Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:12:06.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Incentives for Controlling Trade-Related Biological Invasions in the Great Lakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Richard D. Horan  and
Frank Lupi
Richard D. Horan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan
Frank Lupi
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan
Get access

Abstract

Ballast water from commercial ships engaged in international trade has been implicated as the primary invasion pathway in over 60 percent of new introductions of invasive alien species (IAS) in the Great Lakes since 1960. Recent policies have recognized that IAS are a form of biological pollution and have become focused on preventing new introductions. Given that emissions-based incentives are infeasible for the case of biological emissions, we investigate the cost-effectiveness of various performance proxy-based and technology-based economic incentives to reduce the threat of new invasions of Ponto-Caspian species in the Great Lakes.

Keywords

aquatic nuisance speciesballast wateruncertaintyrisk managementperformance-based incentivesenvironmental subsidies
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , April 2005 , pp. 75 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aseinova, A.A. 2003. “Clupeonella cultriventris caspia.” Caspian Sea Biodiversity Database, Caspian Environment Programme, Baku, Azerbaijan. Available at http://www.caspianenvironment.org/biodb/eng/main.htm (accessed March 31, 2003).Google Scholar
Baumol, W.J., and Oates, W.E. 1988. The Theory of Environmental Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baychorov, V.M. 1980. “Reproduction of the Mysid paramysis lacustris (crustacea) in the Northern and Southern Zones of Its Introduction.” Hydrobiological Journal 15(6): 29–34.Google Scholar
Beavis, B., and Walker, M. 1983. “Achieving Environmental Standards with Stochastic Discharges.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10(2): 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coscarelli, M., and Bankard, E. 1999. Aquatic Nuisance Species Handbook for Government Officials. Office of the Great Lakes, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
Farley, R.B. 1996. “Analysis of Overseas Vessel Transits into the Great Lakes through Commercial Shipping Ballast Water and Assessment of Control Options, Phase I and Phase II.” Unpublished paper, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (October).Google Scholar
Great Lakes Commission. 2000. Ballast Management for the Prevention and Control of Aquatic Nuisance Species. Great Lakes Commission, Ann Arbor, MI. Great Lakes Commission Resolutions available online at http://www.glc.org/about/resolutions/ballast.html (accessed May 25, 2000).Google Scholar
Helfand, G.E., and House, B.W. 1995. “Regulating Nonpoint Source Pollution under Heterogeneous Conditions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(4): 1024–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. 1998. “Day of the Sparrow.” New Scientist (June 27): 32–35.Google Scholar
Horan, R.D. 2001. “Differences in Social and Public Risk Perceptions and Conflicting Impacts on Point/Nonpoint Trading Ratios.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(4): 934–941.Google Scholar
Horan, R.D., and Lupi, F. 2003. “The Economics of Policy Options for Controlling the Introduction and Spread of Aquatic Nuisance Species in the Great Lakes. Interim report, Project No. R/EP-9, submitted to Michigan Sea Grant, April 11.Google Scholar
Horan, R.D., and Lupi, F. 2005. “Tradeable Risk Permits to Prevent Future Introductions of Invasive Alien Species in the Great Lakes.” Ecological Economics 52(3): 289–304.Google Scholar
Horan, R.D., Perrings, C., Lupi, F., and Bulte, E. 2002. “Biological Pollution Prevention Strategies Under Ignorance: The Case of Invasive Species.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(5): 1303–1310.Google Scholar
Just, R., and Antle, J. 1990. “Interactions between Agricultural and Environmental Policies.” American Economic Review 80(2): 197–202.Google Scholar
Karaminas, L., Ocakli, H.H., Mazdon, K.C., and Westlake, P.C. 2000. “Ballast Water Management.” LR Technical Association Paper No. 1, Session 2000-2001, Lloyd's Register of Shipping, London.Google Scholar
Kolar, C.S., and Lodge, D.M. 2002. “Ecological Predictions and Risk Assessments for Alien Species.” Science 298(5596): 1233–1236.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, E., and Zilberman, D. 1988. “Efficient Regulation of Environmental Health Risks.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(1): 167–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, E., Zilberman, D., and Bogen, K. 1989. “Regulating Environmental Health Risks Under Uncertainty: Groundwater Contamination in California.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17(1): 22–34.Google Scholar
