Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:19:37.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic Opal Phytoliths from Rinds of Selected Cucurbita Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven R. Bozarth
Steven R. Bozarth*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 6604
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on examination of an extensive phytolith reference collection of domesticated and nondomesticated plants, it was determined that spheroidal and hemispheroidal phytoliths with deeply scalloped surfaces of contiguous concavities can be used as indicators of selected varieties of squash in archaeological sites in the central United States. Based on this classification and the distribution of the wild buffalo gourd (Cucurbita foetidissima), squash was identified in prehistoric sites in Nebraska and Arkansas.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 1987 , pp. 607 - 615
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, P. C. 1980 A Testimony of Prehistoric Tasks : Diagnostic Residues on Stone Tool Working Edges. World Archaeology 12 : 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkley, T. M. (editor) 1977 Atlas of the Flora of the Great Plains. The Great Plains Flora Association, Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Bonnett, O. T. 1972 Silicified Cells of Grass : A Major Source of Plant Opal in Illinois Soils. Bulletin of the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station 742 : 1–32. Urbana.Google Scholar
Bozarth, S. R. 1985 Distinctive Phytoliths from Various Dicot Species. Paper presented at the 2nd Phytolith Conference, University of Minnesota, Duluth.Google Scholar
Bozarth, S. R. 1986 Morphologically Distinctive Phaseolus, Cucurbita, and Helianthus Annus Phytoliths. Proceedings of the 1984 Phytolith Workshop 1 : 56–66. North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
Brown, D. A. 1984 Prospects and Limits of a Phytolith Key for Grasses in the Central United States. Journal of Archaeological Science 11 : 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brydon, J. E., Dore, W. G., and Clark, J. S. 1963 Silicified Plant Asterosclereids Preserved in Soil. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 27 : 476–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, V. A. 1978 Phytoliths as Paleoecological Indicators. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 288 : 194–205. and T. G. Cook.Google Scholar
Conard, N., Asch, D. L., Asch, N. B., Elmore, D., Gove, H., Rubin, M., Brown, J. A., Wiant, M. D., Farnsworth, K. B. 1984 Accelerator Radiocarbon Dating of Evidence for Prehistoric Horticulture in Illinois. Nature 308(29) : 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, H. C. 1977 Foreword. In Uses of Plants by the Indians of the Missouri River Region, by Gilmore, M. R.. Reprinted, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. Originally published 1919, 33rd Annual Report, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Cutler, H. C, and Whitaker, T. W. 1961 History and Distribution of the Cultivated Cucurbits in the Americas. American Antiquity 26 : 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daubenmire, R. F. 1974 Plants and Environments. 3rd ed. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Geis, J. W. 1973 Biogenic Silica in Selected Species of Deciduous Angiosperms. Soil Science 116(2) : 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M., King, F. B., and Robinson, C. K. 1980 Cucurbits from Phillips Spring : New Evidence and Interpretations. American Antiquity 45 : 806–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. L., and Geis, J. W. 1978 Biogenic Silica in the Pinaceae. Soil Science 126(3) : 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurmann, M. H. 1980 An Opal Phytolith and Palynomorph Study of Extant and Fossil Soils in Kansas. Master's thesis, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. O. 1981 Use of Opal Phytoliths in Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction. Journal of Ethnobiology 1(1) : 175–181.Google Scholar
Lutwick, L. E. 1969 Identification of Phytoliths in Soils. Pedology and Quaternary Research. Symposium held at Edmonton, Alberta, pp. 77–82.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. S., Anderson, D. B., Bohning, R. H., and Fratianne, D. G. 1973 Introduction to Plant Physiology. D. Van Nostrand, New York.Google Scholar
Norgren, J. 1973 Distribution, Form and Significance of Plant Opal in Oregon Soils. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis.Google Scholar
Pearsall, D. M. 1978 Phytolith Analysis of Archeological Soils : Evidence for Maize Cultivation in Formative Ecuador. Science 199 : 177–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pease, D. S. 1967 Opal Phytoliths as Indicators of Paleosols. Master's thesis, Department of Agronomy, New Mexico State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Pease, D. S., and Anderson, J. U. 1969 Opal Phytoliths in Bouteloua Eriopoda Torr. Roots and Soils. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 33 : 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piperno, D. R. 1979 Phytolith Analysis of Archaeological Soils from Central Panama. Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Piperno, D. R. 1984 A Comparison and Differentiation of Phytoliths from Maize and Wild Grasses : Use of Morphological Criteria. American Antiquity 49 : 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeside, J. D. 1970 Some New Zealand Plant Opals. New Zealand Journal of Science 13 : 122–132.Google Scholar
Rovner, Irwin 1971 Potential of Opal Phytoliths for Use in Paleoecological Reconstruction. Quaternary Research 1 : 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovner, Irwin 1972 Note on a Safer Procedure for Opal Phytolith Extraction. Quaternary Research 2(4) : 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovner, Irwin 1975 Plant Opal Phytolith Analysis in Midwestern Archaeology. Michigan Academician 8(2) : 129–137.Google Scholar
Suess, E. 1966 Opal Phytoliths. Master's thesis, Department of Geology and Geography, Kansas State University, Manhattan.Google Scholar
Transeau, E. N., Sampson, H. C., and Tiffany, L. H. 1953 Textbook of Botany. Harper and Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
Twiss, P. C. 1978 Use of Grass Phytoliths in Archeologic Geology. Abstracts of Joint Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America 10(7) : 507.Google Scholar
Twiss, P. C, Suess, E., and Smith, R. M. 1969 Morphological Classification of Grass Phytoliths. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 33 : 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, S. D., and Rust, R. H. 1969 Observations on Opal Phytoliths in a Soil Biosequence in Southern Minnesota. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 33 : 749–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, P. J. (editor) 1974 Archeology of the Mammoth Cave Area. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W., and Cutler, H. C. 1965 Cucurbits and Cultures in the Americas. Economic Botany 19(4) : 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, T. W., and Cutler, H. C. 1971 Prehistoric Cucurbits from the Valley of Oaxaca. Economic Botany 25 : 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilding, L. P. 1967 Radiocarbon Dating of Biogenetic Opal. Science 156 : 66–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilding, L. P., and Drees, L. R. 1971 Biogenic Opal in Ohio Soils. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 35 : 1004–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilding, L. P., and Drees, L. R. 1973 Scanning Electron Microscopy of Opaque Opaline Forms Isolated from Forest soils in Ohio. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 37 : 647–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilding, L. P., and Drees, L. R. 1974 Contributions of Forest Opal and Associated Crystalline Phases of Fine Silt and Clay Fractions of soils. Clays and Clay Minerals 22 : 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar