Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:13:59.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Farm-Level Evaluation of Alternative Policy Approaches to Reduce Nitrate Leaching from Midwest Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Scott M. Swinton  and
David S. Clark
Scott M. Swinton
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University
David S. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University
Get access

Abstract

Policies to reduce nitrate leaching are evaluated using a mixed integer linear programming model of a representative Michigan cash grain farm. At spring 1993 prices, elimination of the current deficiency payment program is found to be more efficient at reducing leaching than a nitrogen input tax, a tax credit on biologically fixed nitrogen, a rotation payment, or obligatory use of the Integrated Farm Management Program Option (IFMPO). However, elimination of the deficiency payment program would significantly reduce farm income. Modeling risk management and nitrate leaching dynamics are useful extensions of this research, as is estimating the benefits from averting nitrate leaching.

Type
Agricultural, Resource, and Environmental Policies in the 1990s
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , April 1994 , pp. 66 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, Bruce A. “The Effects of Uncertainty on Optimal Nitrogen Applications.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(July 1992): 271–280.Google Scholar
Babcock, Bruce A., and Blackmer, Alfred M. “The Value of Reducing Temporal Input Nonuniformities.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17(December 1992): 335–347.Google Scholar
Clark, David S. “Governmental Programs and Their Effect on the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Production Practices with Special Emphasis on Nitrogen Utilization.” M.S. thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, 1993.Google Scholar
Cramer, Craig. “USDA Axes Sustainable Ag Incentives.” The New Farm 13(May/June 1991): 2–3.Google Scholar
Diebel, Penelope L., and Williams, Jeffrey R. “An Economic Analysis of the Integrated Farm Management Option for Corn and Wheat Rotations.” Review of Agricultural Economics 15: 3(September 1993): 421–433.Google Scholar
Doering, Otto. “Federal Policies as Incentives or Disincentives to Ecologically Sustainable Agricultural Systems.” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2: 3 (1992): 21–36.Google Scholar
Faeth, Paul. “Evaluating Agricultural Policy and the Sustainability of Production systems: An Economic Framework.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (Mar-Apr 1993): 94–99.Google Scholar
Fan, Anna M., Willhite, Calvin C., and Book, Steven A. “Evaluation of the Nitrate Drinking Water Standard with Reference to Infant Methemoglobinemia and Potential Reproductive Toxicity.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 7 (1987): 135–148.Google Scholar
Follett, R.F., Kenney, D.R., and Cruse, R.M., eds. Managing Nitrogen for Groundwater Quality and Farm Profitability. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America, 1991.Google Scholar
Gardner, Bob, Schweikhardt, Dave, Hilker, Jim and Schwab, Gerry. “Explanation and Worksheet to Evaluate Participation Decisions in the 1993 U.S.D.A. Wheat and Feed Grain Programs.” Staff Paper 93–5, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, February 1993.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Jeffrey, Hatch, L. Upton, and Duffy, Patricia A. “Effect of the 1985 Farm Bill Provisions on Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 22(December 1990): 179–189.Google Scholar
Harwood, Richard. “Management of the ‘Living’ Soil for Human Well Being in an Increasingly Populous and Interdependent World.” Paper presented at the International Symposium on “World Agricultural Resources in the 21st Century: Environmental Quality, Natural Resources and Technologies.” Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, Morrilton, AR, May 5–6, 1993.Google Scholar
Helmers, Glenn A., Spilker, Matthew F., Azzam, Azzeddine, and Friesen, James E. “Target Price Incentives to Reduce Nitrogen Use in Agriculture—First Round Impacts.” Selected paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association annual meeting, Baltimore, MD, August 8–12, 1992.Google Scholar
Helmers, Glenn A., and Wehrman, Tobias J. “Fertilizer Reductions through Elimination of the ARP Program.” Selected paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association annual meeting, Orlando, FL, August 1–4, 1993.Google Scholar
Hinton, R.A. “Farm Management Manual.” Report AE-4473. Department of Agricultural Economics, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1984.Google Scholar
Huang, Wen-Yuan and Uri, Noel D. “An Assessment of Planting Flexibility Policy Options.” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2(4): (1992): 9–29.Google Scholar
Johnson, Scott L., Adams, Richard M., and Perry, Gregory M. “The On-Farm Costs of Reducing Groundwater Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (November 1991): 1063–1073.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Robert L., Maizel, Margaret Stewart, and Goss, Don W. Agricultural Chemical Use and Ground Water Quality: Where Are the Potential Problem Areas? National Center for Resource Innovations, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 1992.Google Scholar
Mims, Anne M., Duffy, Patricia A., and Young, George. “Effects of Alternative Acreage Restriction Provisions on Alabama Cotton Farms.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 21 (December 1989): 85–94.Google Scholar
Nott, S.B., Schwab, G.D., Shapley, A.E., Kelsey, M.P., Hilker, J.H., Copeland, L.O. “1992 Crops and Livestock Budgets Estimates for Michigan.” Agricultural Economics Report No. 556. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI, 1992.Google Scholar
Olson, Kent D., and Eidman, Vernon R. “A Farmer's Choice of Weed Control Method and the Impacts of Policy and Risk.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(January 1992): 125–137.Google Scholar
Poe, Gregory L., and Bishop, Richard C. “Measuring the Benefits of Groundwater Protection from Agricultural contamination: Results from a Two-Stage Contingent Valuation Study.” Staff Paper Series No. 341. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, May 1992.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S.E., Rotz, C.A., Black, J.R., and Muhtar, H. “Prediction of Suitable Days for Field Work.” Paper no. 82–1032 presented at the 1982 Summer Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 1982.Google Scholar
Scott, J.T. Jr., and Baker, C.B. “A Practical Way to Select an Optimum Farm Plan Under Risk.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54(November 1972): 657–660.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). National Water Summary 198. Water Supply Paper 2275, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC, 1985.Google Scholar
Taylor, Michael L., Adams, Richard M., and Miller, Stanley F. “Farm-Level Response to Agricultural Effluent Control Strategies: The Case of the Willamette Valley.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17(July 1992): 173–185.Google Scholar
Williams, Jeffery R., and Diebel, Penelope L. “Returns to Resource-Conserving Crop Rotations with and without Government Programs.” Staff Paper 93–10, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, June 1993.Google Scholar
Winter, C.K., Seiber, J.N. and Nuckton, C.F., eds. Chemicals in the Human Food Chain. New York: van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.Google Scholar