Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:04:14.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formalizing abstract characteristics of style

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2006

KIMBERLE KOILE
KIMBERLE KOILE
Affiliation:
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper claims that style, in addition to being identified by common visible physical characteristics of form, can be thought of in terms of a set of common abstract characteristics. A prototype computational design support tool is described that explores this idea in the domain of architecture. The Architect's Collaborator (TAC) supports articulation and evaluation of abstract characteristics of style (e.g., experiential characteristics such as privacy and shelter) and does so by mapping abstract characteristics to details of physical form. The implementation of TAC is described and successful experiments are reported in which abstract characteristics of Frank Lloyd Wright's Prairie houses were mapped to physical form characteristics and used to evaluate Prairie and non-Prairie houses.

Keywords

ArchitectureArtificial IntelligenceComputer-Aided DesignFrank Lloyd WrightStyle
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , August 2006 , pp. 267 - 285
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arnheim, R. (1977). The Dynamics of Architectural Form. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Benedikt, M.L. (1979). To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B, 6(1), 47–65.Google Scholar
Brooks, H.A. (1972). The Prairie School. New York: Norton.
Chan, C.-S. (1992). Exploring individual style through Wright's designs. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 9(2), 207–238.Google Scholar
Chan, C.-S. (2000). Can style be measured? Design Studies, 21(2), 277–291.Google Scholar
Do, E.Y.-L. & Gross, M.D. (1997). Tools for visual and spatial analysis of CAD models: implementing computer tools as a means of thinking about architecture. Proc. CAAD Futures '97, pp. 189–202.
Gross, M.D. (1996). The Electronic Cocktail Napkin—a computational environment for working with design diagrams. Design Studies 17(1), 53–69.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, G. (1991). The Wright Space: Pattern and Meaning in Frank Lloyd Wright's Houses. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Hillier, B. & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hitchcock, H.R. (1942). The Nature of Materials 1887–1941: The Buildings of Frank Lloyd Wright. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
Hwang, J.-E. & Koile, K. (2005). Heuristic Nolli map: a preliminary study in representing the public domain in urban space. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, London, June 29–July 1, 2005.
Jones, R.T. (1987). Authentic Small Homes of the Twenties: Illustrations and Floorplans of 254 Characteristic Homes. New York: Dover.
Kincaid, D.S. (1997). An arithmetical model of spatial definition. MS Thesis, MIT, Department of Architecture.
Koile, K. (2001). The Architect's Collaborator: toward intelligent tools for conceptual design. MIT AI Technical Report 2001-1. PhD Thesis, MIT, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
Koile, K. (2004). An intelligent assistant for conceptual design: informed search using a mapping of abstract qualities to physical form. Design Computing and Cognition '04 (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 3–22. Cambridge, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Lewis, A. (1982). American Country Seats of the Gilded Age. New York: Dover.
Manson, G.C. (1958). Frank Lloyd Wright to 1910: The First Golden Age. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
McCoy, E. (1987). Five California Architects. New York: Hennessey & Ingalls.
Peponis, J., Dalton, R.C., Wineman, J., & Dalton, N. (2004). Measuring the effects of layout upon visitors' spatial behaviors in open plan exhibition settings, Environment and Planning B, 31(3), 453–473.Google Scholar
Pinnell, P. (1990). Academic tradition and the individual talent: similarity and difference in the formation of Frank Lloyd Wright. In Frank Lloyd Wright: A Primer on Architectural Principles (McCarter, R., Ed.), pp. 19–58. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Rapoport, A. (1977). Human Aspects of Urban Form: Towards a Man–Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Rassmusen, S.E. (1964). Experiencing Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Scully, V., Jr. (1971). The Shingle Style and Stick Style: Architectural Theory and Design From Richardson to the Beginnings of Wright. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Stickley, G. (1982). More Craftsman Homes: Floor Plans and Illustrations for 78 Mission Style Dwellings. New York: Dover.
Storrer, W.A. (1993). The Frank Lloyd Wright Companion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Twombly, R.C. (1979). Frank Lloyd Wright: His Life and His Architecture. New York: Wiley.
Wright, G. (1980). Moralism and the Model Home: Domestic Architecture and Cultural Conflict in Chicago 1873–1913. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wright, G. (1981). Building a Dream: A Social History of Housing in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.