Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:51:00.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commercial Agriculture in Metropolitan Areas: Economics and Regulatory Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Bruce L. Gardner*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Abstract

Metropolitan agriculture is economically important, especially in the Northeast. While faced with substantial economic and regulatory obstacles, commercial farming in urban areas is surviving and even prospering. In terms of standard models of agriculture in economic development, this is a puzzle. But more detailed, spatial economic models indicate how labor-intensive production of perishable commodities in urbanized areas can make economic sense, especially when coupled with environmental amenities that farming generates for nonfarm people. At the same time, environmental disamenities of agriculture are larger in densely populated areas. The political economy outcomes have tended to be favorable to continued farming, albeit with increased regulation. Nonetheless, many questions remain about the dynamics of agricultural adjustment to urbanization, and the possible steady-state mix of farm and nonfarm activities.

Type
Invited Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, J. David. “State Farmland Preferential Assessment Statutes,” Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, RB310, Sept. 1989.Google Scholar
Andrews, Margaret S., and Lopez, Rigoberto A.Agricultural Disinvestment in Urbanizing Areas,” In Heimlich, Ralph E., ed., Land Use Transition in Urbanizing Areas, Washington, D.C.: The Farm Foundation, 1989, pp. 5366.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary. “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (1983): 371400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald A.The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics 3(October 1960): 144.Google Scholar
Dillman, Buddy L.A Framework for Evaluating Land Retention Programs,” in Heimlich (1989), pp. 127137.Google Scholar
Dunford, R.W.Further Evidence on the Conversion of U.S. Farmland to Urban or Transportation Uses,” Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C., 1983.Google Scholar
Gardner, Bruce L.Redistribution of Income through Commodity and Resource Policies,” In Just, R.E. and Bockstael, N., eds., Commodity and Resource Policies in Agricultural Systems, New York: Springer Verlag, 1991, pp. 129142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischel, W.A.The Urbanization of Agricultural Land: A Review of the National Agricultural Lands Study,” Land Economics 58: 2 (1982): 236259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischel, W.A.Discussion: Why Not Disown NALS?” in Heimlich (1989), pp. 199205.Google Scholar
Hand, Jacqueline P.Right-to-Farm Laws,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 45 (1984): 289350.Google Scholar
Heimlich, Ralph E., ed. Land Use Transition in Urbanizing Areas, Washington, D.C.: The Farm Foundation/Economic Research Service, 1989.Google Scholar
Heimlich, Ralph E., and Barnard, Charles H.Agricultural Adaptation to Urbanization,” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (April 1992): 5060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimlich, Ralph E., and Barnard, Charles H.Agricultural Adaptation to Urbanization,” presented at Western Regional Science Association Meeting, Monterey, CA, Feb. 1991.Google Scholar
Heimlich, Ralph E., Vesterby, Marlow, and Krupa, Kenneth S.Urbanizing Farmland: Dynamics of Land Use Change in Fast-Growth Counties,” USDA-ERS, Agr. Info. Bul. No. 629, August 1991.Google Scholar
Heimstra, Hal. “A Policy Forum,” in Heimlich (1989), pp. 115125.Google Scholar
Katzman, Martin T.The von Thuenen Paradigm, the Industrial-Urban Hypothesis, and the Spatial Structure of Agriculture,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56(Nov. 1974): 683696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisansky, Judith. “Farming in an Urbanized Environment,” Human Organization 45(Winter 1986): 363371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Margaret S., and Lopez, Rigoberto A.The Determinants of Right-to-Farm Conflicts,” Rural Sociology 53(Summer 1988): 246255.Google Scholar
Lockeretz, William. “Trends in Farming Near Cities,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41 (1986): 256262.Google Scholar
Lopez, Rigoberto A., Adelaja, Adesoji O., and Andrews, Margaret S.The Effects of Suburbanization on Agriculture,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(May 1988): 346358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Farhed A., and Altobello, Marilyn A.Amenity Benefits and the Optimal Allocation of Land,” Land Economics 69(February 1994), forthcoming.Google Scholar
McConnell, Kenneth E.Optimal Quantity of Land in Agriculture,” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18(October 1989): 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muth, Richard F.Economic Change and Rural-Urban Land Conversions,” Econometrica 29(Jan. 1961): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Agricultural Lands Study, Final Report, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1981.Google Scholar
Nicholls, William H.Industrialization, Factor Markets, and Agricultural Development,” Journal of Political Economy 69(August 1961): 319340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, C. Tim, and Heimlich, Ralph E.The Conservation Reserve Program: Status, Future, and Policy Options,” USDA-ERS, March 1993.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Law and Economics 19(August 1976): 211240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttan, Vernon W.The Impact of Urban-Industrial Development on Agriculture in the Tennessee Valley and the Southeast,” Journal of Farm Economics 37(Feb. 1955): 3856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Theodore W. The Economic Organization of Agriculture. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1953.Google Scholar
Tang, Anthony M. Economic Development in the Southern Piedmont, 1860–1950, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1958.Google Scholar