Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:21:37.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epistemology of the Significance Concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joseph A. Tainter
Affiliation:
Cibola National Forest, Albuquerque, NM 87112
G. John Lucas
Affiliation:
University of Albuquerque, Albuquerque, NM 87140

Abstract

Although the concept of significance has been widely discussed in cultural resource management, the origin of the idea and the epistemology underlying it have remained unexamined. This paper outlines the history of the significance concept in historic preservation and traces the current view of significance to the empiricist-positivist school of Western philosophical thought. Flaws in the arguments of this school, and in the logic of the significance concept, are raised and discussed. Potential approaches for dealing with aspects of the significance dilemma are proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ayer, Alfred J. 1962 The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. Mac Millan, London.Google Scholar
Ayer, Alfred J. 1972 Language, Truth, and Logic. Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1967 The Logical Structure of the World. Translated by George, R. A.. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1956 The Idea of History. Galaxy, New York.Google Scholar
Comptroller General 1981 Are Agencies Doing Enough or Too Much for Archeologica) Protection? Guidance Needed. U. S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Fain, Haskell 1970 Between Philosophy and History. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. F. 1962 Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. Ill, edited by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G., pp. 2897. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Finley, David E. 1965 History of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1947-1963. National Trust for Historic Preservation, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Fowler, John M. 1974 Protection of the Cultural Environment in Federal Law. In Federal Environmental Law, edited by Dolgin, Erica L. and Guilbert, Thomas G. P., pp. 14661517. West Publishing, St. Paul.Google Scholar
Fritz, John M. 1968 Archaeological Epistemology: Two Views. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Glassow, Michael A. 1977 Issues in Evaluating the Significance of Archaeological Resources. American Antiquity 42:413420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, Albert C, Raab, L. Mark, and Klinger, Timothy C. 1978 The Status of Archaeological Research Design in Cultural Resource Management. American Antiquity 43:159173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Mark, and Lipe, William 1977 The Role of Preservation in Conservation Archaeology. ASCA Proceedings 1976:111.Google Scholar
Green, Dee F., and Plog, Fred (editors) 1983 Problem Orientation and Allocation Strategies /or Prehistoric Cultural Resources on the New Mexico Forests. Ms. on file, USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Regional Office, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. 1958 Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Hill, James N., and Evans, Robert K. 1972 A Model for Classification and Typology. In Models in Archaeology, edited by Clarke, David L., pp. 231274. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Hosmer, Charles B. Jr. 1965 Presence of the Past: A History of the Preservation Movement in the United States Before Williamsburg. Putnam, New York.Google Scholar
Hosmer, Charles B. Jr. 1981 Preservation Comes of Age: From Williamsburg to the National Trust, 1926-1949. University Pressof Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1961 A Treatise of Human Nature. Dolphin, New York.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1963 Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
James, William 1963 Pragmatism. Meridian Books, New York.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1943 Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Meiklejohn, J. M. D.. Willey Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
King, Thomas F. 1971 A Conflict of Values in American Archaeology. American Antiquity 36:255262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Thomas F. 1977 Resolving a Conflict of Values in American Archaeology. In Conservation Archaeology: A Guide for Cultural Resource Management Studies, edited by Schiffer, Michael B. and Gumerman, George J., pp. 8795. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
King, Thomas F. 1979 The Trouble with Archeology. Journal of Field Archaeology 6:351352.Google Scholar
King, Thomas F., Hickman, Patricia P., and Berg, Gary 1977 Anthropology in Historic Preservation: Caring for Culture's Clutter. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, Leszek 1972 Positivist Philosophy. Pelican, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas F. 1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre 1968 Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic. In The Problem of Inductive Logic, edited by Imre, Lakatos, pp. 315417. North-Holland, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipe, William D. 1974 A Conservation Model for American Archaeology. The Kiva 39:213245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipe, William D. 1978 Contracts, Bureaucrats, and Research: Some Emerging Problems of Conservation Archaeologyin the United States. In Archaeological Essays in Honor of Irving B. Rouse, edited by Dunnell, Robert C. and Hall, Edwin S. Jr. , pp. 121147. Mouton, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John 1950 An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lynott, Mark J. 1980 The Dynamics of Significance: An Example from Central Texas. American Antiquity 45:117120. McMillan, Bruce, Mark Grady, and William Lipe Google Scholar
Lynott, Mark J. 1977 Cultural Resource Management. In The Management of Archeological Resources: The Airiie House Report, edited by McGimsey, Charles R. III and Davis, Hester A., pp. 2563. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Meineke, Friedrich 1972 Historicism: The Rise of the New Historical Outlook. Translated by Anderson, J. E.. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart 1965 A System of Logic. Longman's Green, London.Google Scholar
Moratto, Michael J., and Kelly, Roger E. 1978 Optimizing Strategies for Evaluating Archaeological Significance. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1, edited by Schiffer, Michael B., pp. 130. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mulloy, Elizabeth D. 1976 The History of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, 1963-1973. The Preservation Press, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Nickens, Paul R. 1980 Regional Research Design Development in Cultural Resource Management: Problems and Prospects. Southwestern Lore 46(3):2330.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1955 How to Make our Ideas Clear. In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, edited by Buchler, J., pp. 2341. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Plog, Fred 1981 Cu Jtural Resources Overview, Little Colorado Area, Arizona. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1959 The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1963 From a Logical Point of View: 9 Logico-philosophical Essays. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Raab, L. Mark 1981 Getting First Things First: Taming the Mitigation Monster. Contract Abstracts and CRM Archeology 2:79.Google Scholar
Raab, L. Mark, and C. Klinger, Timothy 1977 A Critical Appraisal of “Significance” in Contract Archaeology. American Antiquity 42:629634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1956 The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. In Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901-1950. edited by Marsh, R. C., pp. 175320. George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. 1971 The Foundations of Scientific Inquiry. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and Gumerman, George J. 1977 Assessing Significance. In Conservation Archaeology: A Guide for Cultural Resource Management Studies, edited by Schiffer, Michael B. and Gumerman, George J., pp. 239247. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and House, John H. 1977 Cultural Resource Management and Archaeological Research: The Cache Project. Current Anthropology 18:4368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, Moritz 1949 Meaning and Verification. In Readings in Philosophical Analysis, edited by Feigl, H. and Sellars, W., pp. 146170. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. Thomas 1935 Report to the Secretary of the Interior on the Preservation of Historic Sites and Buildings. U. S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Sharrock, Floyd W., and Grayson, Donald K. 1979 “Significance” in Contract Archaeology. American Antiquity 44:327328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, David E., and Gauthier, Rory P. 1981 Prehistoric New Mexico: Background for Survey. New Mexico Historic Preservation Bureau, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R., and Sabloff, Jeremy A. 1974 A History of American Archaeology. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1922 Tractatus Logico-philosophicus. Translated by Ogden, C. K.. Kegan Paul, Trench, & Trubner, London.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. M. 1968 Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar