Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:30:17.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Socially Optimal Import Tariff and Tax Credit for Ethanol with Farm Subsidies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Harry de Gorter ,
David R. Just  and
Qinwen Tan
Harry de Gorter
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York
David R. Just
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York
Qinwen Tan
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Management at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York
Get access

Abstract

We determine how the U.S. ethanol tax credit and import tariff affect the corn-ethanol-gasoline markets and how farm subsidies interact with these policies. We show how the ethanol tax credit and import tariff each uniquely affect the ethanol and gasoline prices. The ethanol import tariff alone increases the terms of trade in ethanol imports and corn exports, but decreases the terms of trade in gasoline imports and the tax costs of farm price supports. With price-contingent farm subsidies in place, the optimal tariff and tax credit will depend on the price level. When farm subsidy expenditures are high, import subsidies for ethanol may increase social welfare due to the substantial size of the fuel market relative to the corn market.

Keywords

biofuelsethanoltariffstax creditwelfare
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 65 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, B. 2008a. “Situation, Outlook and Some Key Research Questions Pertaining to Biofuels.” Paper presented at the NC-1034 annual meeting, “Energy and Agriculture: Emerging Policy and R&D Issues” (March 7). Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Babcock, B. 2008b. “The Political Economy of the U.S. Crop Insurance Program.” Paper presented at the second AIEA2 and USDA international conference, “The Economic Implications of Public Support to Agriculture” (June 19–21) in Bologna Italy.Google Scholar
de Gorter, H., and Just, D.R. 2007a. “The Welfare Economics of an Excise-Tax Exemption for Biofuels and the Interaction Effects with Farm Subsidies.” Working Paper No. 2007–13, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
de Gorter, H., and Just, D.R. 2007b. “The Economics of U.S. Ethanol Import Tariffs With a Consumption Mandate and Tax Credit.” Working Paper No. 2007–21, Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Gorter, H., and Just, D.R. 2008. “‘Water’ in the U.S. Ethanol Tax Credit and Mandate: Implications for Rectangular Deadweight Costs and the Corn-Oil Price Relationship.” Review of Agricultural Economics 30(3): 397–410.Google Scholar
de Gorter, H., and Just, D.R. 2009. “The Welfare Economics of a Biofuel Tax Credit and the Interaction Effects with Price Contingent Farm Subsidies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
de Gorter, H., Just, D.R., and Kliauga, E.M. 2008. “Measuring the ‘Subsidy’ Component of Biofuel Policies.” Paper presented at the International Agricultural Trade Consortium (IATRC) annual meetings (December 7–9), Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar
Doornbosch, R., and Steenblik, R. 2007. “Biofuels: Is the Cure Worse than the Disease?” Report No. SG/SD/RT(2007), OECD Round Table on Sustainable Development (September 11–12), Paris, France.Google Scholar
Eidman, V.R. 2007. “Ethanol Economics of Dry Mill Plants.” In Corn-Based Ethanol in Illinois and the U.S.: A Report. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
Feenstra, R.C., and Taylor, A.M. 2007. International Economics. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Howse, R., van Bork, P., and Hebebrand, C. 2006. “WTO Disciplines and Biofuels: Opportunities and Constraints in the Creation of a Global Marketplace.” IPC discussion paper, International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Jank, M.J., Kutas, G., Amaral, L.F. do, and Nassar, A.M. 2007. EU and U.S. Policies on Biofuels: Potential Impact on Developing Countries. The German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 2008. “Ethanol: The Battle Continues.” Wall Street Journal (July 14). Available online at http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/07/14/ethanol-the-battle-continues/.Google Scholar
Kojima, M., Mitchell, D., and Ward, W. 2007. “Considering Trade Policies for Liquid Biofuels.” Energy Sector Management Assistance Programme, World Bank, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Koplow, D. 2007. “Ethanol—At What Cost? Government Support for Ethanol and Biodiesel in the United States: 2007 Update.” Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland. Google Scholar
Leiby, P.N. 2007. “Estimating the Energy Security Benefits of Reduced U.S. Oil Imports.” Report No. ORNL/TM-2007/028, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
Parry, I., and Small, K. 2005. “Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax?” American Economic Review 95(4): 1276–1289.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, D., Sexton, S.E., Roland-Holst, D., and Zilberman, D. 2007. “Challenge of Biofuel: Filling the Tank without Emptying the Stomach?” Environmental Research Letters 2(2): 1–9.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, D., and Zilberman, D. 2007. “Review of Environmental, Economic and Policy Aspects of Biofuels.” Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS4341, Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runge, C.F., and Senauer, B. 2007. “How Biofuels Could Starve the Poor.” Foreign Affairs 86(3): 41–53.Google Scholar
Schmitz, A., Moss, C.B., and Schmitz, T.G. 2007. “Ethanol: No Free Lunch.” Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 5(3): 1–26.Google Scholar
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R.A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., and Yu, T.-H. 2008. “Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land Use Change.” Science Express 319(5867): 1238–1240.Google ScholarPubMed
Tyner, W.E. 2007. “U.S. Ethanol Policy: Possibilities for the Future.” Working Paper No. ID-342-W, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2006. The Emerging Biofuels Market: Regulatory, Trade and Development Implications. United Nations, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar