Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:27:18.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Knowledge transformers: A link between learning and creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2005

SIANG KOK SIM  and
ALEX H.B. DUFFY
SIANG KOK SIM
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Republic of Singapore
ALEX H.B. DUFFY
Affiliation:
CAD Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether knowledge transformers that are featured in the learning process are also present in the creative process. First, this was achieved by reviewing accounts of inventions and discoveries with the view of explaining them in terms of knowledge transformers. Second, this was achieved by reviewing models and theories of creativity and identifying the existence of the knowledge transformers. The investigation shows that there is some evidence to show that the creative process can be explained through knowledge transformers. Hence, it is suggested that one of links between learning and creativity is through the knowledge transformers.

Keywords

CreativityDiscoveryInventionKnowledge TransformersLearning
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , August 2004 , pp. 271 - 279
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J.R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist 48, 35–44.Google Scholar
Arciszewski, T. & Michalski, R.S. (1994). Inferential Design Theory: A conceptual outline. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '94, pp. 295–308. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Boden, M. (1991). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. New York: Basic Books.
Brophy, D.R. (1998). Understanding, measuring and enhancing individual creative problem-solving efforts. Creativity Research Journal 11, 123–150.Google Scholar
Campbell, D.T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thoughts as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review 67, 380–400.Google Scholar
DasGupta, S. (1994). Creativity in Invention and Design—Computational and Cognitive Explorations of Technological Originality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DasGupta, S. (1996). Technology and Creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S.M. (1995). The Creative Cognition Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fisher, G. & Nakakoji, K. (1997). Computational environments supporting creativity in the context of lifelong learning and design. Knowledge-Based Systems 10, 21–28.Google Scholar
Flatow, I. (1992). They All Laughed … From Light Bulbs to Lasers: The Fascinating Stories Behind the Great Inventions That Have Changed Their Lives. New York: Harper Collins.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frame of Minds: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
Goldenburg, J. & Mazursky, D. (2002). Creativity in Product Innovation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kocabas, S. (1991). A review of learning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 6(3), 195–222.Google Scholar
Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson & Co.
Li, R. (1996). A Theory of Conceptual Intelligence. New York: Praeger.
Nayak, P.R. & Ketteringham, J.M. (1986). Breakthroughs! New York: Rawson Associates.
Newell, A. (1982). The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence 18, 87–127.Google Scholar
Michalski, R.S. (1993). Inferential theory of learning as a conceptual basis for multi-strategy learning. Machine Learning 11, 3–43.Google Scholar
Mumford, M.D., Mobley, M.I., Uhlman, C.E., Reiter–Palmon, R., & Doares, L.M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal 4, 91–122.Google Scholar
Perkins, D.N. (1981). The Mind's Best Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sim, S.K. (2000). Modelling learning in design. PhD Thesis. Glasgow, UK: University of Strathclyde.
Sim, S.K. & Duffy, A.H.B. (1998). A foundation for machine learning in design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 12, 193–209.Google Scholar
Sim, S.K. & Duffy, A.H.B. (2004). Evolving a model of learning in design. Research in Engineering Design 15, 40–61.Google Scholar
Simonton, D.K. (1988). Scientific Genius: A Psychology of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strathern, P. (1997). Crick, Watson & DNA. London: Arrow.
Sutton, R.I. (2002). Weird Ideas That Work, p. 26. New York: Free Press.
Taylor, C.W. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In The Nature of Creativity (Sternberg, R.J., Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wallace, D.B. & Gruber, H.E. (1992). Creative People at Work: Twelve Cognitive Case Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weisberg, R.W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Wilkes, M.V. (1986). The genesis of microprogramming. Annals of the History of Computing 8(2), 116–118.Google Scholar