Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:21:58.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics and Prophecy in Seventeenth-Century England: The Case of Elizabeth Poole

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2017

Manfred Brod
Get access

Extract

Elizabeth Poole, “the Abingdon prophetess,” makes a brief appearance, often as a footnote, in several standard political histories of the seventeenth century. However, only two attempts seem to have been made to evaluate fully her significance in the politics and religion of the period, one by Professor Firth in his edition of the Clarke Papers and one by the American scholar Dorothy Ludlow in a thesis published in 1978. Firth’s attempt was uncharacteristically superficial, and he limited himself to retailing Royalist propaganda on the subject; while Ludlow, although she brought together much of the available information, was more concerned with Poole as a woman than as a political activist. This article attempts to put her life and public activities into a wider context. It argues that her example shows that it was not impossible for women of the time to function at the highest political levels. What was significant about Poole was her failure to achieve political aims that were not in themselves unrealistic or lacking in influential support. Finally, this article postulates that female political activity at the decision-making levels was limited to a mode that could support or oppose general political strategies but was ill-suited to the furtherance of specific policies or actions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , Fall 1999 , pp. 395 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Dr. Clive Holmes and to an anonymous referee for commenting on earlier versions of this paper.

References

1 Underdown, David, Pride’s Purge: Politics in the Puritan Revolution (London 1971) p. 183;Google Scholar Woolrych, Austin, Commonwealth to Protectorate (Oxford 1982) p. 242;Google Scholar Manning, Brian, 1649, The Crisis of the English Revolution (London, 1992), p. 140, among others.Google Scholar

2 Firth, C. H., éd., The Clarke Papers, 2 vols. (Camden Society, 1894) 2: xix-xxii, 150-54, 163-65;Google Scholar Ludlow, Dorothy, “Arise and Be Doing; English ‘Preaching’ Women 1640-1660” (Ph.D. diss., Indiana University, 1978).Google Scholar

3 International Genealogical Index. Although this is far from conclusive, no other entries of an Elizabeth Poole, daughter of a Robert, of approximately the right date of birth have been found for London, nor for the various other counties from which she might seem likely to have originated. A Robert Poole was reported in 1638 living at the West End of St. Paul’s, where he paid £20 per year in rent, about average for the district. ( Dale, T. C., The Inhabitants of London in 1638, 2vols. [London, 1931] 1: 65)Google Scholar.

4 Kiffen, William, A Brief Remonstrance&or, certain queries&propounded by Mr. Robert Poole&. (London, 1645) (Thomason E293.31).Google Scholar

5 Tolmie, Murray, The Triumph of the Saints, The separate churches of London, 1616-1649 (Cambridge, 1977), pp. 192-95.Google Scholar

6 Underhill, E. B., éd., Confessions of Faith (London, 1854), pp. 11ff.Google Scholar

7 Edwards, Thomas, Gangraena (London, 1645), Rota Reprint, 1977, 1: 55 (note inconsistent page numbering).Google Scholar

8 Tolmie, Murray, The Triumph of the Saints, pp. 55-56.Google Scholar

9 White, B. R., ed., Association Records of the Particular Baptists&to 1660 (London, 1974), passim.Google Scholar

10 White, B. R., “John Pendarves, the Calvinistic Baptists and the Fifth Monarchy,” Baptist Quarterly 25 (1974): 251-71.Google Scholar

11 Poole, E., An Alarum of War (London, 1649), p. 9 (Thomason E 555.23).Google Scholar

12 Evidence presented at Daniel Axtell’s trial as a regicide in 1660 describes a high level meeting in Ireton’s quarters on the morning of the king’s execution, with Ireton and Harrison both still in bed ( Howell, T. B., ed., Cobbett’s complete collection of state trials&, 33 vols. (London, 1809), 5: 1148).Google Scholar

13 Firth, The Clarke Papers, 2: 150-54, 163-65.

14 Speech to Parliament, 19 March 1604, printed in Tanner, J. R., Constitutional Documents of the Reign of James I (Cambridge, 1930), p. 36;Google Scholar Underdown, David, A Freeborn People (Oxford, 1996), pp. 12-14Google Scholar, 137n 33; Amussen, Susan Dwyer, An Ordered Society: Gender and Class in Early Modern England (Oxford, 1988), pp. 1-2, 61-62.Google Scholar

15 Poole, E., A Vision (London, 1649) (Thomason E537.24).Google Scholar

16 Pendarves, Thomasine, in Alarum, p. 10,Google Scholar couples Harrison with an otherwise unknown “Colonel Reeth.” It seems reasonable to assume that this is an error for Nathaniel Rich, Harrison’s close friend and associate, who had been prominent in the Council’s examination of Poole.

17 Poole, E., An Alarum of War (London, 1649) (Thomason E 555.23),Google Scholar coupled with Another Alarum of War (E555.24).

18 Severall Proceedings, No. 199, 14 to 21 July 1653, p. 3149 (Thomason E217.2); The Faithful Post No. 122, 19 to 26 July 1653, p. 1096 (E217.7); The Dutch Diurnal, No. 20, 19 to 26 July 1653, p. 11 (E707.6); Weekly Intelligencer, 19 to 26 July 1653, p. 930, (E707.7); Bodleian, Clarendon Mss 46, Folios 110, 113. Thurloe, John, A collection of the state papers of John Thurloe&, 1 vols. (London, 1742) 1: 367-68Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Thurloe State Papers).

19 I am indebted to Mr. Peter Daniels, Assistant Librarian of the Religious Society of Friends, for searching the records at a time when they were closed to the public.

20 Calendar of State Papers Domestic, 1667-68, pp. 363, 369. The Mint in Southwark was demolished in 1557 and the area has been described as “a recognised sanctuary for thieves and debtors till the early eighteenth century” ( Hibbert, Christopher, ed., The Encyclopedia of London [London, 1983], p. 521)Google Scholar.

21 Gardiner, S. R., History of the Great Civil War 1642-1649, 4 vols. (London, 1894), 4: 281-84;Google Scholar Ramsey, Robert W., Henry Ireton (London, 1949) pp. 139-40;Google Scholar Carte, Thomas, A Collection of original letters and papers&Found among the Duke of Ormonde’s papers, 2 vols. (London, 1739), 2: 202.Google Scholar

22 Firth, The Clarke Papers, 1: xx.

23 Ibid., 2: xxii; Anon, The English Devil, or Cromwell and His Monstrous Witch Discover’d at Whitehall (London, 1660) (Thomason E1035.3).

24 Mercurius Pragmaticus, nos 40-41, 26 Dec. 1648-49, Jan. 1649, under Friday Dec. 29 (Thomason E537.20).

25 One possibility for Poole’s introduction to army Levellers was in June 1647, when mutinous troops of Rainsborough’s regiment entered Abingdon and stayed there after being restored to obedience. John Pendarves was appointed their chaplain. Rainsborough himself was killed in the 1648 fighting ( Firth, C. H., The Regimental History of Cromwell’s Army, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1940), 2: 420;Google Scholar Lawrence, Ann, Parliamentary Army Chaplains, 1642-1651 (London, 1990, p. 58).Google Scholar

26 A Plea for Common Right and Freedom (London, 28 December 1648) (Thomason E536.22).

27 Lilburne, John, Legal Fundamental Liberties (London, 1649) p. 32ff.Google Scholar

28 Moderate Intelligencer, No. 198, Dec. 28, 1648-Jan. 4, 1649, p. 1814 (Thomason E537.3).

29 Firth, The Clarke Papers, 2: 178-83.

30 Ibid. p. 259.

31 Lilburne, Legal Fundamental Liberties, p. 29.

32 Gardiner, History of the Great Civil War, 4: 282, 284; Wedgwood, C. V., The Trial of Charles I (London, 1964), p. 105.Google Scholar

33 Petition to General Fairfax, 7 November 1648 (Thomason E474.5). But his fellow-millenarian, William Erbury, didn’t much care so long as the king’s political power was abolished (Firth, The Clarke Papers, 2: 178).

34 Remonstrance of the Army, 16 November 1648 (Thomason E473.il), pp. 62-63.

35 Firth, The Clarke Papers, 2: 169.

36 Gentles, Ian, The New Model Army (Oxford, 1992), p. 301.Google Scholar

37 Wedgwood, The Trial of Charles I, p. 130.

38 Tolmie, Murray, The Triumph of the Saints, p. 171.Google Scholar

39 Morrill, J. S., “John Lilburne,” in Greaves, Richard L. and Zaller, Robert, eds., Biographical Dictionary of British Radicals in the Seventeenth Century, 3 vols. (London, 1982), 2: 87Google Scholar; Tolmie, , The Triumph of the Saints, pp. 152-53, 188-89.Google Scholar

40 Tolmie, The Triumph of the Saints, pp. 181-84.

41 Blair Worden, “Providence and Politics in Cromwellian England,” Past & Present 109 (1989): 55-99.

42 Cromwell to Col. Robert Hammond, 25 November 1648 ( Lomas, S. C., ed., Letters and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell [London, 1904], 1: 393)Google Scholar.

43 Remonstrance of the Army, 20 November 1648, p. 7 (Thomason E473.3); Petitions Presented to his Excellency the Lord Fairfax, 30 November 1648, pp. 2, 4 (E474.5); Berkshire Petition, 30 November 1648, p. 3 (E475.2).

44 Worden, Blair, “Providence and Politics in Cromwellian England,” p. 94.Google Scholar

45 For a description of the making of strategy before the battle of Dunbar, see Cromwell’s letter to William Lenthall of 4 September 1650 (Lomas, Letters and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell, 2: 102).

46 Firth, The Clarke Papers, 1: 282.

47 Mack, Phyllis, “Feminine behaviour and radical action: Franciscans, Quakers, and followers oí Gandhi,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11 (1986): 457-77.Google Scholar

48 Higgins, Patricia, “The reactions of women, with special reference to women petitioners,” in ferian Manning, ed., Politics, Religion, and the English Civil War (London, 1973);Google Scholar The Kingdom’s Weekly Intelligencer, 8-15 August 1643, pp. 229-39 (Thomason E65.11).

49 Cohen, Alfred, “Prophecy and Madness: Women Visio naries during the Puritan Revolution,” Journal of Psychohistory 11 (1984): 411-30.Google Scholar

50 Mack, Phyllis, “Women as prophets during the English Civil War,” Feminist Studies 8 (1982): 19-45.Google Scholar

51 Fox, George, The Woman learning in Silence (London, 1656), passim.Google Scholar

52 Poole, Elizabeth, Vision, p. 1; “To the pretended Church and Fellowship of the Saints in London,” in An Alarum of War.Google Scholar

53 Firth, The Clarke Papers, 2: 152.

54 Greaves, Richard L., Enemies under his Feet (Stanford, 1990), pp. 174ff.Google Scholar

55 Thurloe State Papers, 6: 186-87.

56 Higgins, Patricia, “The reactions of women, with special reference to women petitioners.”Google Scholar

57 Gentles, Ian, “London Levellers—the Chidley s and their Circle,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 29 (1978): 281-309.Google Scholar

58 Gregg, Pauline, Free-born John (London, 1961), p. 152Google Scholar; Overton, Richard, An Appeale (1647)Google Scholar, repr. in Wolfe, D. M., Leveller Manifestoes of the Puritan Revolution (New York, 1944), pp. 164-66;Google Scholar Lilburne, John, The just defence of John Lilburn (1653)Google Scholar, repr. in Haller, W. and Davies, G., eds., The Leveller Tracts 1647-1653 (New York, 1944), p. 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 Hill, Christopher, “Arise Evans: Welshman in London,”Google Scholar in Hill, C., Change and Continuity in Seventeenth-Century England, (rev. ed.; London, 1991);Google Scholar Fuller, Thomas, History of the Worthies of England (London, 1662), pt. 3: 212;Google Scholar Dictionary of National Biography sub John Saltmarsh; Nuttall, Geoffrey F, James Nayler, A Fresh Approach (London, 1954)Google Scholar.