Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:01:58.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Additional Cautions on the Use of the Glo Survey Records in Vegetational Reconstructions in the Midwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Abstract

Data from the United States General Land Office Surveys are frequently used to reconstruct the vegetation existing at the time of European settlement as a basis for biotic models. The vegetation recorded in those surveys had been influenced not only by climatic conditions considerably colder and more moist than the present, but by frequent, widespread burning as well. The effect of such burning on the distribution and composition of forest vegetation was as great as the climatic effects and must be taken into account when building prehistoric vegetational models in the Midwest.

Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. C. and Anderson, M. R. 1975 The presettlement vegetation of Williamsoncounty, Illinois. Castanea 40:34563.Google Scholar
Auclair, A. N. 1976 Ecological factors in the development of intensive-management ecosystems in the midwesternUnited States. Ecology 57:43144.Google Scholar
Auclair, A. N. and Cottam, G. 1971 Dynamics of black cherry (Prunus serotina Erhr.) in southern Wisconsin oak forests. EcologicalMonographs 41:15377.Google Scholar
Beilmann, A. P. and Brenner, L. G. 1951 The changing forest flora of the Ozarks. Annalsof the Missouri Botanical Garden 38:28391.Google Scholar
Boggess, W. R. and Geis, J. W. 1967 Composition of an upland, streamside forest inPiatt county, Illinois. American MidlandNaturalist 78:8997.Google Scholar
Bourdo, E. A. 1956 A review of the General Land Office surveyand of its use in quantitative studies of formerforests. Ecology 37:75468.Google Scholar
Braun, E. L. 1950 Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Blakiston Co., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J. R. 1940 The grassland biome. Ecological Monographs 10:98184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J. T. 1959 The vegetation of Wisconsin. University ofWisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Delcourt, H. R. 1976 Presettlement vegetation of the north of RedRiver land district, Louisiana. Castanea 41:12239.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, J. H. 1960 Usable forage under pine stands? U. S. ForestService, Central States Forest Experiment Station, Note No. 142.Google Scholar
Fehrenbacher, J. B., Ray, B. W. and Alexander, J. D.. 1968 Illinois soils and factors in their development.In The quaternary of Illinois, edited by R. E.Bergstrom, pp. 165–75. University of Illinois, Collegeof Agriculture, Special Publication 14.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1912 An isolated prairie grove and its phytogeographicalsignificance. Botanical Gazette 53:3849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1913 The relation of forest distribution and prairiefires in the Middle West. Torreya 13:17381.Google Scholar
Howell, D. L. and Kucera, C. L. 1956 Composition of pre-settlement forests in threecounties of Missouri. Bulletin of the Torrey BotanicalClub 83:20717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, V. R. 1947 Breeding birds of the forest edge in Illinois. Condor 49:4553.Google Scholar
Kucera, C. L. and Martin, S. C. 1957 Vegetation and soil relationships in the gladeregion of the southwestern Missouri Ozarks. Ecology 38:28591.Google Scholar
Küchler, A. W. 1964 Potential natural vegetation of the conterminousUnited States. American Geographical Society Publication 36.Google Scholar
Küchler, A. W. 1974 A new vegetation map of Kansas. Ecology 55:586604.Google Scholar
McComb, A. L. and Loomis, W. E. 1944 Subclimax prairie. Bulletin of the Torrev BotanicalClub 71:4676.Google Scholar
McMillan, R. B. 1976 The Pomme de Terre Study Locality: its setting. In Prehistoric man and his environments: Acase study in the Ozark highland, edited by Wood, W. R. and McMillan, R. B., pp. 1346. AcademicPress, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monk, C. D. 1967 Tree species diversity in the eastern deciduousforest with particular reference to north centralFlorida. American Naturalist 101:17387.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. A. and Ehrenreich, J. H. 1965 Fruit producing trees and shrubs in Missouri'sOzarks forests. Journal of Wildlife Management 22:497503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, E. L. and Penfound, W. T. 1959 The upland forests of Oklahoma. Ecology 40:593608.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. 1976 An analysis of charred seeds from a MiddleWoodland occupation site in central Missouri. InHopewellian archeology in the lower Missouririver valley, edited by A. E. Johnson. Universityof Kansas, Publications in Anthropology, No. 8. Google Scholar
Sauer, C. O. 1944 A geographical sketch of early man in America. Geographical Review 34:50273.Google Scholar
Stearns, F. W. 1949 Ninety years change in a northern hardwoodforest in Wisconsin. Ecology 30:350–58.Google Scholar
Transeau, E. N. 1935 The prairie peninsula. Ecology 16:42337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, R. J. 1974 Effects of fire on the grassland. In Fire andecosystems, edited by Kozlowski, T. T. and Ahlgren, C. E.. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. E. 1968 Prairie plants and their environment. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. 1971 Communities and ecosystems. MacMillanCo., London.Google Scholar
Wood, W. R. 1976 Vegetational reconstruction and climaticepisodes. American Antiquity 41:20607.Google Scholar
Wuenscher, J. E. and Valiunas, A. J. 1967 Presettlement forest composition of the RiverHills region of Missouri. American Midland Naturalist 78:48795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar