Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:44:19.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Masturbation and Insanity: Henry Maudsley and the Ideology of Sexual Repression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Arthur N. Gilbert
Get access

Extract

Throughout the nineteenth century, auto-eroticism was viewed as a great evil, a threat to the individual and to society. At one time or another, nearly every disease which nineteenth-century doctors could not cure was blamed on self-abuse. Summing up the relationship between masturbation and illness, French doctor Eugene Beckland wrote in 1842, “Many physicians of high authority have maintained that two-thirds of the diseases to which the human race is liable have had their origins in certain solitary practices ….” As to the impact of masturbation on society, Dr. Révéillé Parisé observed in 1828,

In my opinion, neither plague, nor war, nor small pox, nor similar diseases, have produced results so disastrous to humanity as the pernicous habit of onanism. It is the destroying element of civilized societies, which is constantly in action and gradually undermines the health of a nation.

Since 1953, when René Spitz published his important article on the subject, a number of scholars have tried to explain the intense concern with masturbation in the nineteenth century. Spitz argued that the heightened interest in self-abuse reflected the shift to Protestant culture with its emphasis on individual responsibility for sin. More recently, John and Robin Haller used similar arguments to explain it. Other writers such as E. H. Hare and Edward Shorter have argued that one reason why fear of masturbation increased was that people began indulging in the solitary vice to a greater extent than ever before. Men and women were masturbating more—and if they read medical journals on the subject—enjoying it less. Hare speculated that this was because of fear of venereal disease caused by intercourse, a great concern in the nineteenth century. Masturbation was safer. Shorter, who saw masturbation as part of a general increase in sexual appetite, asserted that it was “unlikely that masturbation … was practiced on a wide scale before the premarital sexual revolution.” It is not likely that historians will uncover reliable data on incidence of self-abuse to prove or disprove this hypothesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , Fall 1980 , pp. 268 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Beckland, Eugene M.D.Physiological Mysteries and Revelations in Love, Courtship and Marriage (New York, 1842), p. 97.Google Scholar

2 Quoted in Deslandes, Leopold M.D.A Treatise on the Diseases Produced by Onanism, Masturbation, and Self Pollution and Other Excesses (Boston, 1839), p. 8.Google Scholar The same quotation is in Kellogg, John Harvey M.D., Plain Facts for the Old and Young: Embracing the Natural History and Hygiene of Organic Life (Burlington, Iowa, 1888)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and attributed to Dr. Adam Clarke.

3 Spitz, René A., “Authority and Masturbation,” Yearbook of Psychoanalysis (1953); p. 118.Google Scholar

4 John, and Haller, Robin, The Physician and Sexuality in Victorian America (Urbana Illlinois, 1974), p. 234.Google Scholar

5 Hare, E.H., “Masturbational Insanity: The History of an Idea,” The Journal of Mental Science, 108 (1962): 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Shorter, Edward, The Making of the Modern Family (New York, 1975).Google Scholar

6 Shorter, , The Modern Family, p. 299.Google Scholar

7 Hare, , “Masturbational Insanity,” p. 16.Google Scholar

8 Gilbert, Arthur N., “Doctor, Patient, and Onanist Diseases in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 20 (July, 1975): 217–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Cominos, Peter, “Late Victorian Sexual Responsibility and the Social System,” International Review of Social History, 8 (1963): p. 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Kern, Stephen, “Explosive Intimacy: Psychodymanics o f the Victorian Family,” History of Childhood Quarterly, 1 (Winter, 1974): p. 452.Google Scholar

11 Neuman, R.P., “Masturbation, Madness, and Modern Concepts of Childhood and Adolescence,” Journal of Social History, 8 (Spring, 1975): 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12 Seee Savage's, G. H. obituary on Maudsley, Journal of Mental Science, 64 (April, 1918): 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Other information on Maudsley's, life can be found in The Times obituary (January 25, 1918)Google Scholar; Who Was Who, (1916-1928); Munk, William, Lives of the Fellows of the Royal College of Physicians, 1826-1925, Vol. 4, compiled by G. H. Brown, 4 vols. (London, 1955), p. 172Google Scholar; Mott, F. W., “FRS Maudsley's Obituary,” British Medical Journal (February 2, 1918): p. 161–162Google Scholar; Annual Register (1918) p. 162Google Scholar; and Lancet, 1 (1918): 193–194.Google Scholar

13 Savage, , Journal of Mental Science, p. 118.Google Scholar

14 Ibid, p. 124.

15 Maudsley, , “The Correlations of Mental and Physical Force; or Man a Part of Nature.” Journal of Mental Science, 6 (October, 1859): 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Ibid, p. 60.

17 Maudsley, , “Edgar Allan Poe,” Journal of Men tal Science, 6 (October, 1859): p. 366.Google Scholar

18 Savage, , Journal of Mental Science, p. 119.Google Scholar

19 Ibid, and Mott, , British Medical Journal, p. 161.Google Scholar

20 Maudsley, , The Pathology of Mind (New York, 1880), p. 459.Google Scholar

21 Acton, William, The Functions and Disorders of the Reproductive Organs in Childhood, Youth, Adult Age and Advanced Age (Philadelphia, 1865), p. 57.Google Scholar

22 On Bemiss tee Napheys, George H. M.D., The Transmission of Life Counsels On the Nature and Hygiene of the Masculine Function (Philadelphia, 1872), p. 92Google Scholar; Holick, Frederick, The Male Generative Organs In Health and Disease from Infancy to Old Age (New York, 1849), p. 347.Google Scholar

23 For example, see Howe, S. G., On the Causes of Idiocy (reprinted, New York, 1972)Google Scholar,

24 The Journal of Mental Science, 35 (1888): p. 162.Google Scholar

25 Ibid.

26 Ibid.

27 Ibid.

28 Maudsley, , The Pathology of Mind, p. 100.Google Scholar

29 Maudsley, , Responsibility in Mental Disease (New York, 1900) p. 21.Google Scholar

30 Maudsley, , Th Pathology of Mind, pp. 130–131.Google Scholar

31 Ibid, p. 46.

32 Maudsley, , “Delusions,” Journalof Mental Science, 9 (1863): 21.Google Scholar

33 Maudsley, , The Pathology of Mind, pp. 23, 298, 345.Google Scholar

34 Maudsley, , “Edgar Alkn Poe,” Journal of Mental Science, 6 (1859–1860): 356.Google Scholar

35 Ibid, p. 344.

36 Maudsley, , “Emanuel Swedenborg,” Journal of Mental Science, 15 (1869): p. 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Maudsley, , “On Love of Life,” Journal of Mental Science, 7 (1860): 208.Google Scholar

38 Maudsley, , The Pathology of Mind, p. 243.Google Scholar

39 Maudsley, , “Insanity and Its Treatment,” Address at the Annual General Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association, 3 August, 1871, Royal College of Physicians, in Journal of Mental Science, 17 (1871): p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40 Maudsley, , “On Some of the Causes of Insanity,” Journal of Mental Science, 12 (1867): p. 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 Maudsley, , The Pathology of Mind, pp. 452–53.Google Scholar

42 See Maudsley's unflattering discussion of Simon Stylites in “Delusions,” Journal of Mental Science, p. 18.Google Scholar

43 Quoted in Marcus, Steven, The Other Victorians (New York, 1964), p. 20.Google Scholar Acton, however did stress evils other than the solitary nature of the act. He showed far greater concern with the impact of masturbation on children than did Maudsley. He also stressed that masturbation ruined men for sexual activity in marriage and most importantly, referred to the physical dangers of spending sperm in a profligate manner. Acton's work gives credence to many of the current theories about masturbation phobia in the nineteenth century. At the very least, this study of Maudsley shows that an in-depth analysis of many writers on onanism is necessary before any final conclusion on fear of self abuse can be reached.

44 Jackson, James, The Sexual Organism and its Healthful Management (Boston, 1862), p. 60.Google Scholar

45 Rosenberg, Charles, “Sexuality, Class and Role in 19th Century America,” American Quarterly, 25 (May, 1973): 152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

46 Hare, , “Masturbational Insanity,” p. 12.Google Scholar

47 Douglas, Mary, Natural Symbols: Explanations in Cosmology (New York, 1970), p. 70.Google Scholar

48 Altick, Richard, Victorian People and Ideas (New York, 1973), p. 77.Google Scholar

49 Houghton, Walter E., The Victorian Frame of Mind, 1830–1870 (New Haven, 1957), pp. 1, 77.Google Scholar

50 Carlyle, Thomas, Past and Present (New York, 1927), p. 296Google Scholar; and Maudsley, , “Emanuel Swedenborg,” Journal of Mental Science, p. 186.Google Scholar

51 Gruber, Howard E., Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity (New York, 1964), p. 54.Google Scholar

52 On Huxley's pessimism see Irvine, WilliamApes, Angels, and Victorians (New York, 1955), p. 425.Google Scholar

53 Huxley, T. H., Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays, (New York, 1903), p. 83.Google Scholar

54 Maudsley, , “Delusions,” Journal of Mental Science, p. 22.Google Scholar

55 See Andreski, Stanislaw, ed., Herbert Spencer: Structure, Function, and Evolution (London, 1971)Google Scholar, and Carniero, Robert L., Herbert Spencer: The Evolution of Society (Chicago, 1967).Google Scholar

56 Spencer, Herbert, “A Theory of Population Deduced from the General Law of Animal fertility,” The Westminister Review, n.s. 1 (1852): pp. 485–86.Google Scholar

57 Himmelfarb, Gertrude, Victorian Minds (New York, 1968), p. 309.Google Scholar

58 Maudsley, , “Delusions,” Journal of Mental Science, p. 23.Google Scholar