Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:12:41.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Angus Mammoth: A Decades-Old Scientific Controversy Resolved

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven R. Holen ,
David W. May  and
Shannon A. Mahan
Steven R. Holen
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Denver Museum of Nature & Science, Denver, Colorado 80205 (sholen@dmns.org)
David W. May
Affiliation:
Department of Geography,University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa 50614
Shannon A. Mahan
Affiliation:
United States Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Angus Mammoth site in south-central Nebraska has been controversial since its discovery in 1931 when a fluted artifact was reported to be associated with the mammoth. For nearly 80 years it has not been known if Angus was a paleontological site predating the human occupation of North America as has been asserted by some geologists and paleontologists, or an archaeological site dating to the late Pleistocene as has been advocated by some archaeologists. Geomorphic study and luminescence dating have finally solved the problem after nearly eight decades. Although microwear and technological analyses have determined that the Angus biface is an authentic artifact, TL and IRSL dates have shown that the matrix above the mammoth is much too old for a mammoth/fluted point association to be valid.

Resumen

Resumen

El sitio de mamut de Angus ha sido polémico desde su descubrimiento en 1931 cuando se reportó que un artefacto estriado estaba asociado al mamut. Por muchos años ha sido debatido si el sitio de Angus es un sitio paleontológico más viejo que Ia ocupación humana de Norteamérica, como ha sido afirmado por algunos geólogos y paleontólogos, o un sitio arqueológico que data al final del pleistoceno como piensan algunos arqueólogos. Estudios geomórficos asociados con dataciónes de luminiscencia finalmente han solucionado esta problemática después de casi ocho décadas. Estudios de microdesgaste y otros análisis tecnológicos han determinado que el Angus bifaz es un artefacto autêntico. Estudios de la geomorfologia del sitio de Angus y las fechas de TL y de IRSL han demostrado que Ia matriz sobrepuesta al mamut es demasiada vieja para que una asociación mamut/artefacto estuado sea considerada válida.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 487 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aitken, Martin. J. 1998 An Introduction to Optical Dating. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Agenbroad, Larry D. 1984 New World Mammoth Distributions. In Quaternary Extinctions: The Search for a Cause, edited by Paul Martin and Richard Klein, pp. 90–108, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Agogino, George, and Ferguson, Bobbie 1978 The Angus Mammoth: Was It a Valid Kill Site? An-thropologicaljournal of Canada 16(3):7–9.Google Scholar
Bell, Earl H., and Van Royen, William 1934 An Evaluation of Recent Nebraska Finds Sometimes Attributed to the Pleistocene. The Wisconsin Archaeologist 13(3):49–70.Google Scholar
Dixon, E. James 1999 Bones, Boats, and Bison. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Figgins, Jesse D. 1927 The Antiquity of Man in America. Natural History 27(3):229–239.Google Scholar
Figgins, Jesse D. 1931 An Additional Discovery of the Association of a “Fol-som” Artifact and Fossil Mammal Remains. Proceedings of the Colorado Museum of Natural History 10(2):23–24.Google Scholar
Gorman, Frederick 1972 The Clovis Hunters: An Alternate View of Their Environment and Ecology. In Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions, edited by Mark P. Leone, pp. 206–221. Southern Illinois University Press, Car-bondale.Google Scholar
Graham, Russell W. 1986 Taxomony of North American Mammoths. In The Col-by Mammoth Site—Taphonomy and Archaeology of a Clovis Kill in Northern Wyoming, edited by George C. Frsion and Lawrence C. Todd, pp. 165–169. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Haynes, Gary 1991 Mammoths, Mastodonts, & Elephants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Haynes, Gary 2003 The Early Peopling of North America: The Clovis Era. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Holen, Steven R. 1986 Dating the Angus Mammoth Site. Report Submitted to the Historic Preservation Office, Nebraska State Historical Society, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Holen, Steven R., and May, David W. 1996 The Angus Mammoth: Archaeology or Paleontology? Proceedings of the Nebraska Academy of Science. Lincoln, Nebraska Google Scholar
Holen, Steven. R., Muñiz, Mark P., and Patten, Bob 2008 The Angus Nebraska “Point”: Comment on Howard’s Authentication Results. Plains Anthropologist 53(207):357–366.Google Scholar
Howard, Calvin. D. 2001 Authentication Analysis of the Angus Nebraska Fluted Point. Plains Anthropologist 46(177):323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Calvin. D. 2009 Analysis and Status of the Angus Nebraska Fluted Point - A Response to Holen et al. Plains Anthropologist 54(210):163–164.Google Scholar
Johnson, William C, Willey, Karen L., Mason, Joseph A., and May, David W. 2007 Stratigraphy and Environmental Reconstruction at the Middle Wisconsinan Gilman Canyon Formation Type Locality, Buzzard’s Roost, Southwestern Nebraska, USA. Quaternary Research 67:474–486.Google Scholar
Kurten, Bjorn, and Anderson, Elaine 1980 Pleistocene Mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lang, Andreas, and Wagner, Gunther 2001 Infrared Stimulated Luminescence Dating of Holocene Colluvial Sediments Using the 410nm emission. Quaternary Science Reviews 16:393–396.Google Scholar
Maglio, Vincent J. 1973 Origin and Evolution of Elephantidae. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 63(3):1–149.Google Scholar
Millard, Hugh T, and Maat, Paula B. 1994 Thermoluminescence Dating Procedures in Use at the U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado. Open File Report (OFR) 94–249.Google Scholar
Osborn, Henry F. 1932 The “Elephas meridionalis” Stage Arrives in America. Proceedings of the Colorado Museum of Natural History 11(1):1–5. Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Osborn, Henry F. 1936 Proboscidia: A Monograph of the Discovery, Evolution, Migration and Extinction of the Mastodonts and Elephants of the World. Vol. I. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Prescott, John H., and Hutton, John T. 1994 Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: large depths and long-term time variations. Radiation Measurements 23:497–500.Google Scholar
Preusser, Frank, and Degering, Detlev 2007 Luminescence Dating of the Niederweningen Mammoth Site, Switzerland. Quaternary International 164–165:106–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, E. C, and Dreeszen, Vince H. 1965 Revision of the Classification of the Pleistocene Deposits of Nebraska. Nebraska Geological Survey Bulletin 23. University of Nebraska, Conservation and Survey Division, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Roberts, Helen M., and Wintle, Ann G. 2001 Equivalent Dose Determinations for Polymineralic Finegrains Using the SAR Protocol: Applications to a Holocene Sequence of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Quaternary Science Reviews 20:859–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, C. Bertrand 1932 Summary of Evidence Relating to the Antiquity of Man in Nebraska. Paper Presented at the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, Omaha, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Sellards, Elias H. 1952 Early Man in America: A Study in Prehistory. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Strong, William D. 1932 Recent Discoveries of Human Artifacts Associated with Extinct Animals in Nebraska. Science Service Research Announcement 130:1–8.Google Scholar
Strong, William D. 1935 An Introduction to Nebraska Archeology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 93(10). Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Wormington, H. Marie 1957 Ancient Man in North America. 4th ed. Popular Series No. 4. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver.Google Scholar