Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:32:21.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religious Toleration and its Enemies: The Independent Divines and the Issue of Toleration during the English Civil War*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Avihu Zakai
Get access

Extract

“Patterns sanctified by great historiographic traditions,” wrote J. H. Hexter, “tend to become fixed. Frequently these patterns are neither logical nor coherent, but the sanction of use and wont behind them is so powerful that researchers tend to force new materials into the time-honored model.” This contention is nowhere more manifest than in the historiography of the Puritan Revolution, where studies of religious developments and struggles during the English Civil War indeed reveal a “time honored model” and tend to convey an almost univocal argument concerning the Independents and the rise of the idea of religious toleration. “As early as 1643,” wrote one expert on the issue of toleration, “when the English Parliament was obliged to ally with the Scots in the Solemn League and Covenant … the issue of toleration came to the fore.” Consequently, because “the Presbyterian Scots wished to impose their Calvinist order on England, against the opposition on the parliamentary side of a core of Independents led by Oliver Cromwell and Sir Henry Vane the Younger,” the Independents “became the leading opponents of Presbyterianism and supporters of a general toleration.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , Spring 1989 , pp. 1 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study was supported in part by an American Philosophical Society Research Grant, and an American Studies Fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies. An earlier version of this essay was presented to Professor J. G. A. Pocock's Seminar on “English Historical Thought,” The Johns Hopkins University, 1980. I am grateful to Professors Pocock, John R. Pankratz, and to anonymous readers for Albion, for their valuable comments and insights in preparing this essay for publication.

References

1 Hexter, J. H., “The Problem of the Presbyterian Independents,” Reappraisals in History (London, 1961), p. 163.Google Scholar

2 Kamen, Henry, The Rise of Toleration (New York, 1967), p. 170.Google Scholar

3 Ashton, Robert, The English Civil War, Conservatism and Revolution, 1603–1649 (London, 1978), p. 218.Google Scholar

4 Hart, A. Tindal, Clergy and Society, 1600–1800 (London, 1968), pp. 40–41.Google Scholar

5 Zagorin, Perez, Rebels and Rulers, 1500–1660, vol. 2, Provincial Rebellion, Revolutionary Civil Wars (London, 1982), p. 162.Google Scholar

6 Williams, Roger, The Bloody Tenent of Persecution, for Cause of Conscience, in Caldwell, S. L., ed., The Complete Writings of Roger Williams, 7 vols. (New York, 1963), 3: 349–351, 355–356.Google Scholar

7 Williams, C. M., “The Anatomy of a Radical Gentleman, Henry Marten,” in Puritans and Rev¬olutionaries, Pennington, D. and Thomas, K., eds. (Oxford, 1978), p. 125.Google Scholar

8 Hill, Christopher, The Experience of Defeat: Milton and Some Contemporaries (New York, 1984), p. 179.Google Scholar

9 Goodwin, Thomas, The Great Interest of States and Kingdomes (1645), p. 53Google Scholar. See also Walker, David, “Thomas Goodwin and the Debate on Church Government,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 34, no. 1, (January 1983): 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Butterfield, Herbert, “Toleration in Early Modern Times,” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (Oct.-Dec. 1977): 573CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See Also Newman, Jay, Foundations of Religious Tolerance (Toronto, 1982).Google Scholar

11 Lecler, Joseph, Toleration and Reformation, 2 vols. (New York, 1960), 2: 456.Google Scholar

12 Jordan, W. K., The Development of Religious Toleration, 4 vols. (London, 1932–1940), 3: 369–370.Google Scholar

13 Aston, , The English Civil War, p. 218.Google Scholar

14 Sirluck, Ernest, “Introduction,” Complete Prose Works of John Milton, 8 vols. (New Haven, 1953–1982), 2: 74, 107.Google Scholar

15 Yule, George, The Independents in the English Civil War (Cambridge, 1958), pp. 45, 13.Google Scholar

16 Miller, Perry, Orthodoxy in Massachusetts> (Gloucester, 1965), pp. 280–281.Google Scholar

17 On the controversy that follows Yule's attempt to find correlation between religion and politics, (The Independents in the English Civil War, p. 1), see: Underdown, David, “The Independents Reconsidered,” The Journal of British Studies 3 (1965): 57–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yule's, reply “Independents and Revolutionaries,” The Journal of British Studies 7 (1968): 11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Underdown replied to this in “The Independents Again,” The Journal of British Studies 8 (1968): 83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Foster, Stephen, “The Presbyterian Independents Exorcized,” Past and Present 44 (August 1969): 52–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For recent studies of Independents and Presbyterians, see Bradley, Rosemary D., “The Failure of Accommodation: Religious Conflicts between Presbyterians and Independents in the Westminster Assembly, 1643–1646,” Journal of Religious History 12, no. 1 (June 1982): 23–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “‘Jacob and Esau Struggling in the Wombe:’ A Study of Presbyterian and Independent Religious Conflicts 1640–48” (Ph.D. thesis, University of Kent, 1975)Google Scholar; Graham, J. K., “‘Independent’ and ‘Presbyterian’: A Study of Religious and Political Language and the Politics of Words during the English Civil War, c. 1640–1660” (Ph.D. diss., Washington University, 1978).Google Scholar

18 Goodwin, Thomas, Nye, Philip, Simpson, Sidrach, Burroughes, Jeremiah, and Bridge, William, An Apologetical Narration, Humbly Submitted to the Honourable Houses of Parliament, London, January 3, 1644, p. 28Google Scholar. Lord Say and Sele, cited by Kirby, E. W., “The English Presbyterians in the Westminster Assembly,” Church History 3 (1964): 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Ibid., p. 419.

20 Ibid., pp. 423, 424, 423.

21 Walwyn, William, A Help to the Right Understanding of a Discourse Concerning Independency (1645), p. 6Google Scholar. See also, A Short Answer to some Objections against the Practices of those who are called Independents (1644), pp. 1–6Google Scholar; Baillie, Robert, The Dissuasive from the Errors of the Time, Vindicated from the Exceptions of Mr. Cotton (1654), p. 12Google Scholar; Rose, Alexander, A View of all Religions in the World (1655), pp. 389–94Google Scholar; Owen, John, A Defence of Mr. John Cotton (1658), pp. 22–25.Google Scholar

22 Baillie, Robert, A Dissuasive from the Errors of the Time, cited by Yule, The Independents in the English Civil War, p. 10.Google Scholar

23 Ibid., p. 10. In addition to these three Independents' manifestos, I have used the following tracts relating to the Independents: Forbes, Alexander, An Anatomy of Independency (1644)Google Scholar; Simpson, Sidrach, The Anatomist Anatomised (1644)Google Scholar; Dury, John, An Epistolary Discourse … whether the State should tolerate the Independent Government … Written by Mr. John Dury to Mr. Tho. Goodwin, Mr. Philip Nye, Mr. Samuel Hartlib (1644)Google Scholar; An Answer to Mr. John Dury (1644); The Reasons Presented by the Dissenting Brethren Against Certain Propositions Concerning Presbyterial Government (1648); The Papers and Answers of the Dissenting Brethren and the Committee of the Assembly of Divines (1648); Papers given to the Honorable Committee … For Accommodation (1648, [1644]); The Principles of Faith, Presented by Mr. Tho. Goodwin, Mr. Nye … (1654); Declaration of the Faith and Order Owned and Practised in the Congregational Churches in England (1659).

24 Jordan, , The Development of Religious Toleration, 3: 51.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., p. 371.

26 Liu, Tai, Discord in Sion: The Puritan Divines and the Puritan Revolution, 1640–1660 (The Hague, 1973), p. 35Google Scholar. For the dimensions of apocalyptic visions and millenarian expectations before and during the Civil War, see: Haller, William, The Rise of Puritanism (Philadelphia, 1972)Google Scholar, Liberty and Reformation in the Puritan Revolution (New York, 1955)Google Scholar, and Foxe's Book of Martyrs and the Elect Nation (London, 1963)Google Scholar; Hill, Christopher, The World Turned Upside Down (New York, 1980)Google Scholar; Lamont, William M., Godly Rule, Politics and Religion, 1603–1660 (London, 1969)Google Scholar, and “Puritanism as History and Historiography,” Past and Present 44 (August 1969):133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pocock, J. G. A., “England,” in National Consciences, History and Political Culture, in Early Modern Europe, Ranum, O., ed. (Baltimore, 1975): 98–117Google Scholar, and “Time, History and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes,” in Politics, Language and Time (New York, 1973): 148–201Google Scholar. See also my essay, “Reformation, History, and Eschatology in English Protestantism,” History and Theory 26, no. 3 (October 1987): 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Liu, , Discord in Sion, p. 38.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., p. 38.

29 An Apologetica! Narration, p. 26.

30 Bridge, William, Babylons Downfall (1641)Google Scholar, cited by Kirby, , “Sermons before the Commons, 1640–1642,” American Historical Review 44 (1938–1939): 536Google Scholar. See also, Trevor-Roper, H. R., “The Fast Sermons of the Long Parliament,” in Essays in British History (New York, 1964): 85–138.Google Scholar

31 Burton, Henry, England's Bondage and Hope of Deliverance (1641)Google Scholar, cited by Kirby, , “Sermons before the Commons,” p. 536Google Scholar. See also, Burroughes, Jeremiah, Moses His Choice (1641)Google Scholar; and The Humble Petition of the Ministers of the Church of England (1641).

32 Lamont, , Godly Rule, p. 83Google Scholar. For Independent clergy's attitudes toward Parliament's actions concerning church reform, see Goodwin, Thomas, Zerubbabels Encouragement to Finish the Temple (1642), p. 2Google Scholar: “I took the boldness to urge and encourage you to Church Reformation”; Simpson, Sidrach, Reformations' Preservation (1643), pp. 3, 5Google Scholar: “All the wellaffected in the Kingdom cry unto you … Help us: … Save us, for we are Sinking; Sinking in our estates, our Liberties, our Religion.” “Every one may reform himself, but you only can the Nation, of those eviles, and unless those be removed, Actum Est De Religione.”

33 An Apologetical Narration, pp. 25–26.

34 Nye, and Calamy, cited by Liu, , Discord in Sion, p. 9.Google Scholar

35 Kaplan, Lawrence, “Presbyterians and Independents in 1643,” English Historical Review 84 (April 1969): 247–48.Google Scholar

36 Baillie, Robert, cited by Liu, , Discord in Sion, p. 9.Google Scholar

37 Haller, William, Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution, 1638–1647, 3 vols. (New York, 1934): 1: 36.Google Scholar

38 An Apologetical Narration, p. 26.

39 Certain Considerations to Diswade Men from Further Gathring of Churches in this Present Junction of Time (London, 1643), p. 5.Google Scholar

40 Haller, William, Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution, 1: 49.Google Scholar

41 Liu, , Discord in Sion, p. 40.Google Scholar

42 Haller, , Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution, 1: 35.Google Scholar

43 Liu, , Discord in Sion, p. 39.Google Scholar

44 Ibid., p. 41.

45 Kaplan, , “Presbyterians and Independents in 1643,” p. 254Google Scholar. See also the Presbyterian ministers of London's petition, “To the Honourable the Commons House of Parliament,” Mercurius Civicus, no. 69 (September 11–19, 1644), p. 653Google Scholar, and “A Letter of the Presbyterian Ministers in the City of London … to the Reverend Assembly of Divines,” January 1645, in Assheton, William, Toleration Disapproved and Condemned (1670), pp. 56–59.Google Scholar

46 Certaine Consideration, pp. 1–2; Liu, , Discord in Sion, p. 40.Google Scholar

47 An Apologetical Narration, p. 21.

48 Liu, , Discord in Sion, p. 45.Google Scholar

49 Jordan, , The Development of Religious Toleration, 3: 355, n. 1Google Scholar; Cotton, John, The Way of Congregational Churches Cleared (1648), in John Cotton on the Churches of New England, ed. Ziff, Larzer (Cambridge, Mass., 1968), p. 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Cotton wrote this book against Baillie's A Dissuasive from the Errours of the Time.

50 Kaplan, , “Presbyterians and Independents in 1643,” p. 253.Google Scholar

51 Jordan, , The Development of Religious Toleration, 3: 50–53.Google Scholar

52 An Apologetical Narration, pp.7, 21, 23–24. For the controversy caused by the publication of the “Apology,” see, for example, Edwards, Thomas, Antapologica: or, A Full Answer to the Apologetical Narration (1644)Google Scholar; Goodwin, John (?), The Inexcusableness ofthat Grand Accusation of the Bretheren, called Antapologia (1644)Google Scholar; A Short Letter … Upon Mr. Edwards his Booke, he calleth Anti-Apologie (1644); A Short Answer to some Objections … Against those who are called Independents (1644); Chidley, Kathrine, A New Yeares Gift, or a Brief Exhortation to Mr. Thomas Edwards (1644)Google Scholar; Stewart, Adam, An Answer to a Libell Intituled, A Coole Conference Between the cleered Reformation and the Apologetical Narration (1644)Google Scholar; Goodwin, John, A Short Answer to A. S. alias Adam Stewart (1644)Google Scholar; A Reply … to A. S. [Adam Stewart] … upon the Apologetical Narration (1644); M. S. to A. 5., [upon] the Apologetica! Narration (1644), and A Reply … Upon the Apologetica! Narration (1644); The Saints Apologie, or a Vindication of the Churches … from the odious names of Brownists and Separatists (1644); A Letter from a Person of Honour, Reconciling the Dissenting Bretheren … and the Presbyterians (1644); Unity Our Duty … Humbly presented to the Godly … Brethren, commonly called Independent (1644); Inquiries Into the causes of our miseries … [and] A Just vindication of the Way of worship very commonly misunderstood, very falsly interpreted, but very truly called Independent (1644).

53 Nye, Philip, cited by Nobbs, D., “Philip Nye on Church and State,” Cambridge Historical Journal 5–6 (1935–1940): 55.Google Scholar

54 Baillie, Robert, cited by Yule, The Independents in the English Civil War, p. 12.Google Scholar

55 Nye, , cited by Nobbs, , “Philip Nye on Church and State,” p. 55.Google Scholar

56 Cotton, John, The Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven (1644), in John Cotton on the Churches of New England, Ziff, L., ed. (Cambridge, Mass., 1968), p. 153.Google Scholar

57 The Separatists denounced the Church of England and its ministers as Antichristian. See, for example, Burrage, Champlin, The Early Dissenters, 2 vols. (New York, 1912 [1967]), 1: 186Google Scholar: Describing the formation of the separatist church in Gloucester, one separatist said, “They had left the Church of England as having an Antichristian Ministry, worship, confusion, &c…”

58 An Apologelical Narration, p. 6.

59 An Apologetical Narration, pp. 23–24; 4, 29.

60 An Apologetical Narration, Charles Herele's “Preface.”

61 Walwyn, William, The Compassionate Samaritane, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar

62 Walwyn, William, The Power of Love (1643), preface “To the Reader,” p. 20.Google Scholar

63 Walwyn, The Compassionate Samaritane, preface “To the Commons of England.” Walwyn here, as other sectarian writers in this time, used the word “Independent” freely to describe those who adopted the principle of free gathering of church and its independency in relation to ecclesiastical order, or a national church. Thus, Walwyn, John Goodwin, and others, put under the name of “Independents” Anabaptists, Separatists and other sects. Contemporaries, not only sectarians, used the name “Independents” as inclusive name for many sects, and it was the aim of the Independents divines to dissociate themselves and their “Independency” from the radical notion of Independency, concerning religion, that the sects claimed. See, for example, that the name “Independents” was an inclusive name describing many sects, Walwyn, William, A Help to the Right Understanding of A Discourse Concerning Independency (1645), p. 6Google Scholar: “for all sorts of Independents, whether Anabaptists or Brownists, or Antinomians, or any other. …”

64 Goodwin, John, O eomaxia, or the Grand Imprudence of Men Running the Hazard of Fighting Against God (1644), p. 11.Google ScholarPubMed

65 Walwyn, , The Compassionate Samaritane, p. 72.Google Scholar

66 Robinson, Henry, Liberty of Conscience (1644), p. 27.Google Scholar

67 Williams, C. M., “The Anatomy of a Radical Gentlemen—Henry Marten,” p. 125.Google Scholar

68 An Apologelical Narration, pp. 15–16, 28.

69 Robinson, Henry, Liberty of Conscience, p. 44.Google Scholar

70 Goodwin, Thomas and Nye, Philip, “Introduction” to John Cotton's book, The Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, p. 77.Google Scholar

71 Overton, Richard, The Araignement of Mr. Persecution (1645), p. 19.Google Scholar

72 Cotton, John, The Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, p. 153.Google Scholar

73 Nye, Philip, cited by Nobbs, “Philip Nye on Church and State,” p. 55.Google Scholar

74 Williams, Roger, The Bloody Tenent of Persecution (1644), in A. S. P. Woodhouse, Puritanism and Liberty (Chicago, 1978 [1938]), pp. 286–287.Google Scholar

75 Williams, , The Bloody Tenent of Persecution, p. 289, 281.Google Scholar

76 Haller, William, The Rise of Puritanism (Philadelphia, 1972), p. 174.Google Scholar

77 Pearson, Samuel C. Jr., “Reluctant Radicals: The Independents at the Westminster Assembly,” Journal of Church and State 11 (1969): 484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

78 Walwyn, , A Help to the Right Understanding of a Discourse Concerning Independency, p. 7.Google Scholar

79 Jordan, , The Development of Religious Toleration, 3: 65–66.Google Scholar

80 Pearson, , “Reluctant Radicals,” p. 483.Google Scholar

81 Kishlansky, Mark A., The Rise of the New Model Army (London, 1979), p. 72.Google Scholar

82 Ibid., p. 290.

83 Shaw, William A., A History of the English Church During the Civil Wars and the Commonwealth. 1640–1660, 2 vols. (London, 1900), 2: 39.Google Scholar

84 Robert Baillie, cited in ibid., 2: 45.

85 Burroughes, Jeremiah, A Sermon Preached Before the Right Honourable the House of Peeres (1645), pp. 45, 48.Google Scholar

86 Caryl, Joseph, The Arraignment of Unbelief as the Grand Cause of Our National Nonestablishment (1645), pp. 2, 47Google Scholar. On the general issue of unbelief and Puritans' attitude toward it in the seventeenth century see: Aylmer, G. A., “Unbelief in Seventeenth Century England,” in Puritans and Revolutionaries, Pennington, D. and Thomas, K., eds., pp. 22–46.Google Scholar

87 Caryl, Joseph, The Arraignment of Unbelief, p. 48.Google Scholar

88 Kishlansky, , The Rise of the New Model Army, p. 45.Google Scholar

89 Baxter, Richard, cited by Nuttall, G. F., Richard Baxter (London, 1965), pp. 36–37.Google Scholar

90 Pearson, , “Reluctant Radicals,” p. 476.Google Scholar

91 Kirby, , “The English Presbyterians in the Westminster Assembly,” p. 421.Google Scholar

92 Burroughes, A Sermon Preached Before the … House of Peeres, “The Epistle.”

93 Kirby, , “The English Presbyterians in the Westminster Assembly,” p. 426Google Scholar. Neal, Daniel, The History of the Puritans, 2 vols. (New York, 1844), 2: 18.Google Scholar

94 Burroughes, , A Sermon Preached Before … the House of Peeres, pp. 45–48.Google Scholar

95 Caryl, Joseph, Heaven and Earth Embracing, p. 10Google Scholar. Burroughes, Jeremiah, A Sermon Preached Before the … House of Peeres, p. 44.Google Scholar

96 The Ancient Bounds, in Woodhouse, , Puritanism and Liberty, pp. 250–51.Google Scholar

97 Yule, , The Independents in the English Civil War, p. 26.Google Scholar

98 The Ancient Bounds, pp. 250–51.

99 Woodhouse, , Puritanism and Liberty, p. 35.Google Scholar

100 The Ancient Bounds, p. 248.

101 The Ancient Bounds, p. 252.

102 Nye, Philip, cited by Nobbs, , “Philip Nye on Church and State,” p. 55.Google Scholar

103 The Ancient Bounds, p. 254.

104 The Ancient Bounds, p. 252.

105 Goodwin, Thomas, The Great Interest of States and Kingdomes (1645), p. 53.Google Scholar

106 Caryl, Joseph, England Plus Ultra (1645), pp. 24–25.Google Scholar

107 Baillie, Robert, Letters and Journal, ed., Laing, D., 3 vols. (Edinburgh, 1841–1842), 2: 229.Google Scholar

108 Kirby, , “The English Presbyterians in the Westminster Assembly,” p. 422.Google Scholar

109 These arguments are based on an examination of the following Independents divines' sermons from 1646 to 1648; Caryl, Joseph, Joy Out-Joyed (1646)Google Scholar; Goodwin, Thomas, The Great Interest of States and Kingdomes (1646)Google Scholar; Caryl, England Plus Ultra; Jeremiah Burroughes, A Sermon; Peter, Hugh, Gods Doing, and Mans Duty (1646)Google Scholar; Bridge, William, The Saints Hiding-Place in the Time of Gods Anger (1647)Google Scholar; Carter, William, Light in Darkness (1648)Google Scholar; Bridge, William, England Saved with a Notwithstanding (1648)Google Scholar; and Christs Coming (1648).

110 Coleman, Thomas, Hopes Deferred and Dashed (1645), Preface, 1.Google Scholar

111 The Whitehall Debates, in Woodhouse, , Puritanism and Liberty, p. 126Google Scholar. I also used The Clark Papers, Firth, C. H., ed., the Camden Society, 2 vols. (London 1891, 1894).Google Scholar

112 The Whitehall Debates, pp. 126, 153, 160.

113 Woodhouse, , Puritanism and Liberty, p. 81.Google Scholar

114 Baxter, Richard, The Autobiography of Richard Baxter, Thomas, J. M. L. and Keeble, N. H., eds. (London, 1974), p. 84.Google Scholar

115 Baxter, Richard, “A Disswasive from unnecessary Division and Separation, and the Real Concord of the Moderate Independents with the Presbyterians” (1655), in Baxter, , Church Concord (1691), pp. 53–54.Google Scholar

116 “A Letter of the Presbyterian Ministers in the City of London … to the Reverend Assembly of Divines,” January 1645, in Assheton, William, Toleration Disapproved and Condemned (1670), p. 62.Google Scholar

117 Inquiries into the causes of our miseries (1644), p. 11.Google Scholar

118 The Compleate Intelligencer and Resolver, November 14, 1643, p. 45.Google Scholar

119 Cotton, John, The Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, pp. 88, 152–56Google Scholar. On Puritanism in New England, see my, “Theocracy in Massachusetts: The Nature and Meaning of the Holy Experiment in the Wilderness,” The Journal of Religious History 14, no. 2 (December 1986): 138–151Google Scholar, “The Ministers' View of Church and State in Early Massachusetts,” Scripta Hierosolymitana 32, in Studies in American Civilization, Budick, E. M., et al., eds., (Jerusalem, 1987), pp. 1–25Google Scholar, “Puritan Millennialism and Theocracy in Early Massachusetts,” History of European Ideas 8, no. 3 (1987): 309–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar, “The Gospel of Reformation: The Origins of the Great Puritan Migration,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 38, no. 4 (October 1986): 584–602Google Scholar, and “The Millennial Quest in the New England Errand Into the Wilderness,” Religion, Ideology and Nationalism in Europe and America, Essays in Honor of Prof. Y. Arieli (Jerusalem, 1986), pp. 187–201.Google Scholar

120 “The Cambridge Platform, 1646–48,” in Walker, Williston, The Creeds and Platforms of Congregationalism (Boston, 1960), pp. 236–37.Google Scholar

121 Williams, Roger, The Bloudy Tenent of Persecution, pp. 349–51, 355–56.Google Scholar