Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2014
In the sense that myth is a reordering of various random elements into an intelligible, useful pattern, a structuring of the past in terms of present priorities, nineteenth-century Englishmen were inveterate myth-makers. As liberal and scientific thought shook the foundations of belief, the Victorians erected gothic spires as monuments to a medieval order of supposedly simple, strong faith. While their industrial masses languished, they extolled the virtues of self-made men. Confronted with foreign competitors and rebellious colonials, they instinctively asserted the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race. In classic myth-making style, the Victorians set about “reorganizing traditional components in the face of new circumstances or, correlatively, in reorganizing new, imported components in the light of tradition.”
Myth not only serves self-validating ends; it also provides a cohesive rationale, a fulcrum propelling people towards great achievements. If the Victorians were confident and self-congratulatory, they had cause to be: their material, intellectual, and political accomplishments were many. Not the least of their successes was in the sphere of sports and games, a subject often ignored by historians. Especially in the development of ball games—Association and Rugby football, cricket, lawn tennis, and golf—the Victorians modernized old games, created new ones, and exported them all to the four corners of the earth. Stereotyped as overly-serious folk, they in fact “taught the world to play.”
Since sport, more than most forms of human activity, lends itself to myth-making, it is not surprising to find a myth emerging among the late-Victorians having to do with the origins of Rugby football. Like baseball's Doubleday myth, the tale of William Webb Ellis inspiring the distinctive game of rugby is a period piece, reflecting more of the era which gave it birth than of the event to which it referred.
An earlier version of this paper was presented in May, 1979, at the annual conference of the North American Society for Sport History in Austin, Texas.
1 Obviously I am rejecting the Oxford English Dictionary's old definition of myth as “a purely fictitious narrative” or “a fictitious or imaginary person or object” (OED, 6:818) in favor of the recent consensus of structural anthropologists exemplified in Maranda, Pierre, ed., Mythology (Harmondsworth, England, 1971).Google Scholar
2 Maranda, , Mythology, p. 8.Google Scholar
3 SirTrevelyan, Charles, “They Taught the World to Play,” Victorian Studies 2 (1958–1959): 211–22.Google Scholar
4 Huizinga, Johan, Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture (Boston, 1955), p. 4.Google Scholar
5 For a convincing treatment of the subject, see Dunning, Eric and Sheard, Kenneth, Barbarians, Gentlemen and Players: A Sociological Study of the Development of Rugby Football (New York, 1979), pp. 65–99.Google Scholar
6 Bloxom's Principles of Gothic Architecture, originally published in 1829, went through ten editions by 1859: Dictionary of National Biography, Supplement, 1:226.Google Scholar
7 The Meteor (Rugby), 10 October 1876, p. 528.Google ScholarPubMed
8 Ibid., 22 December 1880, p. 156.
9 Football: Its History for Five Centuries (London, 1885).Google Scholar
10 Shearman, Montague, Athletics and Football (London, 1889), p. 274.Google Scholar
11 The Origin of Rugby Football (Rugby, 1897), pp. 12–19Google ScholarPubMed. For these references and xeroxed copies of Bloxom's letters to The Meteor, I am grateful to Mrs. Jennifer Macrory, the Assistant Librarian at Rugby School.
12 Guiart, Jean, “Multiple Levels of Meaning in Myth,” in Maranda, , Mythology, p. 116.Google Scholar
13 Bamford, T.W., Rise of the Public Schools: A Study of Boys' Public Boarding Schools in England and Wales from 1837 to the Present Day (London, 1967), p. 75.Google Scholar
14 Webster, F.A.M., Our Great Public Schools: Their Traditions, Customs, and Games (London, 1937).Google Scholar
15 For Rugby football's importance in terms of institutional “identity and status,” see Dunning, and Sheard, , Barbarians, Gentlemen and Players, pp. 175–200.Google Scholar
16 See Newsome, Davis, Godliness and Good Learning: Four Studies on a Victorian Ideal (London, 1961), pp. 195–239Google Scholar; cf. Bamford, , Rise of the Public Schools, p. 74–83.Google Scholar
17 Shearman, , Athletics and Football, p. 370Google Scholar. For a critique of these assumptions see Gathorne-Hardy, Jonathan, The Old School Tie: The Phenomenon of the English Public School (New York, 1977), p. 148.Google Scholar
18 See the chapter on “Games and Sex” in ibid., pp. 144-180.
19 See Walvin, James, The People's Game: The Social History of British Football (Newton Abbott, 1975), pp. 50–68Google Scholar; Mason, Tony, Association Football and English Society, 1863-1915 (Brighton, 1980)Google Scholar; cf. Baker, William J., “The Making of a Working Class Football Culture in Victorian England,” Journal of Social History 13, 3 (1979): 241–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Almond, H.H., “Football as a Moral Agent,” The Nineteenth Century 34 (1893): 904, 908.Google Scholar
21 The Times, 13 and 21 August, and 9 September 1895.
22 Almond, , “Football as a Moral Agent,” pp. 905, 910–11Google Scholar; cf. Coleman, C.S., “The Football Season,” The Badminton Magazine of Sports and Pastimes 2(1896): 532–44Google Scholar: “The curse of professionalism is the danger that every other consideration will be sacrificed to the ‘gate”” (P. 533).
23 Fry, C. B., “Football,” The Badminton Magazine of Sports and Pastimes I (1895): 490Google Scholar; cf. Coleman, , “The Football Season,” p. 540.Google Scholar
24 Shearman, , Athletics and Football, pp. 308–9Google Scholar. According to one “old boy,” under the old style of play “it was considered an act of cowardice to throw the ball away before you were tackled, or even after”: Fleming, C.J.N., “Rugby Football,” The Badminton Library of Sports and Pastimes 3 (1896): 556.Google Scholar
25 Quoted from Burridge, Kenelm, Mambu: A Study of Melanesian Cargo Movements and Their Ideological Background (London, 1960)Google Scholar, in Maranda, , Mythology, p. 127.Google Scholar
26 Mack, Edward C. and Armytage, W.H.G., Thomas Hughes: The Life of the Author of Tom Brown's Schooldays (London, 1952), p. 90.Google Scholar
27 Rouse, W.H.D., A History of Rugby School (New York, 1898), pp. 265–66.Google Scholar
28 Maranda, , Mythology, p. 8.Google Scholar
29 Buckle, Henry Thomas, History of Civilization in England, 3 vols. (London, 1902), 1:20.Google Scholar
30 Carlyle, Thomas, On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History (London, 1897), p. 1.Google Scholar
31 Kingsley, Charles, The Roman and the Teuton, in Works, 28 vols. (London, 1880–1885), 10:326Google Scholar; Froude, J. A., Thomas Carlyle: A History of His Life in London 1834-1881, 2 vols. (London, 1891), 1;187.Google Scholar
32 Burridge, , “Cargo,” in Maranda, , Mythology, p. 130.Google Scholar
33 Huizinga, , Homo Ludens, p. 136.Google Scholar
34 Burridge, , “Cargo,” in Maranda, , Mythology, p. 127.Google Scholar
35 The Times, 2 November 1923; Wymer, Norman, Sport in England: A History of Two Thousand Years of Games and Pastimes (London, 1949), p. 239.Google Scholar
36 Marriott, C.J.B., Modern Rugby Football (London, 1924), p. 1.Google Scholar
37 Dunning, and Sheard, , Barbarians, Gentlemen and Players, pp. 234–40Google Scholar. For the change of several public schools to Rugby football, see the chapters on Beaumont, Malvern, Rossall, St. Albans, and Stowe in Webster, Great Public Schools.
38 Magoun, F.P. Jr., History of Football from the Beginnings to 1871 (Cologne, 1938), p. 85.Google Scholar
39 Marples, Morris, A History of Football (London, 1954), pp. 117–18.Google Scholar
40 Owen, O.L., The History of the Rugby Football Union (London, 1955), p. 30Google Scholar. In fairness to Owen, he did conclude that “the essential thing remains not so much that a boy named Ellis, in such and such a year, made a run ‘with the ball in his arms’ but that the game which came to be called Rugby did in fact emanate from that school.”
41 Young, Percy M., A History of British Football (London, 1973), p. 99.Google Scholar
42 See, for example, Bamford, , Rise of the Public Schools, p. 77Google Scholar: Wymer, , Sport in England, p. 239Google Scholar; Hole, Christina, English Sports and Pastimes (London, 1949), p. 55.Google Scholar
43 Camp, Walter, The Book of Foot-ball (New York, 1910), p. 11Google Scholar, and Davis, Parke H., Football: The American Intercollegiate Game (New York, 1911), pp. 25–27.Google Scholar
44 Hill, Dean, Football Thru the Ages (New York, 1940), p. 7Google Scholar. For this rhetoric, Hill relied almost verbatim on Parke H. Davis, Football.
45 Riesman, David, Individualism Reconsidered (New York, 1954), p. 244.Google Scholar
46 Treat, Roger, The Encyclopedia of Football (New York, 1977), p. 16Google Scholar; Menke, Frank G., The New Encyclopedia of Sports (New York, 1947), pp. 410, 490Google Scholar. McCallum, John and Pearson, Charles H., College Football U.S.A. (New York, 1972), p. 79Google Scholar; Claasen, Harold, The History of Professional Football (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963), p. 5Google Scholar; Weyland, Alexander M., The Saga of American Football (New York, 1955), p. 9.Google Scholar
47 Encyclopedia Americana (1974 ed.), 23:755–56Google Scholar; Collier's Encyclopedia (1975 ed.), 20:270Google Scholar; Funk and Wagnall's Standard Reference Encyclopedia (1966 ed.), 10:3624Google Scholar. The World Book Encyclopedia (1969 ed.) hedges its bet: “Many people believe that rugby began at Rugby School, England, in 1823” (16:473).
48 Walvin, , The People's Game, p. 34.Google Scholar
49 Arlott, John, ed., The Oxford Companion to Sports and Games (London, 1975), pp. 882–83.Google Scholar
50 See Armitage, John, Man at Play: Nine Centuries of Pleasure (London, 1977), p. 123.Google Scholar
51 Dunning, Eric, “Industrialization and the Incipient Modernization of Football: A Study in Historical Sociology,” Stadion 1 (1975): 137–38.Google Scholar
52 Supra., f.n. 5.