Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:36:41.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Guiding Principles for Empirical Production Research in Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Richard E. Just
Richard E. Just*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at The University of Maryland
Get access

Abstract

Constraints on production economic research are examined in three dimensions: problem focus, methodology, and data availability. Data availability has played a large role in the choice of problem focus and explains some misdirected focus. A proprosal is made to address the data availability constraint. The greatest self-imposed constraints are methodological. Production economics has focused on flexible representations of technology at the expense of specificity in preferences. Yet some of the major problems faced by decision makers relate to long-term problems, e.g., the commodity boom and ensuing debt crisis of the 1970s and 1980s where standard short-term profit maximization models are unlikely to capture the essence of decision maker concerns.

Type
Invited Presentations
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 138 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J.M., and Chalfant, J.A. 1991. “Unstable Models from Incorrect Forms.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 1171–1181.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1996. “Nonparametric Tests of Stochastic Dominance in Income Distributions.” Econometrica 64: 1183–1193.Google Scholar
Antle, J.M. 1983. “Testing the Structure of Production: A Flexible Moment-Based Approach.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1: 192–201.Google Scholar
Antle, J. 1987. “Econometric Estimation of Producers’ Attitudes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69: 509–522.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J. 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bar-Shira, Z., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D. 1997. “Estimation of Farmers’ Risk Attitude: An Econometric Approach.” Agricultural Economics 17: 211–222.Google Scholar
Barry, P.J., and Robison, L.J. Forthcoming. “Agricultural Finance: Credit, Credit Constraints, and Consequences,” in Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Gardner, B.L. and Rausser, G.C., Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North-Holland.Google Scholar
Binswanger, H. 1980. “Attitudes Toward Risk: Experimental Measurement in Rural India.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62: 395–407.Google Scholar
Buschena, D., and Zilberman, D. 2000. “Generalized Expected Utility, Heteroscedastic Error, and Path Dependence in Risky Choice.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20: 67–88.Google Scholar
Candler, W., and Boehlje, M. 1971. “The Use of Linear Programming in Capital Budgeting with Multiple Goals.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 325–30.Google Scholar
Chambers, R.G., and Just, R.E. 1989. “Estimating Multi-output Technologies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(4): 980–995. November.Google Scholar
Chambers, R.G. and Quiggin, J. 1998. “Cost Functions and Duality for Stochastic Technologies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 288–295.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.P., and Cox, T.L. 1988. “A Nonparametric Analysis of Agricultural Technology.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 303–310.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.P., and Cox, T.L. 1994. “The Primal-Dual Nonparametric Productivity Analysis: The Case of U.S. Agriculture.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis 5: 359–73.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.-P., and Holt, M.T. 1996. “Economic Behavior Under Uncertainty: A Joint Analysis of Risk Preferences and Technology.” Review of Economics and Statistics 78: 329–35.Google Scholar
Chavas, J.-P., and Pope, R. 1985. “Price Uncertainty and Competitive Firm Behavior: Testable Hypotheses from Expected Utility Maximization.” Journal of Economics and Business 37(19): 223–35.Google Scholar
Cox, T.L., and Chavas, J.P. 1990. “A Nonparametric Analysis of Productivity: The Case of U.S. Agriculture.” European Review of Agricultural Economic 17: 449–64.Google Scholar
Coyle, B.T. 1992. “Risk Aversion and Price Risk in Duality Models of Production: A Linear Mean-Variance Approach,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74: 849–59.Google Scholar
Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dhrymes, P.J. 1973. “Restricted and Unrestricted Reduced Forms: Asymptotic Distribution and Relative Efficiency” Econometrica 41: 119–134.Google Scholar
Featherstone, A.M., Moghnieh, A.G., and Goodwin, B.K. 1995. “Farm Level Nonparametric Analysis of Cost Minimization and Profit Maximization Behavior.” Agricultural Economics 13: 109–17.Google Scholar
French, B.C., and Matthews, J.L. 1971. “A Supply Response Model for Perennial Crops,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 478–490.Google Scholar
Hazell, P.B.R. 1982. “Applications of Risk Preference Estimates in Firm-Household and Agricultural Sector Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64: 384–90.Google Scholar
Hazell, P.B.R. 1971. “A Linear Alternative to Quadratic and Semivariance Programming for Farm Planning Under Uncertainty.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 53–62.Google Scholar
Just, R.E. 1974. “An Investigation of the Importance of Risk in Farmers’ Decisions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56(1): 14–25. February.Google Scholar
Just, R.E. 1993. “Discovering Production and Supply Relationships: Present Status and Future Opportunities.” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 61(1): 11–40. April.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Antle, J.M. 1990. “Interactions Between Agricultural and Environmental Policies: A Conceptual Framework.” American Economic Review 80(2): 197–202. May.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., Calvin, L., and Quiggin, J. 1999. “Adverse Selection in Crop Insurance: Actuarial and Asymmetric Information Incentives.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(4): 834–849. November.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Candler, W. 1985. “Production Functions and Rationality of Mixed Cropping: The Nigerian Cas.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 12(3): 207–231.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Pope, R.D. 1979. “Production Function Estimation and Related Risk Consideration.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61 (2): 276–284. May.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Pope, R.D. 1999. “Implications of Heterogeneity for Theory and Practice in Production Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81 (2): 711–718. August.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Pope, R.D. Forthcoming. “The Agricultural Producer: Theory and Statistical Measurement.” in Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Gardner, B.L. and Rausser, G.C., Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North-Holland.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Rausser, G.C. 1983. “Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.” NCR-134 Conference. Des Moines, IA.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Weninger, Q. 1999. “Are Crop Yields Normally Distributed?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(2): 287–304. May.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., Zilberman, D., Hochman, E., and Bar-Shira, Z. 1990. “Input Allocation in Multicrop Systems.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1): 200–209. February.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–91.Google Scholar
Lau, L.J., and Yotopoulos, P.A. 1972. “Profit, Supply, and Factor Demand Functions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54(1): 11–18.Google Scholar
Machina, M.J. 1987. “Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 121–54.Google Scholar
McElroy, M. 1987. “Additive General Error Models for Production, Cost, and Derived Demand or Share Systems.” Journal of Political Economy 95: 737–57.Google Scholar
Moschini, G. 1999. “Production Risk and the Estimation of Ex-Ante Cost Functions.” Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Staff Paper #315. March.Google Scholar
Moschini, G., and Hennessy, D.A. Forthcoming. “Uncertainty, Risk Aversion, and Risk Management for Agricultural Producers.” in Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Gardner, B.L. and Rausser, G.C., Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North-Holland.Google Scholar
Mundlak, Y. 1996. “Production Function Estimation: Reviving the Primal.” Econometrica 64(2): 431–438.Google Scholar
Mundlak, Y. Forthcoming. “Production and Supply,” in Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Gardner, B.L. and Rausser, G.C., Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North-Holland.Google Scholar
Nerlove, M., and Bessler, D.A. “Expectations, Information and Dynamics,” in Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Gardner, B.L. and Rausser, G.C., Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North-Holland.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, C.J., and Woodland, A.D. 1995. “Estimation of Australian Wool and Lamb Production Technologies under Uncertainty: An Error Components Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77: 552–565.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. 1993. Generalized Expected Utility Theory—The Rank-dependent Model. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pflueger, B.W., and Barry, P.J. 1986. “Crop Insurance and Credit: A Farm Level Simulation Analysis.” Agricultural Finance Review 46: 1–14.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D. 1980. “The Generalized Envelope Theorem and Price Uncertainty.” International Economic Review 21(1): 75–86.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D. 1988. “A New Parametric Test for the Structure of Risk Preferences.” Economics Letters 27: 117–121.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D., and Just, R.E. 1991. “On Testing the Structure of Risk Preferences in Agricultural Supply Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 7(3): 743–748. August.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D., and Just, R.E. 1996. “Empirical Implementation of Ex-ante Cost Functions.” Journal of Econometrics 72: 231–249.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D., and Just, R.E. 1998. “Cost Functional Estimation Under Risk Aversion.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(2): 296–302. May.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D., and Just, R.E. 1999. “Distinguishing Errors in Measurement from Errors in Optimization.” Working Paper, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D., and Just, R.E. 2000. “Random Profits and Duality.” Working Paper, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Saha, A., Shumway, C.R., and Talpaz, H. 1994. “Joint Estimation of Risk Preference Structure and Technology Using Expo-Power Utility.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 173–84.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1967. Foundations of Economic Analysis. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Smale, M., Just, R.E., and Leathers, H.D. 1994. “Land Allocation in HYV Adoption Models: An Investigation of Alternative Explanations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(3): 535–546. August.Google Scholar
Tauer, L.W. 1995. “Do New York Farmers Maximize Profits or Minimize Costs?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77: 421–29.Google Scholar
Tolley, H.D., and Pope, R.D. 1988. “Testing for Stochastic Dominance,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70: 693–700.Google Scholar
Wolf, S., Just, D.R., Zilberman, D. Forthcoming. “Between Data and Decisions: The Organization of Agricultural Economic Information Systems.” Research Policy.Google Scholar
Yotopoulos, P.A., Lau, L.J., and Lin, W.L. 1976. “Microeconomic Output Supply and Factor Demand Functions in the Agriculture of the Province of Taiwan.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(2): 333–340.Google Scholar
Young, D.L. 1979. “Risk Preferences of Agricultural Producers: Their Use in Extension and Research.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61: 1067–1070.Google Scholar