Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:25:36.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Radiocarbon Dating of Temper in Shell-Tempered Ceramics: Test Cases from Mississippi, Southeastern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Evan Peacock
Affiliation:
Cobb Institute of Archaeology, P.O. Box AR, Mississippi State, MS 39762 (peacock@anthro.msstate.edu)
James K. Feathers
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Department of Anthropology, Box 353100, Seattle, WA 98195-3100 (jimf@u. washington.edu)

Abstract

Direct dating of artifacts is preferable to dating via association in most archaeological situations. In this article we describe and discuss the first application of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) to directly date temper particles in shell-tempered pottery. This method can be applied to ceramics from around the world that are tempered with freshwater or marine shell. To assess the method, we examine 34 new or previously reported dates (AMS dates on shell temper, paired luminescence dates from the same ceramics, and associated radiocarbon dates on other biotic materials) from seven sites in a variety of geological settings in the state of Mississippi. The results show that a freshwater reservoir effect is present in most cases. Other potential complicating factors include variable carbon input and metabolic uptake rates over space and time and the effects of burning during temper preparation or pottery firing. Despite these problems, the method holds promise for dating surface materials, museum specimens, and burial accompaniments; for investigating settlement patterns; and for other areas of research.

Résumé

Résumé

En la mayoría de las investigaciones arqueológicas es preferible datar la antigüedad de un artefacto usando métodos directos que por asociación. Por primera vez, empleamos un método directo para establecer la datación de cerámica templada con conchas usando Espectrometría de Masa Acelerada. Este método puede ser aplicado a cerámicas templadas con conchas de agua dulce o salada en todo el mundo. Para estimar el método examinamos 34 fechas nuevas o previamente reportadas (fechas AMS en conchas templadas, fechas asociadas con la luminiscencia en la misma cerámica y fechas asociadas a radiocarbono en otros materiales bióticos) de siete sitios en una variedad de sistemas ecológicos en el estado de Mississippi. Los resultados muestran que un efecto de depósitos de agua dulce está presente en la mayoría de los casos. Otros posibles factores incluyen variables en el consume de entrada de carbon y la tasa de absorción metabólica en espacio y tiempo, además de los efectos de quema durante la preparación para el templado o quemadura de la cerámica. A pesar de estos problemas, el método es prometedor para establecer la edad de la superficie de materiales, especimenes en museos, acompañamientos en fosas, para la investigación de patrones de asentamiento y otras áreas de investigación.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ambers, Janet, Bowman, Sheridan, Gibson, Alex, and Kinnes, Ian 1992 Radiocarbon Results for the British Beakers. Radiocarbon 34:916927.Google Scholar
Atkinson, James R. 1974 Test Excavations at the Vaughn Mound Site. Appendix A. In Archeological Survey and Test Excavations in the Upper-Central Tombigbee River Valley: Aliceville-Columbus Lock and Dam and Impoundment Areas, Alabama and Mississippi, by Marc D. Rucker, pp. 115151. Submitted to the National Park Service by the Department of Anthropology, Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
Atkinson, James R. 1979 A Historic Contact Indian Settlement in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi. Journal of Alabama Archaeology 25(1):6182.Google Scholar
Atkinson, James R. 1987 Historic Chickasaw Cultural Material: A More Comprehensive Identification. Mississippi Archaeology 22(2):3362.Google Scholar
Baca, Keith A. 1998 Pocahontas Mound A Vandalism Incident. Submitted to the Mississippi Department of Archives and History, March 30. Copies available from the Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Banerjee, D., Murray, A. S., Bøtter-Jensen, L., and Lang, A. 2001 Equivalent Dose Estimation Using a Single Aliquot of Polymineral Fine Grains. Radiation Measurements 33:7393.Google Scholar
Batten, R. J., Gillespie, Richard, Gowlett, J. A. J., and Hedges, R. E. M. 1986 The AMS Dating of Separate Fractions in Archaeology. Radiocarbon 28:698701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Rainer, and Meek, Norman 1992 Radiocarbon Dating of Anodonta in the Mojave River Basin. Radiocarbon 34:578584.Google Scholar
Bezerra, Francisco Hilario Rego, Vita-Finzi, Claudio, and Filho, Francisco Pinheiro Lima 2000 The Use of Marine Shells for Radiocarbon Dating of Coastal Deposits. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 30(1):211213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blakeman, Crawford H. Jr. 1985 An Archaeological Site Survey in Central Oktibbeha County, Mississippi: June-July 1975. In Anthology of Mississippi Archaeology, edited by Patricia Galloway, pp. 188215. Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Bonsall, Clive, Cook, Gordon, Manson, Joni L., and Sanderson, David 2002 Direct Dating of Neolithic Pottery: Progress and Prospects. Documenta Praehistorica 29:4759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boszhardt, Robert 2008 Shell-Tempered Pottery from the Upper Mississippi River Valley. Southeastern Archaeology 27:265285.Google Scholar
Boyd, Claude E., and Wayne Walley, W. 1975 Total Alkalinity and Hardness of Surface Waters in Alabama and Mississippi. Bulletin 465, Agricultural Experiment Station. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.Google Scholar
Brain, Jeffrey P. 1989 Winterville: Late Prehistoric Culture Contact in the Lower Mississippi Valley. Archaeological Report No. 23. Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Briggs, Richard W., Wesnousky, Steven G., and Adams, Kenneth D. 2005 Late Pleistocene and Late Holocene Lake Highstands in the Pyramid Lake Subbasin of Lake Lahonton, Nevada, USA. Quaternary Research 64:257263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burleigh, Richard 1983 Two Radiocarbon Dates for Freshwater Shells from Hierakonpolis: Archaeological and Geological Interpretations. Journal of Archaeological Science 10:361367.Google Scholar
Campbell, Matthew 2005 The Archaeology of Kakahi (Hyridella menziesi). Archaeology in New Zealand 48:101112.Google Scholar
Cook, Gordon T., Bonsall, C., Hedges, Robert E. M., McSweeney, K., Boronean, V., and Pettitt, Paul B. 2001 A Freshwater Diet-Derived 14C Reservoir Effect at the Stone Age Sites in the Iron Gates Gorge. Radiocarbon 43:453460.Google Scholar
Cook, Gordon T., Bonsall, C., Hedges, Robert E. M., McSweeney, K., Boronean, V., and Pettitt, Paul B. 2002 Problems of Dating Human Bones from the Iron Gates. Antiquity 76:7785.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, James B. 1964 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates IX. Radiocarbon 6:124.Google Scholar
Culleton, Brendan J. 2006 Implications of a Freshwater Radiocarbon Reservoir Correction for the Timing of Late Holocene Settlement of the Elk Hills, Kern County, California. Journal of Archaeological Science 33:13311339.Google Scholar
Culleton, Brendan J., Kennett, Douglas J., Lynn Ingram, B., Erlandson, Jon M., and Southon, John R. 2006 Intrashell Radiocarbon Variability in Marine Mollusks. Radiocarbon 48:387400.Google Scholar
Dark, P., Higham, T. F. G., Jacobi, R., and Lord, T. C. 2006 New Radiocarbon Accelerator Dates on Artefacts from the Early Mesolithic Site of Star Carr, North Yorkshire. Archaeometry 48:185200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Atley, Suzanne P. 1980 Radiocarbon Dating of Ceramic Materials: Progress and Prospects. Radiocarbon 22:987993.Google Scholar
Dettman, David L., Reische, Aimee K., and Lohmann, Kyger C. 1999 Controls on the Stable Isotope Composition of Sea sonal Growth Bands in Aragonitic Fresh-Water Bivalves (Unionidae). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 63:10491057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnell, Robert C. 2000 Dating Method and Theory. In Archaeological Method and Theory: An Encyclopedia, edited by Linda Ellis, pp. 172173. Garland, New York.Google Scholar
Dunnell, Robert C., and Feathers, James K. 1994 Thermoluminescence Dating of Surficial Archaeological Material. In Dating in Exposed and Surface Contexts, edited by Charlotte Beck, pp. 115137. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Elsen, Dean, and Wieland, Ronald 2003 Rediscovery and Management of Prairie Remnants of the Bienville National Forest, East-Central Mississippi. In Blackland Prairies of the Gulf Coastal Plain: Nature, Culture, and Sustainability, edited by Evan Peacock and Timothy Schauwecker, pp. 239245. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Erlandson, Jon M., Macko, Michael E., Koerper, Henry C., and Southon, John 2005 The Antiquity of Olivella Shell Beads at CA-ORA-64: AMS Radiocarbon Dated Between 9420 and 7780 cal BR Journal of Archaeological Science 32:393398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Charles H. 1972 The Mississippian-Woodland Transition in the Middle South. Bulletin of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference 15:3845.Google Scholar
Feathers, James K. 1997 The Application of Luminescence Dating in American Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4:166.Google Scholar
Feathers, James K. 2008 Absolute Dating in the Mississippi Delta. In Time’s River: Archaeological Syntheses from the Lower Mississippi Valley, edited by Janet Rafferty and Evan Peacock, pp. 168181. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Feathers, James K. 2009 Problems of Ceramic Chronology in the Southeast: Does Shell-Tempered Pottery Occur Earlier than We Think? American Antiquity 74:113142.Google Scholar
Filley, T. R., Freeman, K. H., Bianchi, T. S., Baskaran, M., Colarusso, L. A., and Hatcher, P. G. 2001 An Isotopic Biogeochemical Assessment of Shifts in Organic Matter Input to Holocene Sediments from Mud Lake, Florida. Organic Geochemistry 32:11531167.Google Scholar
Fischer, Anders, and Heinemeier, Jan 2003 Freshwater Reservoir Effect in 14C Dates of Food Residue on Pottery. Radiocarbon 45:449466.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard T., Jones, Terry L., and Schroth, Adella 2005 Ancient Long-Distance Trade in Western North America: New AMS Radiocarbon Dates from Southern California. Journal of Archaeological Science 32:423434.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1936 Analysis of Indian Village Site Collections from Louisiana and Mississippi. Anthropological Study No. 2. Department of Conservation, Louisiana Geological Survey, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Gabasio, Martine, Evin, Jacques, Arnal, Gaston Bernard, and Andrieux, Phillipe 1986 Origins of Carbon in Potsherds. Radiocarbon 28:711718.Google Scholar
Garcia, J. E, Mestres, J. S., and Rauret, Gemma 1992 Comparing Continental Carbonates with Other Materials in Dating a Paleolake. Radiocarbon 34:619625.Google Scholar
Geist, Juergen, Auerswald, Karl, and Boom, Arnoud 2005 Stable Carbon Isotopes in Freshwater Mussel Shells: Environmental Record or Marker for Metabolic Activity? Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 69:35453554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyh, Mebus A., Schotterer, U., and Grosjean, M. 1998 Temporal Changes of the 14C Reservoir Effect in Lakes. Radiocarbon 40:921931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Thomas J., and Munson, Cheryl A. 1978 Mississippian Settlement Patterns in Southwestern Indiana. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, edited by Bruce D. Smith, pp. 293330. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hart, John P., and Lovis, William A. 2007 A Multi-Regional Analysis of AMS and Radiometric Dates from Carbonized Food Residues. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 32:201262.Google Scholar
Hedges, R. E. M., Tiemei, Chen, and Housley, R. A. 1992 Results and Methods in the Radiocarbon Dating of Pottery. Radiocarbon 34:906915.Google Scholar
Herbert, Joseph M. 2008 The History and Practice of Shell Tempering in the Middle Atlantic: A Useful Balance. Southeastern Archaeology 27:265285.Google Scholar
Hilliard, Jerry E., and Mainfort, Robert C. Jr. 2007 The Ira Spradley Field Site: A Late Woodland Cemetery in the Arkansas Ozarks. Southeastern Archaeology 26:269291.Google Scholar
Hogue, S. Homes, and Peacock, Evan 1995 Environmental and Osteological Analysis at the South Farm Site (220K534), a Mississippian Farmstead in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 14:3145.Google Scholar
House, John H. 1987 Kent Phase Investigations in Eastern Arkansas, 1978–1984. Mississippi Archaeology 22:4660.Google Scholar
House, John H. 1993 Dating the Kent Phase. Southeastern Archaeology 12:2132.Google Scholar
Huntley, D. J., and Lamothe, M. 2001 Ubiquity of Anomalous Fading in K-Feldspars, and Measurement and Correction for It in Optical Dating. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 38:10931106.Google Scholar
Ingram, B. Lynn, and Southon, John R. 1996 Reservoir Ages in Pacific Coast Estuarine Waters. Radiocarbon 38:573582.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jesse D. 1941 Chickasaw and Earlier Indian Cultures of Northeast Mississippi. Journal of Mississippi History 3:155226.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K. 1996 The Nature and Timing of the Late Prehistoric Settlement of the Black Prairie in Mississippi: A Reply to Hogue, Peacock, and Rafferty. Southeastern Archaeology 15:244249.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K. 1997 Stone Tools, Politics, and the Eighteenth-Century Chickasaw in Northeast Mississippi. American Antiquity 62:215230.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K., and Sparks, John T. 1986 Protohistoric Settlement Patterns in Northeastern Mississippi. In The Protohistoric Period in the Mid-South: 1500–1700, edited by David H. Dye and Ronald C. Brister, pp. 6481. Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Archaeological Report No. 18. Jackson.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K., Lehmann, Geoffrey R., Atkinson, James R., Scott, Susan L., and Shea, Andrea 1991 Protohistoric Chickasaw Settlement Patterns and the De Soto Route in Northeast Mississippi. Submitted to the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Geographic Society by the University of Mississippi, Center for Archaeological Research, Oxford.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jessica S., Clark, Jeff, Miller-Antonio, Sari, Robins, Don, Schiffer, Michael B., and Skibo, James M. 1988 Effects of Firing Temperature on the Fate of Naturally Occurring Organic Matter in Clays. Journal of Archaeological Science 15:403413.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. A., Stipp, J. J., Tamers, M. A., Bonani, Georges, Suter, Martin, and Wölfi, Willy 1986 Archaeologic SherdDating: Comparison of Thermoluminescence Dates with Radiocarbon Dates by Beta Counting and Accelerator Techniques. Radiocarbon 28:719725.Google Scholar
Jones, Terry L., Porcasi, Judith F., Gaeta, Jereme W., and Codding, Brian F. 2008 The Diablo Canyon Fauna: A Coarse-Grained Record of Trans-Holocene Foraging from the Central California Mainland Coast. American Antiquity 73:289316.Google Scholar
Keith, M. L., and Anderson, G. M. 1963 Radiocarbon Dating: Fictitious Results with Mollusk Shells. Science 141:634637.Google Scholar
Kolić, Emmanuelle Delqué 1995 Direct Radiocarbon Dating of Pottery: Selective Heat Treatment to Retrieve Smoke-Derived Carbon. Special issue, “Proceedings of the 15th International 14C Conference,” edited by Gordon T. Cook, Douglas D. Harkness, Brian F. Miller, and E. Marian Scott, Radiocarbon 37:275284.Google Scholar
Levy, Thomas E., and Higham, Thomas (editors) 2005 The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science. Equinox Publishing Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Licciardi, Joseph M. 2001 Chronology of Latest Pleistocene Lake-Level Fluctuations in the Pluvial Lake Chewaucan Basin, Oregon, USA. Journal of Quaternary Science 16:545553.Google Scholar
Lin, Jo C, Broecker, Wallace S., Hemming, Sidney R., Hajdas, Irena, Anderson, Robert F., Smith, George I., Kelley, Maxwell, and Bonani, Georges 1998 A Reassessment of U-Th and 14C Ages for Late-Glacial High-Frequency Hydrological Events at Searles Lake, California. Quaternary Research 49:1123.Google Scholar
Lipo, Carl P., Feathers, James K., and Dunnell, Robert C. 2005 Temporal Data Requirements, Luminescence Dates, and the Resolution of Chronological Structure of Late Prehistoric Deposits in the Central Mississippi River Valley. American Antiquity 70:527544.Google Scholar
Little, Keith J. 2001 A Study of Paleoclimate and Shell Deposition at Archaeological Sites in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta of Southwest Alabama. Submitted to the Alabama Historical Commission. Copies available from the University of Alabama, Alabama Museum of Natural History, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Maritan, L., Mazzoli, C., and Freestone, I. 2007 Modelling Changes in Mollusc Shell Internal Microstructure During Firing: Implications for Temperature Estimation in Shell-Bearing Pottery. Archaeometry 49:529541.Google Scholar
Maritan, L., Mazzoli, C., Michielin, V., Morandi Bonacossi, D., Luciani, M., and Molin, G. 2005 Provenance and Production Technology of Bronze Age and Iron Age Pottery from Tell Mishrifeh/Qatna (Syria). Archaeometry 47:723744.Google Scholar
Marshall, Richard A. 1989 A Report of Cultural Resources Management Survey at the Proposed Starkville Landfill Addition, Oktibbeha County, Mississippi. Submitted to Golden Triangle Regional Development Authority. Copies available from the Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
McKee, Larry 2007 Phase II Archaeological Testing at 40HK12, near Kyles Ford, Hancock County, Tennessee. Submitted to Tennessee Stream Mitigation Program, Nashville, by TRC, Inc., Nashville.Google Scholar
Mistovich, Tim S. 1995 Toward an Explanation of Variation in Moundville Phase Households in the Black Warrior Valley, Alabama. In Mississippian Communities and Households, edited by J. Daniel Rogers and Bruce D. Smith, pp. 156180. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Moran, L. P., Pettry, D. E., and Switzer, R. E. 2003 Plant and Soil Interactions in Prairie Remnants of the Jackson Prairie Region, Mississippi. In Blackland Prairies of the Gulf Coastal Plain: Nature, Culture, and Sustainability, edited by Evan Peacock and Timothy Schauwecker, pp. 146163. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Morse, Phyllis A. 1990 The Parkin Site and the Parkin Phase. In Towns and Temples Along the Mississippi, edited by David H. Dye and Cheryl A. Cox, pp. 118134. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Muller, Jon 1978 The Kincaid System: Mississippian Settlement in the Environs of a Large Site. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, edited by Bruce D. Smith, pp. 269292. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Overstreet, David F. 1978 Oneota Settlement Patterns in Eastern Wisconsin: Some Considerations of Time and Space. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, edited by Bruce D. Smith, pp. 2152. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Palmer, Nicole 2007 Diachronic Change in Residence Patterns at the Curry Site, a Mississippian Period Single-Mound Site in North Mississippi. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Memphis, Memphis.Google Scholar
Peacock, Evan 1995 Test Excavations at an Upland Mississippian Site in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi. Mississippi Archaeology 30:120.Google Scholar
Peacock, Evan, and Homes Hogue, S. 2005 A New Series of Absolute Dates from Lyon’s Bluff (22OK520), North Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 24:4658.Google Scholar
Peacock, Evan, and Mistak, Sarah 2008 Freshwater Mussel (Unionidae) Remains from the Bilbo Basin Site, Mississippi, U.S.A.: Archaeological Considerations and Resource Management Implications. Archaeofauna: International Journal of Zooarchaeology 17:920.Google Scholar
Peacock, Evan, Neff, Hector, Rafferty, Janet, and Meaker, Thomas 2007 Using Laser Ablation–Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) to Source Shell in Shell-Tempered Pottery: A Pilot Study from North Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 26:319329.Google Scholar
Peacock, Evan, and Rafferty, Janet 1996 Settlement Pattern Continuity and Change in the Mississippi Black Prairie: A Response to Johnson. Southeastern Archaeology 15:249253.Google Scholar
Peacock, Evan, and Seltzer, Jennifer L. 2008 A Comparison of Multiple Proxy Data Sets for Paleoenvironmental Conditions as Derived from Freshwater Bivalve (Unionid) Shell. Journal of Archaeological Science 35:25572565.Google Scholar
Peebles, Christopher S. 1978 Determinants of Settlement Size and Location in the Moundville Phase. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, edited by Bruce D. Smith, pp. 369416. Academic Press. New York.Google Scholar
Prescott, J. R., Huntley, D. J., and Hutton, J. T. 1993 Estimation of Equivalent Dose in Thermoluminescence Dating—The Australian Slide Method. Ancient TL 11:15.Google Scholar
Price, James E. 1978 The Settlement Pattern of the Powers Phase. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, edited by Bruce D. Smith, pp. 201231. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rafferty, Janet 1990 Test Excavations at Ingomar Mounds, Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 9:93102.Google Scholar
Rafferty, Janet 1995 A Seriation of Historic Period Aboriginal Pottery from Northeast Mississippi. Journal of Alabama Archaeologv 41:180207.Google Scholar
Rafferty, Janet 2003 Prehistoric Settlement Patterning on the Mississippi Black Prairie. In Blackland Prairies of the Gulf Coastal Plain: Nature, Culture, and Sustainability, edited by Evan Peacock and Timothy Schauwecker, pp. 167193. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Rafferty, Janet, Alvey, Jeffrey, Homes Hogue, S., Peacock, Evan, and McCain, Robert 2005 Final Report on Archaeological Testing at the Pocahontas Mound A Site (22HI500), Hinds County, Mississippi. Submitted to the Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson. Mississippi State University, Cobb Institute of Archaeology, Starkville.Google Scholar
Reimer, Paula J., Baillie, Mike G. L., Bard, Edouard, Bayliss, Alex, Warren Beck, J., Bertrand, Chanda J. H., Blackwell, Paul G., Buck, Caitlin E., Burr, George S., Cutler, Kirsten B., Damon, Paul E., Lawrence Edwards, R., Fairbanks, Richard G., Friedrich, Michael, Guilderson, Thomas P., Hogg, Alan G., Hughen, Konrad A., Kromer, Bernd, McCormac, Gerry, Manning, Sturt, Ramsey, Christopher Bronk, Reimer, Ron W., Remmele, Sabine, Southon, John R., Stuiver, Minze, Talamo, Sahra, Taylor, F. W., van der Plicht, Johannes, and Weyhenmeyer, Constanze E. 2004 IntCal04 Terrestrial Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 26–0 ka BP. Radiocarbon 46:10291058.Google Scholar
Rick, Torben C., Vellanoweth, René L., and Erlandson, Jon M. 2005 Radiocarbon Dating and the “Old Shell” Problem: Direct Dating of Artifacts and Cultural Chronologies in Coastal and Other Aquatic Regions. Journal of Archaeological Science 32:16411648.Google Scholar
Ricken, Werner, Steuber, Thomas, Freitag, Heiko, Hirschfeld, Markus, and Niedenzu, Barbara 2003 Recent and Historical Discharge of a Large European River System—Oxygen Isotopic Composition of River Water and Skeletal Aragonite of Unionidae in the Rhine. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 193:7386.Google Scholar
Rubin, Meyer, and Taylor, Dwight W. 1963 Radiocarbon Activity of Shells from Living Clams and Snails. Science 141:637.Google Scholar
Rucker, Marc D. 1976 Archaeological Investigations at Pocahontas Mound A, Hinds County, Mississippi. Archaeological Excavation Report No. 3. Mississippi State Highway Department, Jackson.Google Scholar
Rye, Owen S. 1976 Keeping Temperature Under Control: Materials and the Manufacture of Papuan Pottery. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 11:106137.Google Scholar
Sabo, George III, and Hilliard, Jerry E. 2008 Woodland Period Shell-Tempered Pottery in the Central Arkansas Ozarks. Southeastern Archaeology 27(2): 164171.Google Scholar
Sassaman, Kenneth E. 1999 Stallings Island Revisited: Modern Investigation of Stratigraphy and Chronology. Submitted to the National Geographic Society by the Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Sassaman, Kenneth E., Blessing, Meggan E., and Randall, Asa R. 2006 Stallings Island Revisited: New Evidence for Occupational History, Community Pattern, and Subsistence Technology. American Antiquity 71:539565.Google Scholar
Schambach, Frank F., and Guendling, Randall 1990 The Excavations at the Bangs Slough Site. In Coles Creek and Mississippi Period Foragers in the Felsenthal Region of the Lower Mississippi Valley, edited by Frank F. Schambach, pp. 418. Arkansas Archeological Research Series No. 39. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Schöne, Bernd R., Rodland, David L., Surge, Donna M., Fiebig, Jens, Gillikin, David P., Baier, Sven M., and Goewert, Ann 2006 Comment on “Stable Carbon Isotopes in Freshwater Mussel Shells: Environmental Record or Marker for Metabolic Activity?” by J. Geist et al. (2005). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70:26582661.Google Scholar
Seltzer, Jennifer 2007 Determining the Presence of Cultural Bias in Wood Charcoal from Lyon’s Bluff (22OK520), a Mound Center in Oktibbeha County, Mississippi. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Mississippi State University, Starkville.Google Scholar
Sheldon, Craig T., and Jenkins, Ned J. 1986 Protohistoric Development in Central Alabama. In The Protohistoric Period in the Mid-South: 1500–1700, edited by David H. Dye and Ronald C. Brister, pp. 95102. Archaeological Report 18. Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. 1995 The Analysis of Single-Household Mississippian Settlements. In Mississippian Communities and Households, edited by J. Daniel Rogers and Bruce D. Smith, pp. 224249. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Solis, Carlos, and Walling, Richard 1982 Archaeological Investigations at the Yarborough Site (22C1814), Clay County, Mississippi. Report of Investigations 30. Office of Archaeological Research, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Srdoč, Dušan, Krajcar-Bronić, Ines, Horvatinčić, Nada, and Obelić, Bogomil 1986 Increase of 14C Activity of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon Along a River Course. Radiocarbon 28:515521.Google Scholar
Stäuble, Harald 1995 Radiocarbon Dates of the Earliest Neolithic in Central Europe. Special issue, “Proceedings of the 15th International 14C Conference,” edited by Gordon T. Cook, Douglas D. Harkness, Brian F. Miller, and E. Marian Scott, Radiocarbon 37:227237.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, Vincas P. 1983 Ceramics, Chronology, and Community Patterns: An Archaeological Study at Moundville. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, Vincas P. 1991 Contrasting Patterns of Mississippian Development. In Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology, edited by Timothy K. Earle, pp. 193228. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze, and Reimer, Paula J. 1993 Extended 14C Database and Revised CALIB 3.0 14C Age Calibration Program. Radiocarbon 35:215230.Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze, Reimer, Paula J., and Reimer, Ron 2005 CALIB Manual. Electronic document, http://calib.qub.ac.uk/calib/manual/, accessed January 15, 2007.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J., and Streurman, H. J. 2000 Shells in the Netherlands. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Centre for Isotope Research, Scientific Report 1995–1997, section PE-03.Google Scholar
van Strydonck, Mark, Dupas, Michel, and Dauchot-Dehon, Michelle 1986 The Influence of Contaminating (Fossil) Carbonate and the Variations of (13C in Mortar Dating. Radiocarbon 28:702710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Strydonck, Mark J. Y, van der Borg, Klaas, and De Jong, Arie F M. 1992 Dating Precolumbian Museum Objects. Radiocarbon 34:928933.Google Scholar
Vellanoweth, René L. 2001 AMS Radiocarbon Dating and Shell Bead Chronologies: Middle Holocene Trade and Interaction in Western North America. Journal of Archaeological Science 28:941950.Google Scholar
Woods, Ann J. 1986 Form, Fabric and Function: Some Observations on the Cooking Pot in Antiquity. In Technology and Style, edited by W. D. Kingery, pp. 157172. Ceramics and Civilization, Vol. 2. American Ceramic Society, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Yates, Timothy 1986 Studies of Non-Marine Mollusks for the Selection of Shell Samples for Radiocarbon Dating. Radiocarbon 28:457463.Google Scholar