Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:18:34.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The English Landscape Garden in the Eighteenth Century: The Cultural Importance of an English Institution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Joan Bassin
Get access

Extract

Art historians and cultural historians have noted what appears to be a puzzle in eighteenth-century history, a puzzle which emerges from an apparent conflict of the following trend: as English country houses became more and more classical, the gardens around them became less so. That is, as architecture progressively conformed to the principles of universal order and mathematical geometry embodied in the Palladian ideal, gardens seemed to repudiate those same principles, embracing irregularity and particularity. Another apparently contradictory trend is noteworthy: as country houses became smaller through the eighteenth century, the gardens around them became larger. By the later eighteenth century people of means seem to have preferred smallish houses in acres of parkland, rather than enormous houses in small, formal gardens.

There are two possible ways of approaching this problem. The first is simply to ignore the contradiction and accept the houses and gardens as products of separate traditions. Most art historians have done this, fitting the houses and gardens respectively into the classical and romantic traditions. The houses are said to be classical in style because they were intended to appeal to the reasoning faculties of the Enlightenment mind, while the gardens are called romantic because they were designed to appeal principally to the subjective and non-rational faculties, the senses and the emotions. The puzzle of classical houses in romantic gardens simply does not arise when an author such as Hussey, for example, examines the history of gardens, or when Summerson writes about the classical country house.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1979 , pp. 15 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This essay is the result of work done in a seminar sponsored by the National Endowment for the Humanities. I am indebted to them for their support, to my colleagues in the seminar for their collective help, and to Professor Sheldon Rothblatt, the director, whose patience and encouragement have both aided and inspired me.

2 Hussey, Christopher, English Gardens and Landscapes 1700-1750 (London, 1967)Google Scholar. Summerson, John, “The Classical Country House in Eghteenth-Century England,” Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 107 (July 1959): 539–87.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., p. 540.

4 Tucker, Susie I., Protean Shape. A Study in Eighteenth Century Vocabulary and Usage (London, 1967).Google Scholar

5 Probably the best book on the subject it Malins, Edward, English Landscaping and Literature. 1660-1840 (London, 1966).Google Scholar

6 Mack, Maynard, The Garden and the City; Retirement and Politics in the Later Poetry of Pope, 1731-1743 (Toronto, 1969), p. 57.Google Scholar

7 Wittkower, Rudolf, “English Neo-Palladianism, the Landscape Garden, China and the Enlightenment,” in Palladio and English Palladianism (London, 1974).Google Scholar

8 Lang, S., “The Genesis of the Landscape Garden,” in Pevsner, N., ed., The Picturesque Garden and Its Influence Outside the British Isles (Dumbarton Oaks, 1974), p. 22.Google Scholar

9 Langley, Batty, New Principles of Gardening (London, 1728).Google Scholar

10 Habakkuk, H.J., “English Landownership 1680-1740,” Economic History Review 10 (Feb. 1940): 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Stroud, Dorothy, Capability Brown (London, 1950), pp. 121–2.Google Scholar

12 Walpole, Horace, “The History of the Modern Taste in Gardening,” in Chase, Isabel, Horace Walpole: Gardenist (Princeton, 1943), p. 34.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., p. 25.

14 Stroud, p. 134.

15 Stroud, p. 132.

16 Reginald Bloomfield and Thomas, F. Inigo, The Formal Garden in England (London, 1892), p. 79.Google Scholar

17 Hussey, p. 27.

18 Quoted in Clark, H.F., The English Landscape Garden (London, 1948), p. 23.Google Scholar

19 Habakkuk, 9-10.

20 Clifford, Derek, A History of Garden Design (N.Y., 1963), pp. 98–99.Google Scholar

21 Blomfleld and Thomas, p. 75.

22 H.F. Clark, p. 30.

23 Thompson, E.P., “Patrician Society, Plebian Culture,” Journal of Social History, 7 (Summer 1974): 382–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

24 Perkin, Harold, The Origins of Modern English Society, 1780-1880 (London, 1969), pp. 183–196.Google Scholar

25 Kliger, Samuel, “Whig Aesthetics: A Phase of Eighteenth-Century Taste,” English Literary History, 16 (1949): 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Summerson, p. 567.

27 Williams, Raymond, The Country and the City (London, 1974)Google Scholar, has a good discussion of the pastoral ideal.

28 Colton, Judith, “Merlin's Lair and Queen Caroline; Garden An as Propaganda,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 1 (Fall, 1976): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Hussey, p. 92.

30 Blomfield and Thomas, p. 15.

31 The extent of Brown's work and influence is shown in this anecdote: when he was offered £1,000 by the Duke of Leinster to go to Ireland, he refused on the grounds that he had “not yet finished England” (Stroud, p. 202).