Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:22:56.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Revenue Program Option in the 2008 U.S. Farm Bill: Evaluating Performance Characteristics of the ACRE Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Carl Zulauf  and
David Orden
Carl Zulauf
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio
David Orden
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in Washington, D.C., and Professor in the Institute for Society, Culture and Environment at Virginia Tech University in Blacksburg, Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Had only a farm program like the new ACRE state revenue program existed instead of the authorized 1996–2008 programs for com, soybeans, and wheat, farm support expenditures would have occurred earlier but totaled less. In contrast, at the higher prices forecast for the three crops over the 2009–2012 crop years, spending per acre is expected to be higher for acres enrolled in the ACRE program than for acres enrolled in the traditional programs. These results reflect the different design features of the two programs: revenue versus price assistance and assistance levels that adjust with lagged market revenue versus fixed nominal support triggers. The design issues and policy questions raised for both domestic policy considerations and WTO compliance are discussed.

Keywords

farm policyFood Conservation and Energy Act of 2008Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)WTO domestic support commitments
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , October 2010 , pp. 517 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blandford, D., and Josling, T. 2009. “The WTO Agricultural Modalities Proposals and Their Impact on Domestic Support in the EU and the US.” Paper prepared for the World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Blandford, D., and Orden, D. 2008. “United States: Shadow Domestic Agricultural Support Notifications.” Discussion Paper No. 821, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/ifpridp00821.pdf (accessed December 15, 2009).Google Scholar
Harrington, D.H., and Doering, O. 1993. “Agricultural Policy Reform: A Proposal.” Choices 8(1): 14–19.Google Scholar
Nelson, F., and Schertz, L. (eds.). 1996. “Provisions of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996.” Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 729, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Orden, D., Paarlberg, R., and Roe, T. 1999. Policy Reform in American Agriculture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schertz, L., and Doering, O. 1999. The Making of the 1996 Farm Act. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Congress, U.S. 2008. Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. H.R. 2419, U.S. Congress, Washington, D.C. Available at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=l10_cong_bills&docid=f:h2419enr.txt.pdf (accessed December 30, 2008).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2008. “The 2002 Farm Bill: Provisions and Economic Implications.” Administrative Publication No. AP-022 (E. Young, Coordinator), Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/AP/AP022/ (accessed December 3, 2008).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2009a. “Direct and Counter-Cyclical Program/ACRE.” Farm Service Agency, USDA, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=dccp&topic=landing (accessed November 2009).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2009b. “CCC Budget Essentials.” Farm Service Agency, USDA, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=about&subject=landing&topic=bap-bu-cc (accessed October 15, 2009).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2009c. “USDA Agricultural Projections to 2018.” Long-Term Projections Report No. OCE 2009-1, Office of the Chief Economist and World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2009d. “Data and Statistics: Quick Stats.” National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/Data_and_Statistics/Quick_Stats/index.asp (accessed November 2009).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. 2008. “Revised Draft Modalities for Agriculture.” Report No. TN/AG/W/4/Rev. 4, World Trade Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Zulauf, C., Dicks, M.R., and Vitale, J.D. 2008. “ACRE (Average Crop Revenue Election) Farm Program: Provisions, Policy Background, and Farm Decision Analysis.” Choices 23(3): 29–35.Google Scholar