Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:10:55.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Environmental and Health Motivations on the Organic Share of Produce Purchases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Catherine A. Durham
Catherine A. Durham*
Affiliation:
Food Innovation Center Experiment Station in Portland, Oregon and Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon
Get access

Abstract

As demand and supply of organic produce has increased, it has become possible to distinguish between the many individuals that express a preference for organic and the share of their purchases that is organically produced. This study examines the share of a consumer's produce purchases that are organic, and how that is influenced by economic factors, environmental and health motivations, and demographic characteristics. Results from a model of organic preference are compared to those from a model of organic buying proportions. Buying proportion models are also estimated separately for those that preferred organic and those that preferred conventional produce. A limitation in this study is that it evaluates stated buying proportions rather than actual purchases.

Keywords

organic produce sharehealthenvironment
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , October 2007 , pp. 304 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, M. 2002. “Elements of an Organic Lifestyle: How an Organic Lifestyle Evolves over Time.” N/sight IV(2): 3–7.Google Scholar
Boccaletti, S., and Michele, N. 2000. “Consumer Willingness to Pay for Pesticide-Free Fresh Fruit and Vegetables in Italy.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3(3): 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzby, J.C., and Skees, J. 1994. “Consumers Want Reduced Exposure to Pesticides in Food.” Food Review 17(2): 19–22.Google Scholar
Byrne, P., Bacon, R., and Toensmeyer, U. 1994. “Pesticide Residue Concerns and Shopping Location Likelihood.” Agribusiness 10(6): 491–501.Google Scholar
Byrne, P., Gempesaw, C., and Toensmeyer, U. 1991. “An Evaluation of Consumer Pesticide Residue Concerns and Risk Perceptions.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 23(2): 167–174.Google Scholar
Cosslett, S.R. 1981. “Efficient Estimation of Discrete-Choice Models.” In Manski, C.F. and McFadden, D., eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, R., and MacKinnon, J.G. 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, A., Titterington, A.J., and Cochrane, C. 1995. “Who Buys Organic Food? A Profile of the Purchasers of Organic Food in Northern Ireland.” British Food Journal 97(10): 17–23.Google Scholar
Dimitri, C., and Greene, C. 2002. “Recent Growth Patterns in the U.S. Organic Foods Market.” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Eom, Y.S. 1994. “Pesticide Residue Risk and Food Safety Valuation: A Random Utility Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(4): 760–771.Google Scholar
Food Marketing Institute. 2001. “Spending on Organic Foods Rises as American Consumers Seek to Balance Health and Nutrition Needs, According to FMI Study.” Food Marketing Institute News. Available at www.fmi.org/media/media[-]text.cfm?id=362.Google Scholar
Gifford, K., and Bernard, J.C. 2004. “The Impact of Message Framing on Organic Food Purchase Likelihood.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 35(3): 19–28.Google Scholar
Gil, J.M., Gracia, A., and Sanchez, M. 2000. “Market Segmentation and Willingness to Pay for Organic Products in Spain.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 3(2): 207–226.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., and Italia, J. 1999. “Predicting Willingness to Pay a Premium for Organically Grown Fresh Produce.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 30(2): 44–53.Google Scholar
Govindasamy, R., Italia, J., and Adelaja, A. 2001. “Predicting Willingness-to-Pay a Premium for Integrated Pest Management Produce: A Logistic Approach.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 30(2): 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2002. Limdep (Version 8.0). Econometric Software Incorporated, Bellport, NY.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hartman, H., and Wright, D. 1999. “The Organic Consumer Profile.” Hartman Group, Bellevue, WA.Google Scholar
Hollis, G. 2001. “The Great Organic Con Trick.” The Times (London), Features, Viewpoint, p. 5 (July 4, 2001).Google Scholar
Hosmer, D.W., and Lemeshow, S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar
Huang, C.L. 1996. “Consumer Preferences and Attitudes Towards Organically Grown Produce.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 23(3): 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, R.J., Wessells, C.R., Donath, H., and Asche, F. 2001. “A Contingent Choice Analysis of Ecolabeled Seafood: Comparing Consumer Preferences in the United States and Norway.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(1): 20–39.Google Scholar
Jolly, D.A. 1991. “Determinants of Organic Horticultural Products Consumption Based on a Sample of California Consumers.” Acta Horticulturae 295(May): 141–148.Google Scholar
Kieschnick, R., and McCullough, B.D. 2003. “Regression Analysis of Variates Observed on (0, 1): Percentages, Proportions and Fractions.” Statistical Modelling: An International Journal 3(3): 193–213.Google Scholar
Kraft, F.B., and Goodell, P.W. 1993. “Identifying the Health Conscious Consumer.” Journal of Health Care Marketing 13(3): 18–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Loureiro, M.L., and Hine, S. 2002. “Discovering Niche Markets: A Comparison of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local (Colorado Grown), Organic, and GMO-Free Products.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34(3): 477–487.Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., McCluskey, J.J., and Mittelhammer, R.C. 2001. “Assessing Consumer Preferences for Organic, EcoLabeled, and Regular Apples.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(2): 404–416.Google Scholar
Manski, C.F., and McFadden, D. 1981. “Alternative Estimators and Sample Designs for Discrete Choice Analysis.” In Manski, C.F. and McFadden, D., eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCluskey, J.J., Grimsrud, K.M., Ouchi, H., and Wahl, T.I. 2003. “Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Food Products in Japan.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(2): 222–231.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, A.D.R., and Tsai, C.-L. 1998. Regression and Time Series Model Selection. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, S.K., Huang, C.L., and Ott, S.L. 1991. “Consumer Willingness to Pay for Pesticide-Free Fresh Produce.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16(2): 218–227.Google Scholar
Moore, D. 2002. “The Organic Consumer May Not Be Who You Think It Is.” N/sight 4(2): 18–22.Google Scholar
Ott, S.L. 1990. “Supermarket Shoppers' Pesticide Concerns and Willingness to Purchase Certified Pesticide Residue-Free Fresh Produce.” Agribusiness 6(6): 593–602.Google Scholar
Papke, L.E., and Wooldridge, J.M. 1996. “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 11(6): 619–632.Google Scholar
Rivers, D., and Vuong, Q.H. 1988. “Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models.” Journal of Econometrics 39(3): 347–366.Google Scholar
Roberts, J.A. 1996. “Green Consumers in the 1990s: Profile and Implications for Advertising.” Journal of Business Research 36(3): 217–232.Google Scholar
Silva, J. 2001. “A Score Test for Non-Nested Hypotheses with Applications to Discrete Response Models.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 16(5): 577–598.Google Scholar
Smith, R.J. 1987. “Testing for Exogeneity in Limited Dependent Variable Models Using a Simplified Likelihood Ratio Statistic.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 2(3): 237–245.Google Scholar
Thompson, G.D., and Kidwell, J. 1998. “Explaining the Choice of Organic Produce: Cosmetic Defects, Prices, and Consumer Preferences.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(2): 277–287.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2000. “National Organic Program, Program Standards.” Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Available at www.ams.usda.gov/nop/NOP/standards/FullText.pdf.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. 2003. “Unobserved Firm Heterogeneity and the Size-Exports Nexus: Evidence from German Panel Data.” Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 139(1): 161–172.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., and Sun, J. 2003. “Consumer Preference and Demand for Organic Food: Evidence from a Vermont Survey.” Manuscript presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association's annual meetings, July 27–30, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
White, H. 1982. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models.” Econometrica 50(2): 1–16.Google Scholar
Williams, P.R.D., and Hammitt, J.K. 2000. “A Comparison of Organic and Conventional Fresh Produce Buyers in the Boston Area.” Risk Analysis: An International Journal 20(5): 735–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yiridoe, E.K., Bonti-Ankomah, S., and Martin, R.C. 2005. “Comparison of Consumer Perceptions and Preference toward Organic Versus Conventionally Produced Foods: A Review and Update of the Literature.” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20(4): 193–205.Google Scholar