Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:46:53.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating Spatial Complexity into Economic Models of Land Markets and Land Use Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Yong Chen ,
Elena G. Irwin  and
Ciriyam Jayaprakash
Yong Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon
Elena G. Irwin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio
Ciriyam Jayaprakash
Affiliation:
Department of Physics at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent work in regional science, geography, and urban economics has advanced spatial modeling of land markets and land use by incorporating greater spatial complexity, including multiple sources of spatial heterogeneity, multiple spatial scales, and spatial dynamics. Doing so has required a move away from relying solely on analytical models to partial or full reliance on computational methods that can account for these added features of spatial complexity. In the first part of the paper, we review economic models of urban land development that have incorporated greater spatial complexity, focusing on spatial simulation models with spatial endogenous feedbacks and multiple sources of spatial heterogeneity. The second part of the paper presents a spatial simulation model of exurban land development using an auction model to represent household bidding that extends the traditional Capozza and Helsley (1990) model of urban growth to account for spatial dynamics in the form of local land use spillovers and spatially heterogeneous land characteristics.

Keywords

urban growthurbanizationland developmentspatial dynamicsheterogeneityagent-based modelsspatial interactions
Type
Invited Paper
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 321 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, W. 1964. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, R.J. 1980. “A Simple Urban-Growth Model with Durable Housing.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 10(1): 53–76.Google Scholar
Arnott, R.J. and Lewis, F.D. 1979. “The Transition of Land to Urban Use.” The Journal of Political Economy 87(1): 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, P. Keohane, N. and Timmins, C. 2009. “Migration and Hedonic Valuation: The Case of Air Quality.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Bayer, P.J. McMillen, R. Murphy, A. and Timmins, C. 2010. “A Dynamic Model of Demand for Houses and Neighborhoods.” Available at http://ssm.com/abstract=1717060 (accessed July 14, 2011).Google Scholar
Bayer, P. and Timmins, C. 2005. “On the Equilibrium Properties of Locational Sorting Models.” Journal of Urban Economics 57(3): 462–477.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R. Camacho, C. and Zou, B. 2009. “Bridging the Gap Between Growth Theory and the New Economic Geography: The Spatial Ramsey Model.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 13(1): 20–45.Google Scholar
Brock, W. and Xepapadeas, A. 2008. “Diffusion-Induced Instability and Pattern Formation in Infinite Horizon Recursive Optimal Control.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32(9): 2745–2787.Google Scholar
Capozza, D. and Helsley, R. 1989. “The Fundamentals of Land Prices and Urban Growth.” Journal of Urban Economics 26(3): 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capozza, D. and Helsley, R. 1990. “The Stochastic City.” Journal of Urban Economics 28(2): 187–203.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. Peeters, D. Cavailhes, J. and Rounsevell, M. 2007. “Spatial Configurations in a Periurban City: A Cellular Automata-Based Microeconomic Model.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 37(5): 542–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y. 2009. “Three Essays on the Interactions Between Regional Development and Natural Amenities.” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. Jayaprakash, C. and Irwin, E.G. 2010. “Exurban Land Development with Short Run Dynamics.” Paper presented at the 2010 North American Regional Science Council's annual meetings, Denver, CO (November 11-14, 2010).Google Scholar
Desmet, K. and Rossi-Hansberg, E. 2010. “On Spatial Dynamics.” Journal of Regional Science 50(1): 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. 2006. “Agent-Based Models and Human-Subject Experiments.” In Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K.L. eds., Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Epple, D. and Sieg, H. 1999. “Estimating Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdictions.” Journal of Political Economy 107(4): 645–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettema, D. 2011. “A Multi-Agent Model of Urban Processes: Modeling Relocation Processes and Price Setting in Housing Markets.” Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 35(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Filatova, T. Parker, D. and van der Veen, A. 2009. “Agent-Based Urban Land Markets: Agent's Pricing Behavior, Land Prices and Urban Land Use Change.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(1).Google Scholar
Filatova, T. van der Veen, A. and Parker, D. 2009. “Land Market Interactions Between Heterogeneous Agents in a Heterogeneous Landscape: Tracing the Macro-Scale Effects of Individual Trade-Offs Between Environmental Amenities and Disamenities.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(4): 431–457.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. and Krugman, P. 1995. “When Is the Economy Monocentric? Von Thünen and Chamberlin Unified.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 25(4): 505–528.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. and Ogawa, H. 1982. “Multiple Equilibria and Structural Transition of Nonmonocentric Urban Configuration.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 12(2): 161–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hommes, C. 2006. “Heterogeneous Agent Models in Economics and Finance.” In Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K.L. eds., Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Irwin, E.G. 2010. “New Directions for Urban Economic Models of Land Use Change: Incorporating Spatial Dynamics and Heterogeneity.” Journal of Regional Science 50(1): 65–91.Google Scholar
Klaiber, A. and Phaneuf, D. 2010. “Valuing Open Space in a Residential Sorting Model of the Twin Cities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 60(2): 57–77.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. 1991. “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy 99(3): 483–499.Google Scholar
LeBaron, B. 2006. “Agent-Based Computational Finance.” In Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K.L. eds., Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Magliocca, N. McConnell, V. and Walls, M. 2011. “Explaining Sprawl with an Agent-Based Model of Exurban Land and Housing Markets.” RFF Discussion Paper No. DP 11-33, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magliocca, N. McConnell, V. and Walls, M. Forthcoming. “Zoning on the Urban Fringe: Results from a New Approach to Modeling Land and Housing Markets.” Regional Science and Urban Economics.Google Scholar
McGarigal, K. Cushman, S.A. Neel, M.C. and Ene, E. 2002. “FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps.” Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html (accessed July 12, 2011).Google Scholar
Miller, E. Hunt, J.D. Abraham, J.E. and Salvini, P.A. 2004. “Microsimulating Urban Systems.” Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 28(1/2): 9–44.Google Scholar
Mills, E. 1967. “An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in Metropolitan Areas.” American Economic Review 3(2): 129–144.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. 2007. “A Dynamic Model of Housing Supply.” Available at http://apps.olin.wustl.edu/faculty/murphya/supply.pdf (accessed July 12, 2011).Google Scholar
Muth, R. 1969. Cities and Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ogawa, H. and Fujita, M. 1980. “Equilibrium Land Use in a Nonmonocentric City.” Journal of Regional Science 20(4): 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paciorek, A. 2010. “Supply Constraints and Housing Market Dynamics.” Real Estate Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Available at http://assets.wharton.upenn.edu/∼paciorek/Docs/Paciorek011511.pdf (accessed July 12, 2011).Google Scholar
Parker, D.C. and Filatova, T. 2008. “A Conceptual Design for a Bilateral Agent-Based Land Market with Heterogeneous Economic Agents.” Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 32(6): 454–463.Google Scholar
Parker, D.C. and Filatova, T. 2011. Personal communication, D. Parker, Associate Professor, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, and T. Filatova, Assistant Professor, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Parker, D.C. Manson, S.M. Janssen, M.A. Hoffmann, M. and Deadman, P. 2003. “Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Review.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(2): 314–317.Google Scholar
Smith, M. Sanchirico, J. and Wilen, J. 2009. “The Economics of Spatial-Dynamic Processes: Applications to Renewable Resources.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57(1): 104–121.Google Scholar
Smith, V.K. Sieg, H. Banzhaf, H.S. and Walsh, R. 2004. “General Equilibrium Benefits for Environmental Improvements: Projected Ozone Reductions under EPA's Prospective Analysis for the Los Angeles Air Basin.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47(3): 559–584.Google Scholar
Tajibaeva, L. Haight, R. and Polasky, S. 2008. “A Discrete-Space Urban Model with Environmental Amenities.” Resource and Energy Economics 30(2): 170–196.Google Scholar
Tesfatsion, L. 2006. “Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach to Economic Theory.” In Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K.L. eds., Handbook of Computational Economics: Agent-Based Computational Economics (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Turner, M.A. 2005. “Landscape Preferences and Patterns of Residential Development,” Journal of Urban Economics 57(1): 19–54.Google Scholar
Waddell, P. Borning, A. North, M. Freier, N. Becke, M. and Ulfarsson, G. 2003. “Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of UrbanSim.” Networks and Spatial Economics 3(1): 43–67.Google Scholar
Walsh, R.L. 2007. “Endogenous Open Space Amenities in a Locational Equilibrium.” Journal of Urban Economics 61(2): 319–344.Google Scholar
Wrenn, D. 2011. “Development Timing, Choice, and Pattern: Three Essays on the Conversion of Exurban Land.” Ph.D. thesis draft, Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Wu, J. and Plantinga, A.J. 2003. “The Influence of Public Open Space on Urban Spatial Structure.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(2): 288–309.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. Wrenn, D. and Irwin, E. 2011. “New Metrics for Quantifying Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Leapfrog Development.” Unpublished manuscript, Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar