Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:42:45.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A scenario-integrated approach for functional design of smart systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2021

Fajun Gui Open the ORCID record for Fajun Gui [Opens in a new window]  and
Yong Chen
Fajun Gui
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai200240, China
Yong Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
*
Author for correspondence: Yong Chen, E-mail: mechenyong@sjtu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Functional design is regarded as a design activity primarily aimed at clarifying customer needs, and developing the functional architecture and solution concepts for a system under development. Existing functional design approaches are mainly focused on how to assist designers in searching for solution principles for desired products, which, however, do not adequately take into account the interactions between a smart system under development and its environment, and cannot explicitly represent the complex functional logic of the system, resulting in that they cannot effectively assist designers in the functional design of smart systems. Therefore, this paper proposes a scenario-integrated approach for functional design of smart systems to address the above issues. Based on the concept of scenario in software engineering, the proposed approach explicitly elaborates how to employ scenarios to express subjective customer needs and how to generate the functional architectures and the corresponding solution concepts through a structured process. The functional design of the automated doors-unlocking system of a smart vehicle is employed to illustrate the proposed approach, which also demonstrates that the proposed approach is suitable for functional design of smart systems.

Keywords

Functional designfunctional modelingModel-Based Systems Engineeringscenariosmart systemsSysML
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 35 , Special Issue 2: Thematic Collection: Smart Design of Smart Systems , May 2021 , pp. 165 - 179
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, IF and Stevens, R (2002) Writing Better Requirements. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Aurisicchio, M, Bracewell, R and Armstrong, G (2013) The function analysis diagram: intended benefits and coexistence with other functional models. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, JW, Reid, TN, Eckert, C and Ramani, K (2015) Comparing functional analysis methods for product dissection tasks. Journal of Mechanical Design 137, 081101, 1-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, MI, Cagan, J and Kotovsky, K (2003) The A-design approach to managing automated design synthesis. Research in Engineering Design 14, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, JM (2000) Five reasons for scenario-based design. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, HICSS-32. Hawaii: IEEE.Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A and Bligh, TP (1996) An approach to functional synthesis of mechanical design concepts: theory, applications and merging research issues. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10, 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Liu, ZL and Xie, YB (2012) A knowledge-based framework for creative conceptual design of multi-disciplinary systems. Computer-Aided Design 44, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Zhao, M, Xie, YB and Zhang, ZN (2015) A new model of conceptual design based on scientific ontology and intentionality theory. Part II: the process model. Design Studies 38, 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, EL (1998) Functional analysis: a system conceptual design tool [and application to ATC system]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 34, 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelenburg, S, Janssen, M and Klievink, B (2019) Designing context-aware systems: a method for understanding and analysing context in practice. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming 103, 79–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erden, MS, Komoto, H, Van Beek, TJ, D'Amelio, V, Echavarria, E and Tomiyama, T (2008) A review of function modeling: approaches and applications. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 22, 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedenthal, S, Moore, A and Steiner, R (2006) OMG systems modeling language (OMG SysML) tutorial. INCOSE Intl. Symp., 11 July 2006, Orlando, Florida, Vol. 9, pp. 65–67.Google Scholar
Friedenthal, S, Moore, A and Steiner, R (2014) A Practical Guide to SysML: the Systems Modeling Language. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, HP (2011) Model-basedsystems engineering with rational rhapsody and rational harmony for systems engineering. Deskbook Release 3.Google Scholar
Hong, JY, Suh, EH and Kim, SJ (2009) Context-aware systems: a literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 8509–8522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, I (1993) Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Bengaluru: Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
Kaindl, H (2000) A design process based on a model combining scenarios with goals and functions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 30, 537–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitamura, Y, Kashiwase, M, Fuse, M and Mizoguchi, R (2004) Deployment of ontological framework of functional design knowledge. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, ZL, Zhang, ZN and Chen, Y (2012) A scenario-based approach for requirements management in engineering design. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 20, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mhenni, F, Choley, JY, Penas, O, Plateaux, R and Hammadi, M (2014) A SysML-based methodology for mechatronic systems architectural design. Advanced Engineering Informatics 28, 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahl, G and Beitz, W (2007) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 3rd Edn. London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, K (2010) Requirements Engineering: Fundamentals, Principles, and Techniques. New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roozenburg, NFM and Eekels, J (1995) Product Design: Fundamental and Methods. West Sussex: John Wile & Sons.Google Scholar
Rumbaugh, J, Blaha, M, Premerlani, W, Eddy, F & Lorensen, WE (1991) Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Vol. 199. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Suh, NP (2001) Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Umeda, Y, Takeda, H and Tomiyama, T (1990) Function, behaviour, and structure. In Gero, JS (ed.), Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering V, Vol. 1. Berlin: Computational Mechanics Publications/Springer-Verlag., pp. 177–193.Google Scholar
Umeda, Y, Ishii, M, Yoshioka, M, Shimomura, Y and Tomiyama, T (1996) Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, L, Liu, YS, Sun, ZF, Cao, YL and Qamar, A (2016) A hybrid approach for the automation of functional decomposition in conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design 27, 333–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar