Australian Government Research on Ageing: Potential Impacts and Policy Responses. ANU, Canberra.Google Scholar
Garnaut, R. 2008. The Climate Change Review. Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Gee, E. M. 2002. Misconceptions and misapprehensions about population ageing. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 4, 750–3.Google Scholar
Gee, E. and Gutman, G. M. 2000. The Overselling of Population Ageing: Apocalyptic Demography, Intergenerational Challenges, and Social Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gingrich, J. 2011. Making Markets in the Welfare State: The Politics of Varying Market Reforms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Groenhart, L. and Burke, T. 2014. What has happened to Australia's public housing? Thirty years of policy and outcomes, 1981 to 2011. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 49, 2, 127–49.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. 1998. Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector – rhetoric or reality. Financial Accountability & Management, 14, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Gutman, G. M. 2010. Population ageing and apocalyptic demography: separating fact from fiction. In Knudsen, L. B. and Olsen, A. L. (eds), Our Demographic Future – A Challenge: On the Need for Demographic Analyses. Scandinavian Population Studies 14, Aalborg Oest, Denmark, 11–36.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henry, K. 2009. Australia's Future Tax System: Final Report. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Higgs, P. and Gilleard, C. 2010. Generational conflict, consumption and the ageing welfare state in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 30, 8, 1439–51.Google Scholar
Howard, C. 1997. The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Howe, A. and Healy, J. 2005. Generational justice in aged care policy in Australia and the United Kingdom. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 24, June supplement, S12–18.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. B. 1978. The ‘graying’ of the federal budget and its consequences for old-age policy. The Gerontologist, 18, 5, 428–40.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. B. 2014. Contemporary challenges to aging policy. In Hudson, R. B. (ed.), The New Politics of Old Age Policy. Third edition, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 3–20.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. and Meyer, L. A. (eds). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Wren, A. 1998. Equality, employment, and budgetary restraint: the trilemma of the service economy. World Politics, 50, 4, 507–46.Google Scholar
Jericho, G. 2015. Joe Hockey's budget has wrecked the chances of a fair tax review. The Guardian, 18 May. Available online at https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2015/may/18/joe-hockeys-budget-has-wrecked-the-chances-of-a-fair-tax-review [Accessed 4 October 2017].Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 2014. Neoliberalism, finance-dominated accumulation and enduring austerity: a cultural political economy perspective. In Farnsworth, K. and Irving, Z. (eds), Social Policy in Times of Austerity: Global Economic Crisis and the New Politics of Welfare. Polity Press, London, 87–112.Google Scholar
Knott, M. 2015. ‘Deep regret’: Dr Karl Kruszelnicki to hand over Intergenerational Report pay. Sydney Morning Herald, 16 April. Available online at http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/deep-regret-dr-karl-kruszelnicki-to-hand-over-intergenerational-report-pay-20150415-1mm3i0.html [Accessed 4 October 2017].Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, L. 1992. Generational Accounting: Knowing Who Pays, and When, for What We Spend. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lee, R. D. and Mason, A. 2011. Generational economics in a changing world. Population and Development Review, 37, supplement, 115–42.Google Scholar
Lemoine, B. 2017. Measuring and restructuring the state. In King, D. and Le Gales, P. (eds), Reconfiguring European States in Crisis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 313–30.Google Scholar
Liberal Party 2013. The Coalition's Policy for Superannuation. September, Brian Loughnane, Canberra. Available online at http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/library/partypol/2717533/upload_binary/2717533.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22library/partypol/2717533%22 [Accessed 4 October 2017].Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. [1798] 1826. An Essay on the Principle of Population: or, a View of its Past and Present Effects on Human Happiness. Sixth edition, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Markandya, A. and Pearce, D. W. 1988. Environmental Considerations and the Choice of the Discount Rate in Developing Countries. World Bank Policy Planning and Research Staff, Environment Department, Chicago.Google Scholar
McAuley, I. 2005. Private health insurance: still muddling through. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 12, 2, 159–78.Google Scholar
McDonald, I. 2005. Intergenerational equity. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 12, 1, 3–18.Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. and Behrens, W. W. III 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Potomac Associates, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Minkler, M. and Robertson, A. 1991. Generational equity and public health policy: a critique of ‘age/race war’. Journal of Public Health Policy, 12, 3, 324–44.Google Scholar
Morrison, S. 2016. Budget speech. Australian Government, Canberra. Available online at http://www.budget.gov.au/2016-17/content/speech/html/speech.htm [Accessed 29 January 2018].Google Scholar
Murray, D. 2014. Financial System Inquiry: Final Report. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
National Commission of Audit 1996. National Commission of Audit Report to the Commonwealth Government. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Orenstein, M. 2008. Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2006. Live Longer, Work Longer. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2009. OECD Factbook 2009. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Padilla, E. 2002. Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Ecological Economics, 41, 1, 69–83.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Budget Office 2015. Removing Unfair Tax Breaks. Parliamentary Budget Office, Canberra.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. 1998. Irresistible forces, immovable objects: post-industrial welfare states confront permanent austerity. Journal of European Social Policy, 5, 4, 539–60.Google Scholar
Raffelhüschen, B. 1999. Generational accounting in Europe. American Economic Review, 89, 2, 167–70.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. 1996. Beyond apocalyptic demography: towards a moral economy of interdependence. Ageing & Society, 17, 4, 425–46.Google Scholar
Schafer, A. and Streeck, W. 2013. Introduction: politics in the age of austerity. In Streeck, W. and Schafer, A. (eds), Politics in the Age of Austerity. Wiley, London, 1–25.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 2003. Tax Expenditures: The $30 Billion Twilight Zone of Government Spending, Department of Parliamentary Library, Canberra.Google Scholar
Spies-Butcher, B. 2010. The cost of a market solution: examining the Garnaut proposal for emissions trading. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 66, 51–70.Google Scholar
Spies-Butcher, B. 2014. Markets, universalism and equity: Medicare's dual role in the Australian welfare state. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 73, 18–40.Google Scholar
Spies-Butcher, B. and Stebbing, A. 2011. Population ageing and tax reform in a dual welfare state? Social Policy & Administration, 22, 3, 45–64.Google Scholar
Stebbing, A. 2015. The devil's in the detail: the shift to private retirement incomes. In Meagher, G. and Goodwin, S. (eds), Markets, Rights and Power in Australian Social Policy. Sydney University Press, Sydney, 115–52.Google Scholar
Stebbing, A. and Spies-Butcher, B. 2010. Universal welfare by other means? Social tax expenditures and the Australian dual welfare state. Journal of Social Policy, 39, 4, 585–606.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. Verso, London.Google Scholar
Surrey, S. 1973. Pathways to Tax Reform: The Concept of Tax Expenditures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Swan, W. 2010. Australia to 2050: Future Challenges – Launch of the 2010 Intergenerational Report. National Press Club, Canberra.Google Scholar
Swan, W. 2014. The Good Fight: Six Years, Two Prime Ministers and Staring Down the Great Recession. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. 1991. Selfish Generations: The Ageing of New Zealand's Welfare State. Bridget Williams Books, Wellington.Google Scholar
Treasury 2002. Intergenerational Report 2002–03. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Treasury 2007. Intergenerational Report 2007. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Treasury 2010. Intergenerational Report 2010. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Treasury 2012. Distributional Analysis of Superannuation Taxation Concessions: A Paper to the Superannuation Roundtable. Australian Government, Canberra. Available online at http://www.treasury.gov.au/Policy-Topics/SuperannuationAndRetirement/Distributional-analysis-of-superannuation-taxation-concessions [Accessed 24 May 2017].Google Scholar
Treasury 2015 a. Tax Expenditure Statement 2015. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Treasury 2015 b. Intergenerational Report 2015. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Treasury 2015 c. Re:think: Better Tax, Better Australia. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
Treasury 2017. Budget Overview 2017–2018. Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
United Nations 2015. World Population Ageing 2015. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Walker, A. 1990. The economic ‘burden’ of ageing and the prospect of intergenerational conflict. Ageing & Society, 10, 4, 377–96.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. and Rhodes, A. 2011. A critical assessment of generational accounting and its contribution to the generational equity debate. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 6, 1, 33–57.Google Scholar
Wilson, S., Spies-Butcher, B., Stebbing, A. and St John, S. 2013. Wage-earners’ welfare after economic reform: refurbishing, retrenching or hollowing out social protection in Australia and New Zealand? Social Policy & Administration, 43, 5, 508–25.Google Scholar
World Bank 1994. Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Yates, J. and Bradbury, B. 2010. Home ownership as a (crumbling) fourth pillar of social insurance in Australia. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25, 2, 193–211.Google Scholar
Yates, J., Kendig, H., Phillips, B., Milligan, V. and Tanton, R. 2008. Sustaining fair shares: the Australian housing system and intergenerational sustainability. AHURI Final Report 111, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Melbourne.Google Scholar