Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:38:33.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Contracting and the Scale of Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Nigel Key
Nigel Key*
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study presents evidence that contracting is positively associated with the scale of production for six major U.S. agricultural commodities. Specifically, contract producers tend to operate at a larger scale than do independent producers, and the likelihood of an operation contracting increases with its scale. This relationship is strongest in the cattle and hog sectors, where it persists even among large commercial operations. Six theoretical explanations for the observed correlation between scale and contracting are proposed, including imperfect capital markets, contractor transaction costs, input leverage, grower risk aversion, asset specificity, and technological change. Information from five annual national surveys is used to examine the validity of three of the proposed mechanisms.

Keywords

marketing contractsproduction contractsriskscale of productiontransaction costs
Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , October 2004 , pp. 255 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D. W., and Lueck, D. (2003). The Nature of the Farm: Contracts, Risk, and Organization in Agriculture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, P., Roberts, B., Boehlje, M., and Baker, T. (1997, Summer). “Financing Capabilities of Independent versus Contract Hog Production.” Journal of Agricultural Lending, pp. 8–14.Google Scholar
Boehlje, M., and Ray, J. (1999). “Contract vs. Independent Pork Production: Does Financing Matter?” Agricultural Finance Review 59, 31–42.Google Scholar
Foss, N., Lando, H., and Thomsen, S. (2000). “The Theory of the Firm.” In Bouckaert, B. and De Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume I: The History and Methodology of Law and Economics (pp. 631–658). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hart, O., and Moore, J. (1988). “Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation.” Econometrica 56, 755–785.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. A., and MacDonald, J. M. (2001, May). “America's Diverse Family Farms: Assorted Sizes, Types, and Situations.” Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 769, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hubbard, G. R. (1998, March). “Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment.” Journal of Economic Literature 36, 193–225.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. S., and Foster, K. (1994, December). “Risk Preferences and Contracting in the U.S. Hog Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26(2), 393–405.Google Scholar
Key, N., and McBride, W. (2003, February). “Production Contracts and Productivity in the U.S. Hog Sector.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(1), 121–133.Google Scholar
Key, N., and Runsten, D. (1999, February). “Contract Farming, Smallholders, and Rural Development in Latin America: The Organization of Agroprocessing Firms and the Scale of Outgrower Production.” World Development 27(2), 381–401.Google Scholar
Klein, B., Crawford, R., and Alchian, A. (1978). “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process.” Journal of Law and Economics 21(2), 297–326.Google Scholar
Knoeber, C., and Thurman, W. (1995, August). “‘Don't Count Your Chickens …’: Risk and Risk Shifting in the Broiler Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, 486–496.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. D., and Grimes, G. (2001). “Production and Marketing Characteristics of U.S. Pork Producers, 2000.” Staff Paper No. 343, Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames.Google Scholar
Martin, L. A. (1997, December). “Production Contracts, Risk Shifting, and Relative Performance Contracts in the Pork Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29, 267–278.Google Scholar
McBride, W., and Key, N. (2003, February). “Economic and Structural Relationships in U.S. Hog Production.” Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 818, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, M., and Williamson, O. E. (1985, December). “Asset Specificity and Economic Organization.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 3(4), 365–378.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1971). “On the Theory of the Competitive Firm Under Price Uncertainty.” American Economic Review 61, 65–73.Google Scholar
Shelanski, H. A., and Klein, P. G. (1995). “Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and Assessment.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11, 335–361.Google Scholar
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J., and Weiss, A. (1981, June). “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information.” American Economic Review 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. “Agricultural Resource Management Survey” (ARMS). Various years, 1996-2000. Annual farm survey, jointly conducted by Economic Research Service and National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. (1995-1999). Hogs and Pigs. Various December issues. USDA/NASS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. (1992 and 1997). Census of Agriculture. Volume 1: National, State, and County Tables, Table 45. USDA/NASS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. (1999). Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1979). “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations.” Journal of Law and Economics 22(2), 233–261.Google Scholar