Lupi, F., Hoehn, J., and Christie, G. 2003. “Using an Economic Model of Recreational Fishing to Evaluate Benefits of Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) Control.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 29(S1): 742–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MDEQ [see Michigan Department of Environmental Quality].Google Scholar
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. 1996. Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Species State Management Plan: A Strategy to Confront Their Spread in Michigan. Available online at http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,1607,7-135-3313_3677_8314-16514-,00.html (accessed October 25, 2001).Google Scholar
Mills, E.L., Leach, J.H., Carlton, J.T., and Secor, C.L. 1993. “Exotic Species in the Great Lakes: A History of Biotic Crises and Anthropogenic Introductions.” Journal of Great Lakes Research 19(1): 1–54.Google Scholar
National Research Council Committee on Ships’ Ballast Operations. 1996. Stemming the Tide: Controlling Introductions of Nonindigenous Species by Ships‘ Ballast Water. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
NRC [see National Research Council Committee on Ships’ Ballast Operations].Google Scholar
Perakis, A.N., and Yang, Z. 2001. “An Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Proposed Non-Indigenous Species Legislation for the St. Lawrence Seaway Using Multi-Attribute Decision Theory.” Interim Report to the Michigan Sea Grant Program (May).Google Scholar
Perrings, C., Williamson, M., Barbier, E.B., Delfino, D., Dalmazzone, S., Shogren, J., Simmons, P., and Watkinson, A. 2002. “Biological Invasion Risks and the Public Good: An Economic Perspective.” Conservation Ecology 6(1) (available online at http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art1).Google Scholar
Perrings, C., Williamson, M., and Dalmazzone, S. (eds.). 2000. The Economics of Biological Invasions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pezzack, D.S., and Corey, S. 1979. “The Life History and Distribution of Neomysis Americana (Smith) (Crustacea, Mysidacea) in Passamaquoddy Bay.” Canadian Journal of Zoology 57(4): 785–793.Google Scholar
Pollutech [see Pollutech Environmental Limited].Google Scholar
Pollutech Environmental Limited. 1996. “A Review and Evaluation of Ballast Water Management and Treatment Options to Reduce the Potential for the Introduction of Non-Native Species to the Great Lakes.” Report to the Canadian Coast Guard (Sarnia, ON).Google Scholar
Rajagopal, S., van der Velde, G., Paffen, B.G.P., van den Brink, F.W.B., and Bij de Vaate, A. 1999. “Life History and Reproductive Biology of the Invasive Amphipod Corophium Curvispinum (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in the Lower Rhine.” Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 144(3): 305–325.Google Scholar
Reeves, E. 1999. “Exotic Policy: An IJC White Paper on Policies for the Prevention of the Invasion of the Great Lakes by Exotic Organisms.” Great Lakes Water Quality Forum, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
Reid, D.F., and Orlova, M.I. 2002. “Geological and Evolutionary Underpinnings for the Success of Ponto-Caspian Species Invasions in the Baltic Sea and North American Great Lakes.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59(7): 1144–1158.Google Scholar
Ricciardi, A., and Rasmussen, J.B. 1998. “Predicting the Identity and Impact of Future Biological Invaders: A Priority for Aquatic Resource Management.” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55(7): 1759–1765.Google Scholar
Rigby, G., and Taylor, A.H. 2001. “Ballast Water Treatment to Minimize the Risks of Introducing Nonindigenous Marine Organisms into Australian Ports.” Ballast Water Report Series No. 13, Australian Government Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra.Google Scholar
Russell, C.S., and Powell, P.T. 2000. “Practical Considerations and Comparison of Instruments.” In van den Berg, J., ed., Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shackle, G.L.S. 1969. Decision, Order and Time in Human Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shortle, J.S., and Abler, D.G. 1997. “Nonpoint Pollution.” In Folmer, H. and Tietenberg, T., eds., The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1997/98. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shortle, J.S., and Dunn, J.W. 1986. “The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(3): 668–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2002. NDC Publications and U.S. Waterway Data CD (Vol. 8). Institute for Water Resources, Navigation Data Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2001. “Aquatic Nuisance Species in Ballast Water Discharges: Issues and Options.” Draft report for public comment, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds, Office of Wastewater Management, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar