Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:40:56.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulating the U.S. Impacts of Alternative Asian Soybean Rust Treatment Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Robert C. Johansson
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Senior authorship is shared equally between them
Michael J. Livingston
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Senior authorship is shared equally between them
John Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness at the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
Kurt Guidry
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness at the Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
Get access

Abstract

Asian soybean rust (rust) is an emerging issue in U.S. crop production and was identified in nine states during 2004. Recent farm surveys indicate that many producers are adjusting their management practices to the possibility of a rust infestation. The economic and environmental impacts of such adjustments are not known in the medium run given these new developments. We combine 2005 data on the geographical distribution of the fungal pathogen that causes rust with 2005 information on the availability and material costs of fungicides to analyze three treatment strategies. Our results indicate a higher range of economic impacts than previous research has indicated, but are consistent with earlier findings indicating that rust infestations will likely result in reduced soybean production, reduced exports, and higher prices.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BASF. 2003. “SBR Summary BASF 2003: Registrant Trials.” BASF Chemical Company, Mount Olive, NJ. Report available at http://www.ipmcenters.org/NewsAlerts/soybeanrust/SBR_summary_BASF_2003.pdf (accessed on February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
BASF. 2005. “Headline Product Information.” BASF Chemical Company, Mount Olive, NJ. Report available at http://www.agsolutions.ca/basf/agprocan/agsolutions/WebASProduct.nsf/WebProductProfileWest/Headline?OpenDocument (accessed on February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Bayer. 2003a. “Efficacy of Fungicides to Control Phakopsora pachyrhizi in Soybeans in Brazil: Registrant Trials.” Report available at http://www.ipmcenters.org/NewsAlerts/soy[-]beanrust/Brazil2002.pdf (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Bayer. 2003b. “Soybean Rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) Trials from Brazil—2002/03.” Report available at http://www.ipmcenters.org/NewsAlerts/soybeanrust/BayerBrazil2002-03.pdf (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Bayer. 2005. “Folicur Product Information.” Report available at http://www.bayercropscienceus.com/products/view:folicur/ (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Bromfield, K.R. 1984. Soybean Rust. Monograph No. 11, American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
Caldwell, P. and Laing, M. 2002. “Soybean Rust—A New Disease on the Move.Southern African Society for Plant Pathology, Stellenbosch, South Africa. Available at http://www.saspp.org/archived_articles/FeatureMarch.php (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Claassen, R. Heimlich, R.E. House, R.M. and Wiebe, K.D. 1998. “Estimating the Effects of Relaxing Agricultural Land Use Restrictions: Wetland Delineation in the Swampbuster Program.Review of Agricultural Economics 20(2): 390405.Google Scholar
Dorrance, A.E. Draper, M.A. and Hershman, D.E. 2005. “Using Foliar Fungicides to Manage Soybean Rust.” Media Distribution, Communications and Technology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Faeth, P. 1995. Growing Green: Enhancing the Economic and Environmental Performance of U.S. Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Hamilton, L.M. and Stakman, E.C. 1967. “Time of Stem Rust Appearance on Wheat in the Western Mississippi Basin in Relation to the Development of Epidemics from 1921 to 1962.Phytopathology 57(June): 609614.Google Scholar
House, R.M. McDowell, H. Peters, M. and Heimlich, R. 1999. “Agriculture Sector Resource and Environmental Policy Analysis: An Economic and Biophysical Approach.” In Barnett, V. ed., Environmental Statistics: Analyzing Data for Environmental Policy. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarPubMed
Howitt, R.E. 1995. “Positive Mathematical Programming.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(2): 329342.Google Scholar
Iowa State University Extension. 1994. “How a Soybean Plant Develops.” Special Report No. 53, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. Available at http:www.extension.iastate.edu/pages/hancock/agriculture/soybean/bean_develop/bean_toc.html (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Johansson, R.C. Cooper, J. and Vasavada, U. 2005. “Greener Acres or Greener Waters? Potential U.S. Impacts of Agricultural Trade Liberalization.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 34(1): 112.Google Scholar
Johansson, R.C. and Kaplan, J.D. 2004. “A Carrot and Stick Approach to Environmental Improvement: Marrying Agri-Environmental Payments and Water Quality Regulations.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 31(1): 91104.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J.D. Johansson, R.C. and Peters, M.A. 2004. “The Manure Hits the Land: Economic and Environmental Implications When Land Application of Nutrients Is Constrained.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(3): 688700.Google Scholar
Lence, S.H. 2000. “Using Consumption and Asset Return Data to Estimate Farmers' Time Preferences and Risk Attitudes.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(4): 934947.Google Scholar
Lin, W. Westcott, P.C. Skinner, R. Sanford, S. and De La Torre Ugarte, D.G. 2000. “Supply Response Under the 1996 Farm Act and Implications for the U.S. Field Crops Sector.” Technical Bulletin No. TB1888, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (September).Google Scholar
Livingston, M.J. Johansson, R. Daberkow, S. Roberts, M. Ash, M. and Breneman, V. 2004. “Economic and Policy Implications of Wind-Borne Entry of Asian Soybean Rust into the United States.” Outlook Report No. OCS-04D-02, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (April).Google Scholar
Miles, M.R. Frederick, R.D. and Hartman, G.L. 2003. “Soybean Rust: Is the U.S. Soybean Crop at Risk?The American Phytopathological Society feature story, available at http://apsnet.org/online/feature/rust/ (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Peters, M. Lewandrowski, J. House, R.M. and McDowell, H. 2001. “Economic Impacts of Carbon Charges on U.S. Agriculture.Climatic Change 50(4): 445473.Google Scholar
Pivonia, S. and Yang, X.B. 2003. “Assessment of Potential Year-Round Establishment of Phakopsora pachyrhizi in World Soybean Production Regions.” Poster, American Phytopathological Society Annual Meeting. Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
Stout, J. and Abler, D. 2003. “ERS/Penn State WTO Model Documentation.” Available at http://trade.aers.psu.edu/docu[-]mentation.cfm (accessed January 25, 2005).Google Scholar
University of Minnesota. 2005. “Diseases and Disease Management—Fungicide Table.Extension Service, St. Paul, MN. Available at http://www.soybeans.umn.edu/crop/dis[-]eases/soybeanrust.htm (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1997. Usual Planting and Harvesting Dates for U.S. Field Crops. Agricultural Handbook No. 628, National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2002. Strategic Plan to Minimize the Impact of the Introduction and Establishment of Soybean Rust on Soybean Production in the United States. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Riverdale, MD.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2003. “USDA Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2010.” Staff Report No. WAOB-2003-1, World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005a. “Prospective Plantings.National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005b. “A Coordinated Framework for Soybean Rust Surveillance, Reporting, Prediction, Management and Outreach.” Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.usda.gov/soy[-]beanrust/ (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005c. “Soybean Rust Information.Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.sbrusa.net/ (accessed February 15, 2006).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Various years. Agricultural Statistics. National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Various years. Brazil Oilseeds and Products. Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA, Sao Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Westcott, P.C. Young, C.E. and Price, J.M. 2002. “The 2002 Farm Act: Provisions and Implications for Commodity Markets.” Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 778, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington, D.C. (November).Google Scholar
Williams, G.W. Shumway, C.R. and Love, H.A. 2002. “Returns to Soybean Producers from Investments in Promotion and Research.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 31(1): 97111.Google Scholar
Yang, X.B. Tschanz, A.T. Dowler, W.M. and Wang, T.C. 1991. “Development of Yield Loss Models in Relation to Reductions of Components of Soybean Infected with Phakopsora pachyrhizi.Phytopathology 81 (November): 14201426.Google Scholar
Yorinori, J.T. Paiva, W.M. Frederick, R.D. Costamilan, L.M. Bertagnolli, P.F. Hartman, G.E. Godoy, C.V. and Nunes, J.N. Jr. 2003. “Epidemics of Soybean Rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) in Brazil and Paraguay from 2001 to 2003.Phytopathology 93(August): S103.Google Scholar