Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:55:15.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling concept design evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Graham Green
Graham Green
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the development of models to simulate the process of Concept Design Evaluation. The models are an amalgam of a number of statistically based methods and approaches taken from the probability, reliability, and quality domains. They assume that designers use decomposition of design to undertake evaluation at design characteristic level with the total design evaluation being achieved, in some way, via recomposition. The models described in this paper attempt to describe how designers may perform recomposition and hence total design evaluation. It is argued that the ability to model this human activity is important for the future development of knowledge-based design tools.

Keywords

Design EvaluationConcept DesignKnowledge-based Design ToolsStatistical Methods
Type
Articles
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , June 1997 , pp. 211 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bjarnemo, R. (1994). Towards a computer implementable evaluation procedure for the mechanical engineering design process. Doctoral Thesis. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Bjarnemo, R., & Akesson, A. (1983). On the general requirements for the evaluation procedure in the engineering design process. Proc. ICED 83, 359–365.Google Scholar
Chen, J.L., & Lee, C.R. (1993). Qualitative programming method for qualitative design evaluation in the conceptual design stage. J. Eng. Design 4(3), 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterline, A., & Kota, S. (1992). A general paradigm for routine design-theory and implementation. Al EDAM 6(2), 73–93.Google Scholar
Green, G. (1994). Evaluation activity within the conceptual phase of the engineering design process. PhD Thesis. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Hurst, K.S. (1990). Spreadsheet analysis applied to the concept selection phase of engineering design. Proc: ICED 90, 471–484.Google Scholar
Hyde, R.S., & Stauffer, L.A. (1990). The comparison of the reliability of three psychometric scales for measuring design quality. ASME—Design Theory and Methodology Conf., pp. 349–354. ASME, New York.Google Scholar
Ishii, K., et al. (1988). Application of design compatibility analysis to simultaneous engineering. AIEDAM 2(1), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii, K. et al. , (1989). A model of simultaneous engineering design. In Artifcial Intelligence and Design (Gero, J.S., Ed.), (pp. 483–501). Computational Mechanics Publ., Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Jansson, D.G. et al. , (1990). Generalised measures of manufacturability. ASME—Design Theory and Methodology Conf., pp. 85–96. ASME, New York.Google Scholar
Kupparju, N. et al. , (1985). Design through selection: A method that works. Design Studies 6(2), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, M.L. (1989). Synthesis and evaluation of preliminary designs. In Artificial Intelligence and Design (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 3–14. Computational Mechanics Publ., Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Pugh, S. (1991). Total design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Shah, J.J. et al. , (1990). A framework for manufacturability evaluation in a feature based CAD system. Proc. NSF Conf. on Design and Manufacturing System Research. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
Taylor, A.J., & Ben, N.T. (1993). Enhancement of design evaluation during concept design. ICED 93, 481–484.Google Scholar
Thurston, D.L. (1990). Subjective design evaluation with multiattributes. ASME—Design Theory and Methodology Conf., pp. 355–361. ASME, New York.Google Scholar
Tsiotsias, A.S. (1994). Design method and management utility enabling concurrent exercise of distributed expertise. PhD Thesis. University of Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar