Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:02:43.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of the Free Trade Area of the Americas on Forest Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

James A. Turner ,
Joseph Buongiorno  and
Shushuai Zhu
James A. Turner
Affiliation:
New Zealand Forest Research Institute in Rotorua, New Zealand
Joseph Buongiorno
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Ecology and Management at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
Shushuai Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Ecology and Management at the University of Wisconsin-Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) agreement on the forest sectors and resources of member countries are investigated. A model of wood supply within the spatial partial-equilibrium Global Forest Products Model is developed to link international trade and deforestation. The direct effects of tariff changes and the indirect effects of income changes induced by trade liberalization are considered. The FTAA has a small positive impact on the region's forest resources. Higher harvests of industrial roundwood in most countries are offset by increased afforestation due to the income effect of trade liberalization (captured by the environmental Kuznets curve).

Keywords

trade liberalizationinternational tradeforest resourcesforest sector trade model
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , April 2005 , pp. 104 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, D.M., and Haynes, R.W. 1989. “A Model of National Forest Timber Supply and Stumpage Markets in the Western United States.” Forest Science 35(2): 401–424.Google Scholar
Adams, D.M., and Haynes, R.W. 1996. “The 1993 Timber Assessment Market Model: Structure, Projections, and Policy Simulations.” General Technical Report GTR-PNW-368, USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, D.M., Ince, P., Alig, R., Butler, B., Mills, J., Brooks, D., Haynes, R., and Zhou, X. 2003. “Assumptions and Methods Used in Projections.” In Haynes, R., Coordinator, Technical, An Analysis of the Timber Situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Amacher, G.S., Hyde, W.F., and Kanel, K.R. 1996. “Household Fuelwood Demand and Supply in Nepal's Tarai and Mid-Hills: Choice between Cash Outlays and Labor Opportunity.” World Development 24(11): 1725–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Lands Alliance. 2001. Impact of the Free Trade Area of the Americas on Forests: A Forest Specific Analysis of the Draft Text of the FTAA. American Lands Alliance, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., and Taylor, M.S. 2001. “Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?” The American Economic Review 91(4): 877–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binkley, C.S. 1987. “Economic Models of Timber Supply.” In Kallio, M., Dykstra, D.P., and Binkley, C.S., eds., The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Binkley, C.S., and Dykstra, D.P. 1987. “Timber Supply.” In Kallio, M., Dykstra, D.P., and Binkley, C.S., eds., The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brander, J.A., and Taylor, M.S. 1997. “International Trade between Consumer and Conservationist Countries.” Resource and Energy Economics 19(1): 267–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, J.A., and Taylor, M.S. 1998. “Open Access Renewable Resources: Trade and Trade Policy in a Two-Country Model.” Journal of International Economics 44(1): 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, D.J. 1987. “Modeling Forest Dynamics.” In Kallio, M., Dykstra, D.P., and Binkley, C.S., eds., The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brown, C. 2000. “The Global Outlook for Future Wood Supply from Forest Plantations.” Global Forest Products Outlook Study Working Paper No. GFPOS/WP/03, Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Buongiorno, J., Zhu, S., Zhang, D., Turner, J.A., and Tomberlin, J. 2003. The Global Forest Products Model: Structure, Estimation and Applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burfisher, M., and Link, J. 2000. “Free Trade Area of the Americas: What Are the Benefits for U.S. Agriculture?” Agricultural Outlook (April), Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Chomitz, K.M., Griffiths, C., and Puri, J. 1999. “Fuel Prices, Woodlands, and Woodfuel Markets in the Sahel: An Integrated Economic-Ecological Model.” In Fredriksson, P.G., ed., Trade, Global Policy, and the Environment. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 402, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Diao, X., Diaz-Bonilla, E., and Robinson, S. 2003. “Scenarios for Trade Integration in the Americas.” Économie Internationale 94–95(1): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diao, X., Somwaru, A., and Raney, T. 1998. “A Dynamic Evaluation of the Effects of Western Hemisphere Integration on the U.S. Economy.” In Burfisher, M.E. and Jones, E.A., eds., Regional Trade Agreements and U.S. Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 771, Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA.Google Scholar
FAO [see Food and Agriculture Organization].Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2001a. “Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000: Main Report.” FAO Forestry Paper No. 140, Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2001b. FAOStat: FAO Statistical Databases (Vol. 2001). Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. Forthcoming. “Past Trends and Future Prospects for the Utilization of Wood for Energy.” Global Forest Products Outlook Study Working Paper No. GFPOS/WP/05, Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Fredriksson, P.G. 1998. “Trade, Global Policy, and the Environment: New Evidence and Background Issues.” In Fredriksson, P.G., ed., Trade, Global Policy, and the Environment. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 402, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenaway, D., Morgan, W., and Wright, R. 2002. “Trade Liberalization and Growth in Developing Countries.” Journal of Development Economics 67(1): 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.M., and Kreuger, A.B. 1995. “Economic Growth and the Environment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2): 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanel, K.R., Amacher, G.S., Hyde, W.F., and Ersado, L. 2000. “Regional Fuelwood Production and Consumption in Nepal: With Implications for Local Adoption of New Forestry Practices.” In Hyde, W.F. and Amacher, G.S., eds., Economics of Forestry and Rural Development: An Empirical Introduction from Asia. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mattson, J.W., and Koo, W.W. 2003. “US Agricultural Trade with Latin American Countries and Effects of the Free Trade Area of the Americas on Specific Commodities.” Agribusiness and Applied Economics Report No. 510, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, H., and Vaughan, S. 1999. Special Studies 2: Trade and Environment. Geneva: World Trade Organization Publications.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T.A. 2002. Latin American Trade Agreements. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Oliver, C.D., and Larson, B.C. 1996. Forest Stand Dynamics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Prestemon, J.P., and Buongiorno, J. 1996. “The Impacts of NAFTA on U.S. and Canadian Forest Product Exports to Mexico.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26(5): 784–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. 1952. “Spatial Price Equilibrium and Linear Programming.” The American Economic Review 42(1): 283–303.Google Scholar
Schott, J.J., and Hufbauer, G.C. 1999. “Whither the Free Trade Area of the Americas?” World Economy 22(6): 765–782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedjo, R.A., and Lyon, K.S. 1983. “Long-term Forest Resources Trade, Global Timber Supply, and Intertemporal Comparative Advantage.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(5): 1010–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedjo, R.A., and Lyon, K.S. 1990. The Long Term Adequacy of World Timber Supply. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Smith, D.M., Larson, B.C., Kelty, M.J., and Ashton, P.M.S. 1996. The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology (9th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Stout, J.V., and Ugaz-Pereda, J. 1998. “Western Hemisphere Trading Blocs and Tariff Barriers for U.S. Agricultural Exports.” In Burfisher, M.E. and Jones, E.A., eds., Regional Trade Agreements and U.S. Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 771, Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA.Google Scholar
Takayama, T., and Judge, G.G. 1971. Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
Tomberlin, D.A. 1999. “Timber Supply, Trade, and Environment in the Pacific Rim Forest Sector.” Doctoral dissertation, Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Turner, J.A. 2004. “Trade Liberalization and Forest Resources: A Global Modeling Approach.” Doctoral dissertation, Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Turner, J.A., Buongiorno, J., Horgan, G.P., and Maples-den, F.M. 2001. “Liberalisation of Forest Product Trade and the New Zealand Forest Sector, 2000-2015: A Global Modelling Approach.” New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 31(3): 320–338.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2000. “Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand.” Geneva Timber and Forest Study Papers No. 17, United Nations, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1998. “Free Trade in the Americas.” WRS-98-1, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. 1999. “Conditions of Competition on U.S. Forest Products: Report on Investigation No. 332-400 Under Section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.” Publication 3246, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Vincent, J.R. 1992. “The Tropical Timber Trade and Sustainable Development.” Science 256(5064): 1651–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wear, D.N., and Flamm, R. 1993. “Public and Private Forest Disturbance Regimes in the Southern Appalachians.” Natural Resource Modeling 7(4): 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A., and Martin, A. 2002. Who Owns the World's Forest? Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition. Forest Trends, and Center for International Environmental Law, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
Zhu, S., and Buongiorno, J. 2002. “International Impact of National Environmental Policies: The Case of Paper Recycling in the United States.” International Forestry Review 4(2): 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, S., Buongiorno, J., and Brooks, D. 2001. “Effects of Accelerated Tariff Liberalization on the Forest Products Sector: A Global Modeling Approach.” Forest Policy and Economics 2(1): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar