Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:32:07.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Management and the Farm Typology: Do Small Family Farms Manage Soil and Nutrient Resources Differently than Large Family Farms?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Meredith J. Soule
Meredith J. Soule*
Affiliation:
Resource Economics Division of the USDA's Economic Research Service
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that farmers face constraints on their farming decisions depending on the their resources, stage in life, and lifestyle choices. These factors are captured in a new farm typology developed by the Economic Research Service. The farm typology's definition of small and large farms is used to test the commonly stated hypothesis that small farmers practice better land husbandry than do large farmers. The adoption of eleven different soil and nutrient management practices used by U.S. corn producers is analyzed with a bivariate logit model for each practice. The farm typology is found to be significantly associated with two of the practices—rotation with legumes and conservation tillage.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , October 2001 , pp. 179 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belknap, J. and Saupe, W. 1988. “Farm Family Resources and the Adoption of No-Plow Tillage in Southwestern Wisconsin.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 10: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. 1995. Another Turn of the Crank. Washington, D.C.: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
Daberkow, S.G. and McBride, W.D. 1998. “Socioeconomic Profiles of Early Adopters of Precision Agriculture Technologies.” Journal of Agribusiness 16: 151–168.Google Scholar
Ervin, C.A. and Ervin, D.E. 1982. “Factors Affecting the Use of Soil Conservation Practices: Hypotheses, Evidence and Policy Implications.” Land Economics 58: 277–291.Google Scholar
Featherstone, A.M. and Goodwin, B.K. 1993. “Factors Influencing a Farmer's Decision to Invest in Long-Term Conservation Improvements.” Land Economics 69: 67–81.Google Scholar
Fuglie, K.O. and Bosch, D.J. 1995. “Economic and Environmental Implications of Soil Nitrogen Testing: A Switching Regression Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77: 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W. 1997. “Nutrient Management.” In Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Handbook No. 712: 204–224.Google Scholar
Judge, G.C., Hill, R.C., Griffiths, W.E., Lutkepohl, H. and Lee, T-C. 1988. Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kott, P.S. 1998. “Using the Delete-A-Group Jackknife Variance Estimator in NASS Surveys.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Research Report RD-98-01.Google Scholar
Lamb, J.L. and Keaveny, T.M. 1987. Eroding the Family Farm: Agricultural Policy and Stewardship of the Land. Dickinson, ND: Dakota Resource Council Education Project.Google Scholar
Lynne, G.D., Shonkwiler, J.S. and Rola, L.R. 1988. “Attitudes and Farmer Conservation Behavior.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 12–19.Google Scholar
Nolan, B.T., Ruddy, B.C., Hitt, K.J. and Helsel, D.R. 1998. “A National Look at Nitrate Contamination of Groundwater.” Water Conditioning & Purification, January.Google Scholar
Norris, P.E. and Batie, S.S. 1987. “Virginia Farmers’ Soil Conservation Decisions: An Application of Tobit Analysis.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 19: 79–90.Google Scholar
Rahm, M.R. and Huffman, W.E. 1984. “The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saliba, B.C. and Bromely, D.W. 1986. “Soil Management Decisions—How Should They Be Compared and What Variables Influence Them?” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 8: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandretto, C. 1997. “Crop Residue Management.” In Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Handbook No. 712, 155–174.Google Scholar
Sommer, J.E., Hoppe, R.A., Green, R.C. and Korb, P.J. 1998. Structural and Financial Characteristics of U.S. Farms, 1995: 20th Annual Family Farm Report to the Congress. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 746.Google Scholar
Soule, M.J., Tegene, A. and Wiebe, K.D. 2000. “Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 993–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. 1986. Small is Bountiful: The Importance of Small Farms in America. Washington, D.C.: American Farmland Trust.Google Scholar
Ullah, A. and Breunig, R.V. 1998. “Econometric Analysis in Complex Surveys.” In Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, Ullah, A. and Giles, D.E.A., Eds. 325–363. New York: Marcel Dekker.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 1999. Rural Conditions and Trends: Socioeconomic Conditions 9(2).Google Scholar
Wu, J. and Babcock, B.A. 1998. “The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economics and Environmental Implications.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 494–511.Google Scholar