Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:34:16.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fairfax and the Lifeguard's Colors*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

J. Mark Heumann
Get access

Extract

On Wednesday, 23 February 1647/8, General Sir Thomas Fairfax received a petition from his Lifeguard protesting the terms under which they were ordered to be disbanded. Finding the General unsympathetic, some of the soldiers went to the cornet's lodgings at the Bell in Gray's Inn Lane and carried away the troop colors, hiding them at the Lamb on Snow Hill. The Council of War regarded this act “as a great Disrespect and Dishonor to the General” and interrogated members of the Lifeguard. On Friday, the Council condemned one Master William Clarke to be shot to death for mutiny and disobeying the commands of superior officers. On Saturday, the Lifeguard presented another petition, begging pardon for Clarke and submitting to the General's authority in the most abject terms. Clarke himself also petitioned for pardon, asserting as his motives “the not punctually performing of the Agreement made at Windsor, and to vindicate the General's Honor therein. After some consideration, Fairfax called Clarke in, pardoned him, and set him free.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , Fall 1994 , pp. 443 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was prepared originally for the 1990 National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Seminar for College Teachers entitled “The Protestant Imagination” and conducted by Professor John N. King at Ohio State University. I thank Professor King, Professor Phoebe Spinrad, and the members of the seminar.

References

1 Rushworth, John, Historical Collections, vol. 7 (London, 1701), pp. 1006-07, 1009Google Scholar; cf. Perfect Diurnall, No. 239, 21-28 February 1647/1648, p. 1925Google Scholar, and Sir William Clarke Manuscripts 1640-1664 (Brighton, Sussex, 1979, microfilm), ser. 2, vol. 4 (Worcester College vol. CX)Google Scholar.

2 Rushworth, , Historical Collections, 7: 1010Google Scholar.

3 Col.Rogers, H. C. B., Battles and Generals of the Civil Wars 1642-1651 (London, 1968), p. 209Google Scholar; Peacock, Edward, ed., The Army Lists of the Roundheads and Cavaliers (London, 1863), p. 45Google Scholar.

4 Journals of the House of Commons [CJ] 4: 415Google Scholar; Journals of the House of Lords 8: 163Google Scholar.

5 The Clarke Papers, ed. Firth, C. H., vol. 1, Camden Society Publications, 2nd ser., 49 (London, 1891), p. 18Google Scholar.

6 Kishlansky, Mark A., The Rise of the New Model Army (Cambridge, 1979), pp. 64–65Google Scholar; The Memoirs of Edmund Ludlow, ed. Firth, C. H., 2 vols. (Oxford, 1894), 1: 39Google Scholar; Firth, C. H. and Davies, Godfrey, The Regimental History of Cromwell's Army, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1940), p. 44Google Scholar.

7 Elton, Richard, The Compleat Body Of The Art Military (London, 1650), p. 177Google Scholar. In Severall Ordinances of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament: For the Disbanding… (London [24 December] 1647)Google Scholar, the Gentlemen of the Lifeguard are ranked with deputies, clerks, assistants, surgeon's mates, and commissioned officers of foot and train in having their arrears reduced one-quarter part for free quarter (p. 11). They were also paid three shillings more per day than the ordinary trooper, placing their wage equal to that of the lowest ranking officers (Firth, and Davies, , Regimental History, p. 45Google Scholar; Gentles, Ian, The New Model Army in England, Ireland and Scotland, 1645-1653 [Oxford, 1992], p. 47)Google Scholar.

8 Kishlansky, , New Model Army, pp. 64–65Google Scholar.

9 Clarke Papers, 1: 40-41, xxiv, 44, 59-62, 113; Bodleian Library, Tanner Mss, vol. 58, fol. 153r–v.

10 Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 231 r.

11 Rushworth, , Historical Collections, vol. 6 (London, 1722), pp. 465, 551Google Scholar; Bodleian Library, Tanner Mss, vol. 58, fol. 64r, 65v; Firth, and Davies, , Regimental History, p. 48Google Scholar.

12 Mercurius Pragmaticus, No. 3, 28 September-6 October 1647, p. 24Google Scholar [British Library, Burney 14a]; Heath, James, Flagellum (London, 1663), p. 57Google Scholar; Anthony Wood, Fasti (DNB, s.v. “Cromwell, Henry”); Woolrych, Austin, Soldiers and Statesmen (Oxford, 1987), p. 131nCrossRefGoogle Scholar, citing Firth, and Davies, , Regimental History, p. 179Google Scholar.

13 CJ 5: 183; Perfect Diurnall, No. 201, 31 May-7 June 1647, pp. 1607, 1613Google Scholar; Kishlansky, , New Model Army, pp. 176, 229Google Scholar.

14 Mercurius Pragmaticus, No. 10, 16-23 November 1647, p. 3Google Scholar [British Library, Bumey 14a]; Perfect Diurnall, No. [226], 22-29 November 1647, p. 1818Google Scholar; Perfect Occurrences, No. 48, 26 November-3 December 1647, p. 336Google Scholar.

15 An Humble Representation from His Excellencie Sir Thomas Fairfax … Concerning Their past endeavours (London, [8 December] 1647)Google Scholar; Kingdomes Weekly Intelligencer, No. 237, 30 November–7 December 1647, p. 755Google Scholar.

16 Perfect Diurnall, No. 230, 20-27 December 1647, p. 1856Google Scholar.

17 Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 30, f. 216r.

18 Gentles, , New Model Army, pp. 228, 230Google Scholar.

19 Saltmarsh, John, Wonderfull Predictions Declared In a Message, as from the Lord, To his Excellency Sr. Thomas Fairfax and the Councell of His Army (London, 1648) [29 December 1647], pp. 1–2Google Scholar.

20 The second Part of Englands New Chaines (March 1649)Google Scholar, summarized by Wolfe, Don M., ed., Leveller Manifestoes of the Puritan Revolution (New York, 1944), p. 99Google Scholar.

21 Woolrych, , Soldiers and Statesmen, pp. 298-99Google Scholar; Ingram to Fairfax, 21 December 1647, in Clarke Papers, vol. 2, Camden Society Publications, 2nd ser., 54 (Westminster, 1894), pp. 247-48.

22 A Letter to his Excellencie Sir Thomas Fairfax From Captain Leiutenant Bray (London [3 January] 1647[1648])Google Scholar; Ingram to Fairfax, 23 December 1647, in Lilburne, John, The Peoples Prerogative (London [14 February] 1647[1648]), pp. 54–55Google Scholar.

23 A Declaration Concerning His Majesties Royall Person (London, January 6, 1647[1648]), p. 6Google Scholar; Kingdomes Weekly Intelligencer, No. 241, 28 December–4 January 1647/1648, pp. 788-89Google Scholar; Gentles, , New Model Army, p. 229Google Scholar.

24 Rushworth, , Historical Collections, 7: 951Google Scholar.

25 Heads of Chiefe Passages in Parliament, no. 2, 12-19 January 1647/1648, p. 16Google Scholar; Perfect Diurnall, no. 234, 17-24 January 1647/1648, p. 1982Google Scholar; Rushworth, , Historical Collections, 7: 967Google Scholar; Kingdomes Weekly Intelligencer, no. 244, 18-25 January 1647/1648, pp. 813-15Google Scholar; Wildman, John, Trutlis triumph; or Treachery anatomized (London [1 February] 1647/1648), p. 10Google Scholar.

26 Rushworth, , Historical Collections, 7: 972, 974Google Scholar; Kingdomes Weekly Post, no. 4, 19-26 January 1647/1648, p. 29Google Scholar; A Proclamation Published Through every Regiment of Horse and Foot, and all the Garrisons of the North of England…By Major General! Lambert (London [1 February] 1647[/1648])Google Scholar; Kingdoms Weekly Account of Heads of Chiefe Passages in Parliament, no. 4, 25 January–2 February 1647/1648, p. 31Google Scholar.

27 Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 30, f. 290r.

28 The Displaying of the Life-Guards Colours (London [3 March] 1647/1648), pp. 1–4Google Scholar.

29 McLachlan, H. John, Socinianism in Seventeenth-Century England (London, 1951), pp. 172-77, 263-67Google Scholar.

30 Displaying, p. 2; the Solemn Engagement in A Declaration of the Engagements, Remonstrances, Representations (London [2 October] 1647), pp. 23–27Google Scholar, commonly called the Army's Book of Declarations.

31 An humble Remonstrance from his Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax and the Army under his Command (St. Albans, 23 June 1647)Google Scholar, in A Declaration of the Engagements, p. 66; Displaying, p. 4.

32 Displaying, pp. 3-4.

33 McLachlan, , Socinianism, p. 152Google Scholar.

34 Displaying, p. 5.

35 Kingdomes Weekly Post, no. 8 (16-22 February 1647/1648), p. 57Google Scholar; Gentles, , New Model Army, p. 232Google Scholar, citing SP28/51, fols. 134-36.

36 Displaying, pp. 6-7.

37 Heads of Chiefe Passages in Parliment, no. 8, 16-30 February [i. e. 23 February-1 March] 1647/1648, p. 50Google Scholar. In general, arrears from before the new-modeling were greater than arrears from service after (Gentles, , New Model Army, p. 49Google Scholar).

38 Displaying, p. 1.

39 Displaying, pp. 6-7. This petition, with the faulty date 4 February, was released to the mercuries along with an account of the Lifeguard's reception by the Committee of the Army (Perfect Diurnall, no. 239, 21-28 Feb 1647/1648, p. 1925Google Scholar; Heads of Chief Passages, no. 8, [23] Feb-[1 Mar] 1647/1648, pp. 50–51Google Scholar; Kingdomes Weekly Intelligencer, no. 249, 22-29 Feb 1647/1648, p. 852)Google Scholar.

40 Barret, Robert, The Theorike and Practike of Moderne Warres (London, 1598; Amsterdam, 1968), p. 87Google Scholar.

41 Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 134r.

42 Displaying, p. 7.

43 Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 134v; Perfect Diurnall, no. 239, 21-28 Feb 1647/1648, p. 1925Google Scholar; Displaying, p. 7; Clarke Mss, 2/4. Secretary William Clarke gives Master William Clarke's lodgings as “the Swan on Snowehill.”

44 Displaying, p. 7; Kingdomes Weekly Intelligencer, no. 249, 22-29 Feb 1647/1648, p. 854Google Scholar; Kingdomes Weekly Post, no. 9, 23 Feb-1 Mar 1647/1648, p. 67Google Scholar.

45 Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 134r–v.

46 Displaying, pp. 1, 8; Heads of Chief Passages, no. 8, [23] Feb-[1 Mar] 1647/1648, p. 51Google Scholar.

47 Displaying, p. 10.

48 Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 134v.

49 Clarke Mss, 2/4.

50 Displaying, p. 10.

51 Displaying, pp. 10-11; Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 134v.

52 The Hamilton Papers, ed. Gardiner, Samuel Rawson, Camden Society Publications, 2nd ser., 27 (Westminster, 1880), p. 161Google Scholar; Kingdomes Weekly Post, no. 9, 23 Feb-1 Mar 1647/1648, p. 67Google Scholar; Perfect Occurrences, no. 61, 25 Feb-3 Mar 1647/1648, p. 500Google Scholar; Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 134r–v.

53 Displaying, p. 11.

54 Perfect Occurrences, no. 61, 25 Feb-3 Mar 1647/1648, p. 500Google Scholar.

55 Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 134v.

56 The full text of the Lifeguard's petition is given in Appendix 1.

57 Displaying, p. 13.

58 Clarke Mss, 2/4; Heads of Chief Passages, no. 8, [23] Feb-[1 Mar] 1647/1648, p. 54Google Scholar; Moderate Intelligencer, no. 154, 24 Feb-2 Mar 1647/1648Google Scholar; Perfect Occurrences, no. 61, 25 Feb-3 Mar 1647/1648, p. 501Google Scholar. The text of the substitute petition is given in Appendix 2.

59 On 24 February, while the Lifeguard were being examined about the colors, Fairfax drafted an order appointing most of the Council of War to meet daily at 9 a.m. to receive petitions to the General (Heads of Chief Passages, no. 8, [23] Feb-[1 Mar] 1647/1648, p. 52Google Scholar). Bulstrode Whitelock says that the General was “tired with multiplicity of business and Petitions of London” (Memorials of the English Affairs [London, 1682], p. 293)Google Scholar.

60 Displaying, p. 13.

61 Clarke Mss, 2/4; Gentles, , New Model Army, p. 233Google Scholar; Displaying, p. 13. On Saturday, 4 March, Fairfax pardoned Mallosse and Latham, but left the death sentence on Gethings, who was ultimately spared.

62 Mercurius Aulicus, no. 5, 24 Feb-2 Mar 1647/1648, pp. 2v–3rGoogle Scholar; The Hamilton Papers, ed. Gardiner, , p. 161Google Scholar; Bodleian Library, MS. Clarendon 29, f. 134r-v; Clarke Mss, 2/4; Moderate Intelligencer, no. 154, 24 Feb-2 Mar 1647/1648Google Scholar; Perfect Occurrences, no. 61, 25 Feb-3 Mar 1647/1648, p. 501Google Scholar.

63 In his account of his own case. Bray tells Fairfax that “The Regiment it selfe was naturally inflamed…when they forcibly took a way my Colours from me in my Quarters” (A Representation, to the Nation…, British Library, Thomason, E.422.[27.], 13 Jan 1647/1648, p. 13Google Scholar). According to Thomas Venn, “a greater act of Cowardice cannot be found, than to suffer the Colours to be lost,” and the trooper who “shall recover the lost Ensign and bring it away flying” has earned the cornet's place (Military & Maritine Discipline [London, 1672], p. 183)Google Scholar.

64 Perfect Occurrences, no. 61, 25 Feb-3 Mar 1647/1648, p. 505Google Scholar; Mercurius Aulicus, no. 6, 2-9 Mar 1647/1648. p. F4rGoogle Scholar; Clarke Mss, 4/8 (Chequers MS.782, Library at Chequers Court, Buckinghamshire); Clarke Mss, 2/4.

65 Cf. Woolrych, , Soldiers and Statesmen, p. 58Google Scholar; Levy, Leonard W., Origins of the Fifth Amendment (New York, 1968), p. 274fGoogle Scholar.

66 Elton, , The Compleat Body, p. 181Google Scholar; Davies, Edward, The Art of War, and Englands Traynings (London, 1619; Amsterdam, 1968), p. 120Google Scholar; Barret, , Moderne Warres, p. 21Google Scholar.

67 Gentles, , New Model Army, pp. 232-33, 244-45, 248Google Scholar.