Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:40:15.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Socioeconomic resources and living arrangements of older adults in Lebanon: who chooses to live alone?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2010

RANIA A. TOHME ,
KATHRYN M. YOUNT ,
SARA YASSINE ,
OLLA SHIDEED  and
ABLA MEHIO SIBAI
RANIA A. TOHME
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
KATHRYN M. YOUNT
Affiliation:
Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
SARA YASSINE
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
OLLA SHIDEED
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
ABLA MEHIO SIBAI*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
*
Address for correspondence: Abla Mehio Sibai, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad el Solh 1107 2020, Beirut, Lebanon. E-mail: ansibai@aub.edu.lb
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During recent decades, Lebanon has experienced demographic and social changes which, coupled with political instability, have led to waves of youth migration and a higher proportion of older adults living alone. This paper uses the 2004 data of the ‘Pan Arab Project for Family Health’ to assess the levels of various living arrangements and to examine the correlates of living alone, with a focus on economic resources. The findings reveal that 12 per cent of older adults in Lebanon lived alone (17.3 per cent of women and 6.2 per cent of men). Financially better-off older adults and those who reported being satisfied with their income were, respectively, 4.4 and 1.7 times significantly more likely to live alone than their counterparts. The incomes of Lebanese older adults were mainly provided by their children (74.8%) and a relatively small share derived from pension schemes. Contrary to findings from other Arab countries, variations in living arrangements among Lebanese older adults seem to follow the western model whereby wealthier older individuals are more likely to live alone and to be residentially independent. Further studies are warranted to examine to what extent this trend is the result of past migration of adult children who are now established elsewhere and sending remittances home.

Keywords

living arrangementsLebanonmodernisationolder adultssocioeconomic resourcesgender differences
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amery, H. A. and Anderson, W. P. 2008. International migration and remittances to a Lebanese village. Canadian Geographer, 39, 1, 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, G. R. and Hennink, M. M. 1992. The circumstances and contributions of older persons in three Asian countries: preliminary results of a cross-national study. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7, 3, 127–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angel, R., Angel, J. L. and Himes, C. L. 1992. Minority group status, health transitions, and community living arrangements among the elderly. Research on Aging, 14, 4, 496–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, T. K. and Mathews, B. J. 1987. Household formation in developed countries. Population and Development Review, 13, 1, 137–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, J. A. and Mutchler, J. E. 2007. Residential independence among older persons: community and individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review, 26, 1, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaaya, M., Sibai, A. M., Tabbal, N., Chemaitelly, H., El Roueiheb, Z. and Slim, Z. N. 2010. Work and mental health: the case of older men living in underprivileged communities in Lebanon. Ageing & Society, 30, 1, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, A. and Marsh, R. 1999. Changes in living arrangement and familial support for the elderly in Taiwan, 1963–1991. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30, 3, 523–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chucks, M. J. 2002. Determinants of living arrangements of Lesotho's elderly female population. Journal of International Women's Studies, 3, 2, 2–24.Google Scholar
Costa, D. 1997. Displacing the family: union army pensions and elderly living arrangements. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 2, 1269–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, D. L. 1999. A house of her own: old age assistance and the living arrangements of older nonmarried women. Journal of Public Economics, 72, 1, 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Vanzo, J. and Chan, A. 1994. Living arrangements of older Malaysians: who co-resides with their adult children? Demography, 31, 1, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) 2008. Situation Analysis of Population Aging in Arab Countries: The Way Forward Towards Implementation of MIPAA. ESCWA, Beirut. Available online at http://www.escwa.un.org/information/publications/edit/upload/sdd-08-tp2-e.pdf [Accessed November 2008].Google Scholar
Edmonds, E., Mammen, K. and Miller, D. L. 2004. Rearranging the Family? Income Support and Elderly Living Arrangements in a Low Income Country. Working Paper 10306, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w10306 [Accessed November 2008].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldemire, D. 1997. The Jamaican elderly: a socio-economic perspective and policy implications. Social and Economic Studies, 46, 1, 75–93.Google Scholar
Englehardt, G. V., Gruber, J. and Perry, C. D. 2002. Social Security and Elderly Living Arrangements. Working Paper 8911, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w8911 [Accessed November 2008].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenberg, E., Chan, A. and Ofstedal, M. B. 2002. Stability and change in living arrangements in Indonesia, Singapore and Taiwan, 1993–99. Population Studies, 56, 2, 201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldscheider, F. K. and Lawton, L. 1998. Family experiences and erosion of support for intergenerational co-residence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 3, 623–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, W. J. 1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns. Free Press of Glencoe, New York.Google Scholar
Hirschman, C. and Huu Minh, N. 2002. Tradition and change in Vietnamese family structure in the Red River Delta. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 4, 1063–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hospers, A. P. N., Chahine, L. M. and Chemali, Z. 2007. Health care delivery systems for older adults: how do the Netherlands and Lebanon compare? Social Science and Medicine, 65, 10, 1979–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, M. E. and Waite, L. J. 2002. Health in household context: living arrangements and health in late middle-age. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 1, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iacovou, M. 2000. The Living Arrangements of Elderly Europeans. Working Paper 2000-9, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. Available online at http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/pubs/workpaps/pdf/2000-09.pdf [Accessed November 2008].Google Scholar
Kamo, Y. and Zhou, M. 1994. Living arrangements of elderly Chinese and Japanese in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 3, 544–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karagiannaki, E. 2005. Changes in the Living Arrangements of Elderly People in Greece: 1974–1999. Research Paper CASE104, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics, London. Available online at http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/CASEpaper104.pdf [Accessed November 2008].Google Scholar
Khadr, Z. A. 1997. Living arrangements and social support systems of the older population in Egypt. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Kinsella, K. and Velkoff, V. A. 2001. An Aging World: 2001. Report P95/01-1, US Census Bureau, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Knodel, J. and Chayovan, N. 1997. Family support and living arrangements of Thai elderly. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12, 1, 1–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Kramarow, E. A. 1995. The elderly who live alone in the United States: historical perspectives on household change. Demography, 32, 3, 335–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kritz, M. M., Gurak, D. T. and Chen, L. 2000. Elderly immigrants: their composition and living arrangements. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 27, 1, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. J., Parish, W. L. and Willis, R. J. 1994. Sons, daughters, and intergenerational support in Taiwan. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 4, 1010–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. R. and Bian, F. 1999. Family values and co-residence with married children in urban China. Social Forces, 77, 4, 1253–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. R., Bian, F. and Bian, Y. 1998. Tradition and change in the urban Chinese family: the case of living arrangements. Social Forces, 76, 3, 851–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, R., Due, P., Modvig, J., Holstein, B. E., Damsgaard, M. T. and Andersen, P. K. 2002. Cohabitation and marital status as predictors of mortality: an eight year follow-up study. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 4, 673–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahasneh, S. M. 2000. Survey of the health of the elderly in Jordan. Medical Journal of Islamic Academy of Sciences, 13, 1, 39–48.Google Scholar
Mancunovich, D. J., Easterlin, R. A., Crimmins, E. M. and Schaeffer, C. M. 1995. Echoes of the baby boom and bust: recent and prospective changes in living alone among elderly widows in the United States. Demography, 32, 1, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, K. O. 1992. Family change and support of the elderly in Asia: what do we know? Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 7, 1, 13–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGarry, K. and Schoeni, R. F. 2000. Social security, economic growth, and the rise in elderly widows' independence in the twentieth century. Demography, 37, 2, 221–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, R. T., Fuchs, V. R. and Scott, S. R. 1980. Changes in the propensity to live alone: 1950–1976. Demography, 17, 1, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, Y. L., Berkman, L. F., Colditz, G. A. and Kawachi, I. 2001. Living arrangements, social integration, and change in functional health status. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 2, 123–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natividad, J. N. and Cruz, G. T. 1997. Patterns in living arrangements and familial support for the elderly in the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Population Journal (Bangkok), 12, 1, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nawar, L., Lloyd, C. B. and Ibrahim, B. 1995. Women's autonomy and gender roles in Egyptian families. In Obermeyer, C. M. (ed.), Family, Gender, and Population in the Middle East: Policies in Context. American University in Cairo Press, Cairo, 147–78.Google Scholar
Ratha, D. and Xu, Z. 2008. Migration and Remittances Factbook 2008. World Bank, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeni, R. F. 1998. Reassessing the decline in parent–child old-age co-residence during the twentieth century. Demography, 35, 3, 307–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, N. M., Yount, K. M., Shah, M. A. and Menon, I. 2002. Living arrangements of older women and men in Kuwait. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 17, 1, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibai, A. M., Beydoun, M. A. and Tohme, R. A. 2009. Living arrangements of ever-married older Lebanese women: is living with married children advantageous? Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 24, 1, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibai, A. M., Sen, K., Beydoun, M. and Saxena, P. 2004. Population ageing in Lebanon: current status, future prospects and implications for policy. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82, 3, 219–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Sibai, A. M., Yount, K. M. and Fletcher, A. 2007. Marital status and living arrangements as predictors of mortality among middle-aged and older men and women during wartime in Beirut: gains and liabilities. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1, 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1995. Stability and change in temporal distance between the elderly and their children. Demography, 32, 1, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinunu, M., Yount, K. M. and El Afify, N. A. 2009. Informal and formal long-term care for frail older adults in Cairo, Egypt: family caregiving decisions in a context of social change. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 24, 1, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) 2006. At a Glance Lebanon Statistics. UNICEF, New York. Available online at http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/lebanon_statistics.html [Accessed November 2008].Google Scholar
Wilmoth, J. M. 2001. Living arrangements among older immigrants in the United States. The Gerontologist, 41, 2, 228–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, D. A. 1994. The elderly and their kin: patterns of availability and access. In Martin, L. G. and Preston, S. H. (eds), Demography of Aging. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 146–94.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. 1972. Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. L. 1999. Living arrangement of the elderly in Taiwan. Journal of Population Studies (Taiwan), 20, 1, 167–83.Google Scholar
Yount, K. M. 2005. The patriarchal bargain and intergenerational co-residence in Egypt. Sociological Quarterly, 46, 1, 139–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yount, K. M. 2009. Gender and intergenerational coresidence in Egypt and Tunisia. Population Research and Policy Review, 28, 5, 615–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yount, K. M. and Khadr, Z. 2008. Gender, social change and living arrangements among older Egyptians during the 1990's. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 1, 201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar