Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:31:29.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land, Economic Change, and Agricultural Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Emery N. Castle
Emery N. Castle*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyzes in three contexts the effects of changing economic conditions and varying economic perspectives on the way land is considered in economic doctrine. The first considers agricultural land use where agriculture is connected to the rest of the economy exclusively through input and commodity markets, and when all other parts of the economy are assumed to remain constant. The second connects agriculture to the remainder of the economy by virtue of a shared natural environment, facilitating a discussion of natural resource and environmental economics in relation to agricultural, institutional, and land economics. The third context permits economic change in the entire economy with particular attention given to population density, space, and distance. Private and public decision making are discussed with attention to federal, state, and local division of powers.

Keywords

applicability limitscentral place theorypublic and private decision makingrural economics
Type
Invited Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , April 2003 , pp. 18 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antweiler, W., and Trefler, D. (2002). “Increasing Returns and All That: A View from Trade.” American Economic Review 92(1), 93–119.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Eads, G. C., Hahn, R. W., Lave, L. B., Noll, R. G., Portney, P. R., Russel, M., Smalensee, R., Smith, V. K., and Stavins, R. N. (1996, April 12). “Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?” Science 272, pp. 221–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D. W. (1990). “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19(1), 86–107.Google Scholar
Bromley, D. W. (1997, October). “Constitutional Political Economy: Property Claims in a Dynamic World.” Contemporary Economic Policy 15(4), 43–54.Google Scholar
Bromley, D. W. (2000). “Property Regimes and Pricing Regimes in Water Resource Management.” In Dinar, A. (ed.), The Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms (chapter 2). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, D. L. (2002, March). “Migration and Community: Social Networks in a Multilevel World.” Rural Sociology 67(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budiansky, S. (1990). “The Ideology of Efficiency: Searching for a Theory of Policy Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19(1), 86–107.Google Scholar
Budiansky, S. (1997). “Rethinking Markets.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(5), 1383–1393.Google Scholar
Budiansky, S. (2002, January 24). “Diversionary Tactics in Environmental Debate” Nature 415, p. 364.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. J. (1982). Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. Boston: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Castle, Emery N. (1998). “Agricultural Industrialization in the American Countryside.” Policy Studies Report No. 11, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
Castle, Emery N. (2002, September). “Social Capital: An Interdisciplinary Concept.” Rural Sociology 67(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, E. N., and Berrens, R. P. (1993). “Endangered Species, Economic Analysis, and the Safe Minimum Standard.” Northwest Environmental Journal 9(1,2), 108–130.Google Scholar
Castle, E. N., Berrens, R. P., and Adams, R. M. (1994). “Natural Resource Damage Assessment: Speculations About a Missing Perspective.” Land Economics 70(30), 378–385.Google Scholar
Castle, E. N., Kelso, M., Stevens, J., and Stoevener, H. (1977). “Natural Resource Economics.” In Martin, L. (ed.), A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 3 (pp. 394–406). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
“Defending Science.” (2002, February 2). The Economist, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
De Marchi, N., ed. (1988). The Popperian Legacy in Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dinar, A., ed. (2000). Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P., eds. (1987). The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Volumes 3, 4. New York: The Stockton Press.Google Scholar
“Economics Focus: Never the Twain Shall Meet.” (2002, February 2). The Economist, pp. 74–76.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. (2002, May 2). “Emi's Fate, Our Fate” Nature 417, pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
Fitchen, J. (1991). Endangered Spaces, Enduring Places: Change, Identity, and Survival in Rural America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Garreau, J. (1998). “Edge Cities.” Landscape Architecture 78(8), 51–55.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heady, E. O. (1952). The Economics of Agricultural Production and Resource Use. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hite, J. C. (1997). “The Thunen Model and the New Economic Geography as a Paradigm for Rural Development Policy.” Review of Agricultural Economics 19(2), 230–240.Google Scholar
Hite, J. C. (1999). “Rural Development, the Thunen Paradigm, and the Death of Distance: Does Space Still Matter?” In Conceptual Foundation of Economics Research in Rural Studies: A Proceedings (pp. 11–21). National Rural Studies Committee, Western Rural Development Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Huntsberger, B., and Walth, B. (2002, March 4). “Salmon Pay for Shipping Benefits” The Oregonian, pp. 1, 6–7.Google Scholar
Isard, W. (1956). Location and Space Economy. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Just, R. J. (2001). “Addressing the Changing Nature of Uncertainty in Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(5), 1131–1153.Google Scholar
Katz, B., and Bradley, J. (1999, December). “Divided We Sprawl.” Atlantic Monthly, pp. 28–37.Google Scholar
Kilkenny, M. (1998a). “Transport Costs and Rural Development.” Journal of Regional Science 38(2), 293–312.Google Scholar
Kilkenny, M. (1998b). “Transport Costs, the New Economic Geography, and Rural Development.” Growth and Change 29(3), 259–280.Google Scholar
Kilkenny, M. (1999). “New Economic Geography for Low Density Places: Insights from Kaldor and Lancaster.” In Conceptual Foundations of Economic Research in Rural Studies: A Proceedings (pp. 23–31). National Rural Studies Committee, Western Rural Development Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1995). Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. (1995). “The Urban Invasion of Rural America: The Emergence of the Galactic City.” In Castle, E. N. (ed.), The Changing American Countryside: Rural People and Places (pp. 39–62). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Lind, R. C. (1999). “Analysis for Intergenerational Decision Making.” In Portney, P. R. and Weyant, J. P. (eds.), Discounting and Inter generational Equity (pp. 173–180). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. “The Litany and the Heretic.” (2002, February 2). The Economist, pp. 75-76.Google Scholar
Lomborg, B. (1998). The Skeptical Environmentalist. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lomborg, B. (2001, August 4). “The Truth About the Environment” The Economist, pp. 63–65.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, R. (2000). When Genius Failed: The Rise and Fall of Long-Term Capital Management. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. (1985). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (1999). “Discounting and Public Policies that Affect the Distant Future.” In Portney, P. R. and Weyant, J. P. (eds.), Discounting and Intergenerational Equity (pp. 145–162). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Page, T. (1988). “Intergenerational Equity and the Social Discount Rate.” In Smith, V. K. (ed.), Environmental Resources and the Social Discount Rate (pp. 71–89). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Pielke, R. (2002, March 28). “Science Policy: Policy, Politics, and Perspective” Nature 416, pp. 367–368 Google Scholar
Pimm, S., and Harvey, J. (2001, November 8). “No Need to Worry About the Future” Nature 414, pp. 149–150.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Portney, P. R., and Weyant, J. P., eds. (1999). Discounting and Intergenerational Equity. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1995). “Bowling Alone: The Strange Disappearance of Civic America.” Journal of Democracy 6, 65–78.Google Scholar
Rausser, G. C. (2000). “Collective Choice in Water Resource Systems.” In Dinar, A. (ed.), The Political Economy of Water Pricing Reforms (chapter 3). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. (1994). Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. W. (1951, December). “Declining Importance of Agricultural Land.” Economic Journal 61, 725–740.Google Scholar
Schultz, T. W. (1953). The Economic Organization of Agriculture. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. (1776, reprinted 1937). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Edited, with an introduction, notes, marginal summary, and an enlarged index by E. Cannan. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Sobel, J. (2002). “Can We Trust Social Capital?” Journal of Economic Literature 40(1), 139–154.Google Scholar
Trewavas, A. (2001, December 6). “Open Debate Is Essential on Conservation Issues” Nature 414, pp. 581–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vatn, A., and Bromley, D. (1994). “Choices Without Prices Without Apologies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26(2), 129–148.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O., Lovejoy, T. E., Myers, N., Harvey, J., and Pimm, S. (2001). “Biodiversity Distortions in Lomborg's The Skeptical Environmentalist.” Union of Concerned Scientists. Online at www.ucsusa.org/environment/wilson.pdf. [Accessed December 10, 2001.]Google Scholar
Woolcock, M. (1997). “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework.” Theory and Society 27(2), 151–208.Google Scholar
Wu, J.-J. (2002, May). “Environmental Amenities, Urban Sprawl, and the Economic Landscape.” Working paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Wu, J.-J., and Plantinga, A. J. (2002, May). “The Influence of Public Open Space on Urban Spatial Structure.” Working paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar