Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2014
It has long been an established part of the Cromwellian legend that some time during the 1630's Oliver Cromwell made the decision to abandon England in favor of a fresh start in the New World but was prevented from doing so by the government of Charles I. There is evidence that among the Puritan leaders he was not alone in this resolve. What were the motives that led such men to consider leaving England? How serious were they? Why were their plans not carried out? This essay will examine the case of Sir Arthur Hesilrige about whom sufficient evidence exists to allow us to supply the answers to some basic questions about the Puritan leaders' intended emigration to New England.
Sir Arthur Hesilrige, the second son of Sir Thomas Hesilrige, baronet of Nosely, was born in 1601. His family, an ancient and prosperous member of the landed gentry, possessed the manor of Nosely in Leicestershire and had extensive holdings and connections in Northumberland, the county of their origin. Little is known of his early life. He was educated at Magdalene College, Cambridge and at Gray's Inn where he may well have met several future parliamentarians and Cromwellians with whom he was later to associate. In 1624 upon completion of his education he married Frances Elmes, the daughter of Thomas Elmes, a Northhampshire gentleman. Six years later in January, 1630, upon his father's death, Arthur succeeded to the baronetcy and the estates, his elder brother having preceded his father in death.
1 A complete discussion of the various early accounts describing Cromwell's intended emigration to New England may be found in The Story of the Embarkation of Cromwell and his Friends for New England (Boston, 1866).Google Scholar
2 Hexter, Jack H., The Reign of King Pym (Cambridge, Mass., 1941), p. 78.Google Scholar
3 The complete story of the founding and ultimate failure of the Providence Company is to be found in Newton, A. P., The Colonizing Activities of the English Puritans (New Haven, 1914).Google Scholar
4 Trumbull, Benjamin, History of Connecticut (New London, 1898), I, pp. 9–10, and Appendix 1, pp. 423–24.Google Scholar
5 Bradford, William, History of Plymouth Plantation, 1620-1647, Ford, Worthington C., ed. (Mass. Hist. Soc., 1912), n.p. 176.Google Scholar
6 Nichols, John, The History and Antiquities of the County of Leicister (London, 1795–1851), vol. II, pt. II, p. 743Google Scholar; Catalogue of the Papers of the Rt. Hon. Lord Hazlerigg of Nosely (deposited on indefinite loan at the Leicestershire Record Office), p. 15.Google Scholar
7 The description below of this affair is based on the account in the Calendar of State Papers, Domestic Series of the Reign of Charles I, 1631-33 (London, 1862), pp. 445–56Google Scholar, (hereafter cited as C.S.P.D., Charles I).
8 An account of this encounter appears in Bradford, , History, II. pp. 175–181Google Scholar, and Winthrop, John, History of New England, Hosmer, James Kendall, ed. (New York, 1908): I, pp. 123–24, 137.Google Scholar
9 Newton, , The Colonizing Activities of the English Puritans, p. 177.Google Scholar
10 Andrews, Charles M., The Colonial Period of American History (New Haven, 1936): II, pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
11 Winthrop Papers (Boston, 1929–1947): III, p. 198.Google Scholar
12 Ibid.
13 Winthrop, , History of New England, pp. 161–162.Google Scholar
14 Winthrop Papers, pp. 201–206.
15 The text of this document is printed under the title “Certain Proposals made by Lord Say, Lord Brooke, and other Persons of quality, as conditions of their removing to New England, with the answers thereto” in Hutchinson, Thomas, The History of the Colony and Province of Massachusetts-Bay, Mayo, Lawrence Shaw, ed. (Cambridge, Mass.. 1936): I, pp. 410–413.Google Scholar
16 Ibid., p. 412.
17 Ibid., pp. 414–415. Hutchinson also prints a letter from the Rev. John Cotten to Lord Say and Sele on the subject.
18 Edward, , Earl of Clarendon, The History of the Rebellion (Oxford, 1807): I. p. 351.Google Scholar
19 Diary of Sir Archibald Johnston of Wariston, 1655-1660, Ogilvie, James D., ed. (Edinburgh, 1940): III, p. 124.Google Scholar
20 Hutchinson, , The History of the Colony and Province of Massachusetts-Bay, p. 410.Google Scholar
21 Andrews, , The Colonial Period of American History, II, pp. 88–91.Google Scholar
22 Winthrop Papers, III, p. 209.Google Scholar
23 See the letter of Emmanuel Downing to John Winthrop, Jr. “Sir Hesilrigg refuseth to deall for Capten Endicotts howse, because as he sayth, the merchants telleth him, the howse is theirs, and built with theire monie etc.” Ibid., p. 233.
24 C.S.P.D., Charles I, 1634-35, pp. 494, 532, 534, 542.
25 C.S.P.D., Charles I, 1641-43, p. 547.
26 C.S.P.D., Charles I, 1635, p. 604.
27 Winthrop Papers, III, p. 216.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., p. 212.
29 Ibid., pp. 261-262.
30 This was at least Lion Gardiner's impression since he continued to write to Winthrop in this capacity for some time. Ibid., pp. 319-321, 381-382.
31 Winthrop, , History of New England, pp. 165–166.Google Scholar
32 Underhill, John, Newes From America (London, 1638), pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
33 Rushworth, John, Historical Collections (London, 1680–1701), Pt. II. vol. I, pp. 409, 883.Google Scholar
34 Winthrop Papers, III, p. 388.Google Scholar
35 C.S.P.D., Charles I, 1636-37, p. 543.
36 a'Wood, Anthony, Athenae Oxonienses (London, 1721): II, p. 273.Google Scholar
37 Andrews, , The Colonial Period of American History, II, p. 121.Google Scholar