Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:44:00.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological first principles for design competence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2010

Andy Dong
Andy Dong
Affiliation:
Design Lab, Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper interprets the concept of biologically inspired design as understanding design based on the biological evidence. Borrowing its concept of design competence from Chomsky's definition of linguistic competence, the paper reviews biological evidence from fields including evolution, genetics, and animal behavior from the perspective of design research to propose that design competence is the product of an evolutionary history during which five key developments in cognitive evolution came together: conception unbounded by sensory perception, symbolic manipulation at a level of metarepresentation, theory of mind, curiosity, and mental time travel. These cognitive capabilities were derived from the biological evidence based upon the criteria that they are presumed to be unique to humans (Homo sapiens), they may be lost because of neurodegenerative diseases or they may fail to develop because of neurodevelopmental disorders, and they are not immediately present upon birth and develop as a child's brain matures. Based on these five capabilities, the paper concludes by discussing how computation may provide a useful way to understand the origins and evolution of design competence.

Keywords

Biological EvidenceBiologically Inspired DesignComputationDesign Competence
Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 24 , Issue 4: Biologically Inspired Design , November 2010 , pp. 455 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adolphs, R. (2003). Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4(3), 165–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aiello, L.C. (1996). Terrestriality, bipedalism and the origin of language. In Evolution of Social Behaviour Patterns in Primates and Man (Runciman, W.G., Maynard Smith, J., & Dunbar, R.I.M., Eds.), pp. 262–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1987). Autism and symbolic play. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 5(2), 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, I.S. (1962). Response to nesting materials of wild born and captive born chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour 10(1–2), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilda, Z., & Gero, J.S. (2007). The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Design Studies 28(4), 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition 60(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boden, M.A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2nd ed.London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourguignon, E. (1979). Psychological Anthropology: An Introduction to Human Nature and Cultural Differences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1989). Declaration by design: rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. In Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism (Margolin, V., Ed.), pp. 91–109. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burgdorf, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006). The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 30(2), 173–187.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12(5), 187–192.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1987). Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P.J. (2009). Shaping things: intended consumer response and the other determinants of product form. Design Studies 30(3), 224–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1999). The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Day, R.L., Laland, K.N., & Odling-Smee, F.J. (2003). Rethinking adaptation: the niche-construction perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46(1), 80–95.Google Scholar
Deacon, T.W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: the Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 6(5), 178–190.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R.I.M., & Barrett, L. (2007). Evolutionary psychology in the round. In The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (Dunbar, R.I.M., & Barrett, L., Eds.), pp. 3–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26–36.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Glickman, S.E., & Sroges, R.W. (1966). Curiosity in zoo animals. Behaviour 26(1/2), 151–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gowlett, J.A.J. (2009). Artefacts of apes, humans, and others: towards comparative assessment and analysis. Journal of Human Evolution 57(4), 401–410.Google Scholar
Gurnell, A.M. (1998). The hydrogeomorphological effects of beaver dam-building activity. Progress in Physical Geography 22(2), 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henshilwood, C.S., d'Errico, F., Yates, R., Jacobs, Z., Tribolo, C., Duller, G.A.T., Mercier, N., Sealy, J.C., Valladas, H., Watts, I., & Wintle, A.G. (2002). Emergence of modern human behavior: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa. Science 295(5558), 1278–1280.Google Scholar
Hinton, G.E. (2010). Learning to represent visual input. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365(1537), 177–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgson, D. (2009). Symmetry and humans: reply to Mithen's “sexy handaxe theory.” Antiquity 83(319), 194–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houkes, W., Vermaas, P.E., Dorst, K., & de Vries, M.J. (2002). Design and use as plans: an action–theoretical account. Design Studies 23(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, C., & Hersch, R.D. (2001). Parameterizable fonts based on shape components. Computer Graphics and Applications 21(3), 70–85.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.R., Kabwasa-Green, F., & Herranz, J. (2006). Cultural Vitality in Communities: Interpretation and Indicators. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Jaenicke, C., & Ehrlich, A. (1982). Effects of animate vs. inanimate stimuli on curiosity behavior in greater galago and slow loris. Primates 23(1), 95–104.Google Scholar
Jarrold, C., Boucher, J., & Smith, P. (1993). Symbolic play in autism: a review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 23(2), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jupp, J.R., & Gero, J.S. (2006). A qualitative feature-based characterization of 2D architectural style. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(11), 1537–1550.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. (2001). Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure—an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5(2), 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, S., Dowman, M., & Griffiths, T. L. (2007). Innateness and culture in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(12), 5241–5245.Google Scholar
Klein, R.G. (2000). Archeology and the evolution of human behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 9(1), 17–36.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, M., & Mithen, S. (1999). Handaxes: products of sexual selection? Antiquity 73(281), 518–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K.N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M.W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(1), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K.N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M.W. (2001). Cultural niche construction and human evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14(1), 22–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laland, K.N., Sterelny, K., & Harrison, R. (2006). Perspective: seven reasons (not) to neglect niche construction. Evolution 60(9), 1751–1762.Google Scholar
Latchman, D.S. (1997). Transcription factors: an overview. International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 29(12), 1305–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, R.-S., Koob, G.F., & Henriksen, S.J. (1998). Electrophysiological responses of nucleus accumbens neurons to novelty stimuli and exploratory behavior in the awake, unrestrained rat. Brain Research 799(2), 317–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A.M. (1987). Pretense and representation: the origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review 94(4), 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Williams, D. (2002). The Mind in the Cave: Consciousness and the Origins of Art. London: Thames and Hudson, Ltd.Google Scholar
Liégeois, F., Baldeweg, T., Connelly, A., Gadian, D.G., Mishkin, M., & Vargha-Khadem, F. (2003). Language fMRI abnormalities associated with FOXP2 gene mutation. Nature Neuroscience 6, 1230–1237.Google Scholar
Lillard, A.S. (1993). Pretend play skills and the child's theory of mind. Child Development 64(2), 348–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marean, C.W., Bar-Matthews, M., Bernatchez, J., Fisher, E., Goldberg, P., Herries, A.I.R., Jacobs, Z., Jerardino, A., Karkanas, P., Minichillo, T., Nilssen, P.J., Thompson, E., Watts, I., & Williams, H.M. (2007). Early human use of marine resources and pigment in South Africa during the Middle Pleistocene. Nature 449(7164), 905–908.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1990). The Clockwork Muse: The Predictability of Artistic Change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mayeaux, D., & Mason, W. (1998). Development of responsiveness to novel objects in the titi monkey, Callicebus moloch. Primates 39(4), 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcbrearty, S., & Brooks, A.S. (2000). The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution 39(5), 453–563.Google Scholar
Mesulam, M.M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain 121(6), 1013–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Mervis, C.B., & Berman, K.F. (2006). Neural mechanisms in Williams syndrome: a unique window to genetic influences on cognition and behavior. Nature 7, 380–393.Google Scholar
Moessner, R., Marshall, C.R., Sutcliffe, J.S., Skaug, J., Pinto, D., Vincent, J., Zwaigenbaum, L., Fernandez, B., Roberts, W., Szatmari, P., & Scherer, S.W. (2007). Contribution of SHANK3 mutations to autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Human Genetics 81(6), 1289–1297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D. (1999). Linguistic Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. (1998). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. (2005). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Osvath, M. (2009). Spontaneous planning for future stone throwing by a male chimpanzee. Current Biology 19(5), R190–R191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Toole, M. (1994). The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the Representational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perner, J., & Doherty, M. (2005). Do infants understand that external goals are internally represented? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(5), 710–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontzer, H., Raichlen, D.A., & Sockol, M.D. (2009). The metabolic cost of walking in humans, chimpanzees, and early hominins. Journal of Human Evolution 56(1), 43–54.Google Scholar
Powell, A., Shennan, S., & Thomas, M.G. (2009). Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324(5932), 1298–1301.Google Scholar
Purcell, A.T., & Gero, J.S. (1998). Drawings and the design process: a review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies 19(4), 389–430.Google Scholar
Reader, S.M., & Laland, K.N. (2003). Animal innovation: an introduction. In Animal Innovation (Reader, S.M., & Laland, K.N., Eds.), pp. 3–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, W.A., & Feeney, M.C. (2009). The comparative study of mental time travel. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(6), 271–277.Google Scholar
Rushbrook, B.J., Dingemanse, N.J., & Barber, I. (2008). Repeatability in nest construction by male three-spined sticklebacks. Animal Behaviour 75(2), 547–553.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S., Dong, A., & Gero, J.S. (2009). Design optimization problem (re)-formulation using singular value decomposition. Journal of Mechanical Design 131(8), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, S., Dong, A., & Gero, J.S. (2010). Learning symbolic formulations in design: syntax, semantics, knowledge reification. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 24(1), 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, R. (2007). Towards a computational model of creative societies using curious design agents. In Engineering Societies in the Agents World VII (O'Hare, G., Ricci, A., O'Grady, M., & Dikenelli, O., Eds.), Vol. 4457, pp. 340–353. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stahmer, A. (1995). Teaching symbolic play skills to children with autism using pivotal response training. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 25(2), 123–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steels, L. (2003). Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(7), 308–312.Google Scholar
Steels, L., & Kaplan, F. (2002). AIBO's first words: the social learning of language and meaning. Evolution of Communication 4(1), 3–32.Google Scholar
Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human–Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T. (1999). The rise of the metamind. In The Descent of Mind: Psychological Perspectives on Hominid Evolution (Corballis, M.C., & Lea, S.E.G., Eds.), pp. 218–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T., & Busby, J. (2003). Mental time travel in animals? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(9), 391–396.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M.C. (1997). Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 123(2), 133–167.Google ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M.C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: what is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30(3), 299–313.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T., & Whiten, A. (2001). Mental evolution and development: evidence for secondary representation in children, great apes and other animals. Psychological Bulletin 127(5), 629–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science 2(3), 67–70.Google Scholar
Tutin, C., Parnell, R., White, L., & Fernandez, M. (1995). Nest building by lowland gorillas in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon: environmental influences and implications for censusing. International Journal of Primatology 16(2), 53–76.Google Scholar
Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D.G., Copp, A., & Mishkin, M. (2005). FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(2), 131–138.Google Scholar
Wojcieszek, J.M., Nicholls, J.A., & Goldizen, A.W. (2007). Stealing behavior and the maintenance of a visual display in the satin bowerbird. Behavioral Ecology 18(4), 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youn-Kyung, L., Erik, S., & Josh, T. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions Computer–Human Interaction 15(2), 1–27.Google Scholar