Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:36:25.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Support of Chaco Canyon Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Timothy Earle
Timothy Earle*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208-1310
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I propose that Chaco Canyon was a chiefdom that emphasized a corporate political strategy (Blanton et al. 1996). Corporate groups define the relationship of people to resources, especially as the owners of productive land. Groups are materialized by public ceremonies and monuments, but leaders are typically faceless. Chaco's famous road system, the elaborate architecture of the great houses, and the regional procurement of specific resources support the proposal that Chaco was a corporate chiefdom. To create and sustain the regional institutions of a chiefdom requires not only leaders, but a system of finance. Chaco is argued to have had a system of staple finance, where surplus food and everyday technologies were mobilized from a broad supporting population. Mobilization was based on control of food production, but the method of control has not yet been defined for Chaco. The exchange of prestige goods, such as turquoise, shell, and copper bells, was not part of the system of finance for Chaco, but was part of an interpersonal and noncentralized reciprocal exchange network such as those found broadly in egalitarian societies.

Résumé

Résumé

Propongo que el Cañón Chaco funcionó como un cacicazgo o señorio que enfatizó una estrategia político y corporativa (Blanton et al. 1996). Grupos corporativos delinean los enlaces entre gentes y sus recursos naturales, especialmente como dueáos de tierras productivas. Dichos grupos toman forma por medio de ceremonias públicas y la construcción de monumentos, pero tipicamente los Uderes son anónimos. La evidencia delfamoso sistema de caminos chaqueños, la arquitectura monumental de las "Casas Grandes", y la obtención regional de recursos especificos sostienen la proposición que Chaco llegó a ser un cacicazgo corporativo. La creación y sostenimiento de las instituciones regionales de un cacicazgo requieren no solo Uderes pero también un sistema financiero. Se propone que en Chaco surgió un sistema financiero de productos básicos, en que los comestibles y las tecnologías cotidianas fueron intercambiadas por un mantenimiento de población muy extenso. La movilización de estos recursos fue basada en el control de la producción de alimentos, pero el modo de control todavía no se ha definido para Chaco. El intercambio de artículos prestigiosos, como turquesa, caracol, cascabeles de cobre, no fue parte del sistema financiero de Chaco, sino que procedío de una red personal y no centralizada de intercambios como unas muy conocidas de sociedades igualitarias.

Type
Special Section
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 26 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Arnold, J. E. 1992 Complex Hunter-Gatherer-Fishers of Prehistoric California : Chiefs, Specialists, and Maritime Adaptations of the Channel Island. American Antiquity 57 : 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, R. E., Feinman, G. M., Kowalewski, S. A., and Peregrine, P. N. 1996 A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37 : 1–14.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E., and Earle, T. 1987 Specialization, Exchange and Complex Societies : An Introduction. In Specialization, Exchange and Complex Societies, edited by Brumfiel, E. and Earle, T., pp. 1–9. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Burton, R. 1975 Why Do the Trobriands Have Chiefs? Man 10 : 544–558.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. 1997 The Chipped Stone of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. In Ceramics, Lithics, and Ornaments of Chaco Canyon, edited by Mathien, F., pp. 531–658. Publications in Archaeology 18G Chaco Canyon Studies, National Park Service, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R. 1970 A Theory of the Origin of the State. Science 169 : 733–738.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R. 1981 The Chiefdom as Precursor of the State. In The Transition to Statehood in the New World, edited by Jones, G. and Kurtz, R., pp. 39–79. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dalton, G. 1977 Aboriginal Economies in Stateless Societies. In Exchange Systems in Prehistory, edited by Earle, T. and Ericson, J., pp. 191–212. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
D'Altroy, T, and Earle, T. 1985 Staple Finance, Wealth Finance and Storage in the Inka Political Economy. Current Anthropology 26 : 187–206.Google Scholar
DeMarrais, E., Castillo, L. J., and Earle, T. 1996 A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37 : 1–14.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1977 A Reappraisal of Redistribution : Complex Hawaiian Chiefdoms. In Exchange Systems in Prehistory, edited by Earle, T. and Ericson, J., pp. 213–232. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1978 Economic and Social Organization of a Complex Chiefdom : The Halelea District, Kauai, Hawaii. University of Michigan, Anthropological Papers, Vol. 63. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1982 The Ecology and Politics of Primitive Valuables. In Cultural Ecology : Eclectic Perspectives, edited by Kennedy, J. and Edgerton, R., pp. 65–83. American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1987 Chiefdoms in Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 16 : 279–308.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1991 Property Rights and the Evolution of Chiefdoms. In Chiefdoms : Power, Economy, and Ideology, edited by Earle, T., pp. 71–99. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1997 How Chiefs Come to Power : The Political Economy in Prehistory. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1998 Property Rights and the Evolution of Hawaiian Chiefdoms. In Property in Economic Contexts, edited by Hunt, R. and Gilman, A., pp. 89–118. Monographs in Economic Anthropology. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Earle, T, Bech, J.-H., Kristiansen, K., Aperlo, P., Kelertas, K., and Steinberg, J. M. 1998 The Political Economy of Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Society : The Thy Archaeological Project. Norwegian Archaeological Review 31 : 1–28.Google Scholar
Feinman, G., and Neitzel, J. 1984 Too Many Types : An Overview of Sedentary Prestate Societies in the Americas. Archaeological Method and Theory 7 : 39–102.Google Scholar
Ford, R. I. 1972 Barter, Gift, or Violence : An Analysis of Tewa Intertribal exchange. In Social Exchange and Interaction, edited by Wilmsen, E., pp. 21–45. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Anthropological Papers, No. 46, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Fried, M. 1967 The Evolution of Political Society : An Essay in Political Evolution. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M. 1977 Notes Toward an Epigenetic Model of the Evolution of ‘Civilization.’ In The Evolution of Social Systems, edited by Friedman, J. and Rowlands, M., pp. 201–276. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Helms, M. 1979 Ancient Panama : Chiefs in Search of Power. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Johnson, A., and Earle, T. 1987 The Evolution of Human Societies : From Forager Group to Agrarian State. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Junker, L. L., 1999 Raiding, Trading, and Feasting : The Political Economy of Philippine Chiefdoms. University of Hawai'i Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Kohler, T. A., and Van West, C. R. 1996 The Calculus of Self-interest in the Development of Cooperation : Sociopolitical Development and Risk among the Northern Anasazi. In Evolving Complexity and Environmental Risk in Prehistoric Southwest, edited by Tainter, J. and Tainter, B.B. pp. 169–196. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1987 From Stone to Bronze : The Evolution of Social Complexity in Northern Europe, 2300-1200 B.C. In Specialization, Exchange and Complex Societies, edited by Brumfiel, E. and Earle, T., pp. 30–51. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lekson, S., Windes, T., Stein, J., and Judge, J. 1988 The Chaco Canyon Community. Scientific American 259 : 100–109.Google Scholar
Mathien, F. 1992 Exchange Systems and Social Stratification among the Chaco Anasazi. In The American Southwest and Mesoamerica, edited by Ericson, J. and Baugh, T., pp. 27- 63. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Peebles, C, and Kus, S. 1977 Some Archaeological Correlates of Ranked Societies. American Antiquity 42 : 421–448.Google Scholar
Pires-Ferreira, J., and Flannery, K. 1976 Ethnographic Models of Exchange. In The Early Mesoamerlcan Village, edited by Flannery, K., pp. 286–292. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1957 The Economy as Instituted Process. In Trade and Market in the Early Empires, edited by Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C., and Pearson, H., pp. 243–270. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1974 Beyond a Subsistence Economy : The Evolution of Social Organization in Prehistoric Europe. In Reconstructing Complex Societies, edited by Moore, C., pp. 69- 95. Bulletin of the American School of Oriental Research 20.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1975 Trade as Action at a Distance. In Ancient Civilizations and Trade, edited by Sabloff, J. and C, C.. Lamberg- Karlovsky, pp. 3–59. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1982 Socio-economic Change in Ranked Societies. In Ranking, Resources, and Exchange, edited by Renfrew, C. and Shennan, S..pp. 1–19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sebastian, L. 1992 The Chaco Anasazi : Sociopolitical Evolution in the Prehistoric Southwest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Service, E. 1962 Primitive Social Organization : An Evolutionary Perspective. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Shennan, S. J. 1999 Cost, Benefit and Value in the Organization of Early European Copper Production. Antiquity 73 : 352–363 Google Scholar
Spielmann, K. 1998 Ritual Craft Specialists in Middle Range Societies. In Craft and Social Identity, edited by Costin, C. and Wright, R., pp. 153–159. Archaeological Papers No. 8, American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Stoltman, J. 1999 The Chaco-Chuska Connection : In Defense of Anna Shepard. In Pottery and People : A Dynamic Interaction, edited by Skibo, J. and Feinman, G., pp. 9–24. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Toll, H. W. 1991 Material Distributions and Exchange in the Chaco System. In Chaco & Hohokam : Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Crown, P. and Judge, J., pp. 77–107. School of American Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Toll, H. W., and McKenna, P. 1997 Chaco Ceramics. In Ceramics, Lithics, and Ornaments of Chaco Canyon, edited by Mathien, F., pp. 17–530. Publications in Archaeology 18G, Chaco Canyon Studies, National Park Service, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Vivian, G. 1991 Chacoan Subsistence. In Chaco & Hohokam : Prehistoric Regional Systems in the American Southwest, edited by Crown, P. and Judge, J., pp. 57–75. School of American Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Webster, D. 1985 Warfare and the Evolution of the State. American Antiquity 40 : 464–470.Google Scholar
Weigand, P., and Harbottle, G. 1992 The Role of Turquoise in the Ancient Mesoamerica Trade Structure. In The American Southwest and Mesoamerica, edited by Ericson, J. and Baugh, T., pp. 159–177. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Weigand, P., Harbottle, G., and Sayre, E. 1977 Turquoise Sources and Source Analysis : Mesoamerica and the Southwestern U.S.A. In Exchange Systems in Prehistory, edited by Earle, T. and Ericson, J., pp. 15–34. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Windes, T. 1987 Investigations at the Pueblo Alto Complex, Volume 1, Summary of Tests and Excavations at the Pueblo Alto Complex. Publications in Archaeology 18F, Chaco Canyon Studies. National Park Service, Santa Fe.Google Scholar